Jun 17, 2026
Uber and Lyft have become crucial for many Americans on their way to work, the airport, a doctor’s appointment or a night out without driving. Uber says it had 199 million monthly active platform consumers at the end of the first quarter of 2026, while Lyft reported a record 29.2 million active riders in the fourth quarter of 2025.
But a new investigation raises a simple question for riders opening those apps: Are you seeing the same price as the person standing next to you?
Advertisement
According to Consumer Reports, the answer is often no. In some cases, Uber and Lyft riders checking the same route at nearly the same time saw dramatically different prices, even when they were trying to book what appeared to be the same ride.
In one Kansas City-area Lyft test cited by NBC News, 55 volunteers checking the same route generated 29 different prices. In Austin, Texas, another route produced fares ranging from $25 to $65, a $40 difference for the same trip, or a 160% increase.
“What the heck is going on?” Len Sherman, an executive-in-residence at Columbia Business School, told Consumer Reports after reviewing the findings.
Uber and Lyft denied surveillance pricing
Consumer Reports recruited 174 volunteers in March and April to test more than 40 Uber and Lyft routes across 18 states. Across the 30 virtual routes it tested, the median difference between the lowest and highest price groups was about 50%.
The group said every route tested produced multiple prices. In one Phoenix-area Uber test, 18 riders checked the same route at the same local time and saw base fares clustered around $55, $57, $58 and $60. After discounts were applied, the final prices ranged from $41.21 to $56.96.
Uber and Lyft both denied using “surveillance pricing,” or setting individual fares based on personal data. Uber told NBC News it “does not personalize prices, period,” while Lyft said prices are driven by trip characteristics, real-time supply and demand and disclosed promotions.
Uber also challenged Consumer Reports’ methodology, arguing that ride prices can change second by second based on demand, driver availability, traffic, GPS precision and other marketplace conditions.
But Consumer Reports said its tests were designed to control for timing, with volunteers checking prices within minutes of one another, and often within the same minute.
Advertisement
The investigation also raised questions about discounts. Consumer Reports found that nearly half of the upfront prices it examined appeared to include some kind of discount or savings. But nearly 11% of advertised discounts appeared to be based on inflated original prices, a practice experts described as false reference pricing or fictitious discounts.
Uber and Lyft denied offering fake discounts. Uber said some crossed-out prices are meant as historical comparison messaging, not discount claims.
Must Read
- The ultra-rich use these 5 real estate strategies to build wealth while they sleep — you can start with just $100
- Here’s the average income of Americans by age in 2026. Are you keeping up or falling behind?
- Insurance companies profit most from drivers who auto-renew without shopping around. Comparing 100+ quotes takes 2 minutes and costs nothing
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Can riders do anything about it?
For now, there may be no reliable way for consumers to know exactly why Uber or Lyft quoted them a specific fare. That matters because ride-hailing prices are already difficult to compare.
A recent National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) working study found that identical Uber and Lyft rides in New York City differed by about 14% on average, yet only 16.1% of riders opened both apps before booking. The researchers estimated that those “search frictions” could indirectly leave New York City riders paying $300 million more a year because they don’t compare fares.
That suggests one practical step: Check both Uber and Lyft before booking, especially for airport trips or longer rides. Neither app is consistently cheaper, according to the NBER study, which means loyalty to one platform could come at a cost.
But Consumer Reports argues the bigger question is whether regulators should be able to audit how these fares and promotions are set. Without that transparency, riders may never know whether the person next to them is paying less for the exact same ride.
You May Also Like
- JP Morgan sees gold hitting $6,000/oz before 2027 — and a Gold IRA lets you hold the physical metal while deferring the tax bill. Get your free guide from Priority Gold
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
Clay Halton is an associate editor at Money.ca, covering a wide range of consumer-focused financial stories. He has over eight years of experience in digital publishing and has written and edited for outlets including PCMag and Investopedia.
