• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Charles Graeber attends a screening of Netflix's "The Good Nurse" at Paris Theater. Taylor Hill/FilmMagic

'The Good Nurse' author wins $6,200 from Anthropic for stealing his books — but the years of fighting have made him 'much poorer'

Charles Graeber knows that what he and a group of other authors accomplished was epic.

Together, they took on AI giant Anthropic in a class-action lawsuit that resulted in one of the largest copyright infringement settlements of all time. But he’s still not ready to claim victory.

Advertisement

The author of the bestselling true crime book The Good Nurse — along with fellow writers Andrea Bartz and Kirk Wallace Johnson — were among those whose lawsuit led Claude maker Anthropic to agree to a $1.5 billion settlement in July, roughly two years after the authors sued the company.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

But the agreement was only a partial victory. On a personal level, Graeber said it came at a steep cost.

Lawyers will get a portion of the settlement while thousands of authors will split what’s left.

Graeber said he’ll receive $3,100 for each of the two books Anthropic used without authorization to train the large language model behind the Claude chatbot. In the end, though, that’s not as much as it sounds.

“A lot of travel, a lot of discussion about what to do and how to proceed and a lot of jobs passed up,” Graeber told NPR. “I’m much poorer for this settlement, ironically.”

A win or a loss?

While the AI company agreed to pay a near-record amount, the case was hardly a win for authors.

The court ruled that Anthropic did not violate copyright law simply by training its AI models on copyrighted books. Instead, the company was held liable for using unauthorized copies of those works.

AI companies, including Anthropic, have argued that the fair use doctrine allows them to use copyrighted material without permission in certain circumstances. Authors have countered that fair use doesn’t apply because AI systems are trained on their work to generate new writing that could compete with the originals.

A machine that can produce a book in minutes or hours has an inherent advantage over human authors, they argue. Graeber, for example, spent a decade researching and writing The Good Nurse, which Netflix has since adapted into a film.

Advertisement

“I felt very small,” he told People in 2025. “I’m one person and this is a huge tech company that didn’t feel the need to even notify me that they wanted or were using several books.”

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Continuing the fight

The legal dispute with Anthropic, which has confidentially filed with the SEC for an initial public offering later this year, may be over for now. But Graeber, Bartz and Johnson say they’ll continue advocating for authors as AI technology evolves.

Their focus has shifted to talking with fellow authors and publishers about what the lawsuit means while helping the public better understand its implications.

“The genie’s out of the bottle with AI. None of us are trying to put it back in,” Graeber said. “But creators should be treated as partners, as co-creators, an essential part of what comes next, as opposed to mined as free raw material and then thrown away.”

You May Also Like

Share this:
Chris Morris Contributing Writer

Chris Morris is a veteran journalist with more than 35 years of experience at many of the internet's biggest news outlets. In addition to his activities as a writer, reporter and editor, Chris is also a frequent panel moderator and speaker at major conferences, including CES and South by Southwest.

more from Chris Morris

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.