SPY +0.80%
BND -0.13%
QQQ +1.44%
DIA +0.34%
VNQ -1.43%
GLD +0.81%
BTC +0.82%
AAPL +0.41%
GOOGL +2.19%
NVDA +0.81%
MSFT -0.93%
META -2.70%
AMZN +1.37%
TSLA +2.61%
UBER -1.25%
GS +3.23%
BAC +0.71%
JPM +1.58%
BRK.A -1.04%
COST -2.17%
XOM -0.87%
BABA -0.08%
WMT -1.31%
SPCX -1.26%
DIS -1.22%
F +2.12%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei. Ludovic MARIN / AFP via Getty Images

Too big to be insured? Anthropic warns it may lack coverage for a 'catastrophic AI-related incident'

Prospective shareholders are combing through Anthropic’s registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission for information about the trajectory of the AI boom. One disclosure within its roughly 400-page filing is raising new questions about who foots the bill for AI incidents.

Anthropic, the maker of Claude, disclosed that its current insurance policies “may not provide sufficient coverage” to mitigate the potential for colossal financial liabilities stemming from AI-related incidents.

Advertisement

The AI giant was blunt in laying out how the size of its insurance policies might not be enough to fully compensate victims of a devastating incident from its models.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

“With the scale of harm that could result from a catastrophic AI-related incident, no single insurer, and potentially the insurance industry in the aggregate, may have sufficient capacity or expertise to underwrite insurance commensurate with such exposure,” the company said.

Still, Anthropic argued the case for AI, saying adoption will “profoundly accelerate” the speed of progress in biology and medicine and help solve incurable illnesses like cancer. The company also said it will benefit the economy and “could bring about a sustained acceleration in economic growth, with all the benefits for human wellbeing that growth can bring.”

AI incidents and the lack of adequate insurance

AI incidents are already piling up. The AI Risk Initiative at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has catalogued a total of 1,777 incidents of varying severities as of Oct. 28.

Some high-profile incidents already generated headlines this year, such as when OpenAI disclosed that 700 AI agents went rogue in July and swarmed the Hugging Face open-source platform. Anthropic also publicly reported that its Claude model had broken out of an isolated test environment by exploiting previously unknown vulnerabilities. Claude later gained access to three separate organizations.

The AI industry is already fending off lawsuits related to intellectual property and safety as its models become more popular and widely adopted. Given that landscape, AI companies do carry insurance to guard them from cyber risk and general liability among other categories, according to the Wall Street Journal. Some insurers take it a step further and sell risk policies that specifically shield AI agents. This has caused some companies to set aside their own funds for potential claims down the road.

“The fact that this litigation is happening before the industry is profitable means that companies are trying to use venture funds and insurance to cover these costs (since they don’t have any other funds),” Josephine Wolff, a cybersecurity policy professor at Tufts University’s Fletcher School, wrote in a May 12 article.

Must Read

The future of AI insurance

Standalone insurance specifically meant for AI firms is beginning to take off. On April 30, 2025, Armilla Insurance Services launched an AI liability insurance policy that protects against risks such as AI hallucinations, degrading AI model performance and unexpected AI behavior.

On May 15, 2025 Google teamed up with insurers Chubb, Beazley and Munich Re to offer policies for Google Cloud customers. It shields against the loss of trade secrets due to AI tools that go rogue.

You May Also Like

Share this:

Joseph Zeballos-Roig is a policy and politics journalist based in Washington D.C with a focus on economics. He is experienced in connecting the significance of events in the capital to the lives of everyday Americans whether its taxes, tariffs, interest rates or federal programs.

more from Joseph Zeballos-Roig

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.