SPY -1.07%
BND -0.37%
QQQ -0.44%
DIA -1.96%
VNQ -1.20%
GLD -0.85%
BTC -1.53%
AAPL -2.14%
GOOGL -2.67%
NVDA -2.61%
MSFT -1.57%
META +5.44%
AMZN -2.73%
TSLA +4.63%
UBER -5.92%
GS -1.31%
BAC +0.01%
JPM -1.12%
BRK.A +0.00%
COST -1.57%
XOM +2.54%
BABA -3.09%
WMT -1.13%
SPCX -1.17%
DIS -0.91%
F -4.10%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Economy
Nikolas Stihl is pushing for a longer work week, while Bernie Sanders wants a shorter one. Bernd Weißbrod/picture alliance via Getty Images /Jason Alpert-Wisnia/Hans Lucas/AFP via Getty Images

Bernie Sanders backs a 32-hour work week — now German tool maker Stihl says 35 isn't cutting it. Is 40 still the magic number?

Advertisement

“It’s time to reduce the stress level in our country and allow Americans to enjoy a better quality of life,” said Sanders in an op-ed. “It’s time for a 32-hour work week with no loss in pay.”

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Meanwhile, Stihl has argued for the opposite; it wants to rescind Germany’s long-held 35-hour work week for the company’s metalworkers.

We no longer have the productivity advantage over key competitors that used to justify our high labour costs,” said Nikolas Stihl, who works as the chairman for the chainsaw company Stihl, to Euronews. “That is why I advocate increasing weekly working hours to 40, without any pay compensation.”

Here’s where both Sanders and Stihl are coming from — and which groups win if either of them get their way.

The 40-hour work week was a huge win for unions

Both the U.S.’s 40-hour work week and Germany’s 35-hour work week for metalworkers came from hard-fought union battles for workers’ rights.

The National Labor Union — the first one of its kind in the U.S. — was founded in 1866 and quickly started calling for an 8-hour work day. By 1912, the call had coalesced into a movement, complete with a slogan: “Eight hours for work, eight hours for rest and eight hours for what you will.”

Thanks to the Great Depression, unions finally got their wish. In 1933, Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed the President’s Reemployment Agreement, which encouraged (but did not enforce) a 35-hour work week in the hopes it would cause companies to hire more workers.

In 1938, FDR signed the historic Fair Labor Standards Act, which officially enforced a 40-hour work week. If full-time workers worked more than 40 hours each week, they would have to receive overtime pay.

Germany’s 35-hour work week is comparatively newer; metalworkers won it in 1995, after a six-and-a-half week strike in the 1980s that also centered around growing unemployment in the industry.

Advertisement

But some people — including billionaires and company leaders — are unhappy about both of these wins.

“Nobody ever changed the world on 40 hours a week,” Elon Musk said in a 2018 tweet. When pressed about how many hours it takes to change the world, Musk said, “about 80 sustained, peaking above 100 at times.”

Google cofounder Sergey Brin has also said that a longer work week — in his case, a 60-hour work week — was better, saying it was “the sweet spot of productivity.” Both Musk and Brin work in tech, an industry that not-infrequently requires its employees to work well past a standard eight-hour workday.

Volkswagen has also called for an end to the 35-hour work week, echoing Stihl’s statements on the German work week.

Must Read

Who benefits from shorter or longer work weeks?

Stihl says he’s interested in bringing back the 40-hour work week to make Germany more competitive as a country with a high cost of labor. He’s hoping that companies in Germany can make this change to get a greater volume of work for less.

“If we want to maintain our prosperity and keep social benefits at a high level, the total volume of work in the economy has to increase,” he said to Euronews. “A higher volume of work boosts economic output.“

Advertisement

But workers might not agree to it.

For the most part, employers have been the ones reaping the benefits of the increased productivity that new technology has brought up. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, productivity increased by almost 150% from 2000 to 2022; in that same time, labor compensation has only increased by a little over 110%, and hours worked has actually gone up.

A four-day work week would allow workers to profit from some of that increased productivity. While research is still new, it’s shown that workers on a four-day, 32-hour workweek have better well-being and satisfaction. Employers benefit, too: four-day work weeks increase employee retention and make it easier to recruit new workers.

If a shorter work week makes employees happier, it makes sense that instituting a longer work week for less pay will hurt employees’ sense of well-being. Disgruntled workers might intentionally put less effort into their jobs, decreasing the same productivity companies were hoping to boost.

A four-day workweek might not be the right choice for every company, even if the current research looks to be in favor. But increasing hours that laborers fought to win is unlikely to give companies the results they’re working for — and could end up harming their business.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Kit Pulliam Freelance Writer

Kit Pulliam is a DC-based financial journalist with over five years of experience writing, editing and fact-checking financial content.

more from Kit Pulliam

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.