• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Economy
President Joe Biden JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images

Trump says he’s 'canceling' 92% of all documents signed by Biden, citing 'illegal' autopen use. Here’s what’s at risk for Americans

They say that the pen is mightier than the sword. But the autopen? It’s unclear how that might hold up — especially when facing the wrath of a U.S. president bent on reversing any documents it was used to sign.

President Trump claimed last week that he’s canceling “all executive orders, and anything else” that his predecessor, President Biden, signed via autopen — a mechanical device used to replicate the commander-in-chief’s signature.

Advertisement

In a Truth Social rant presented without evidence, Trump said “radical left lunatics” around Biden “took the presidency away from him” and used the autopen illegally while the ex-president “was not involved” (1). He claimed that the alleged violations would encompass 92% of the documents Biden signed. Trump also threatened Biden with perjury charges if he denies the improper use.

Trump’s declaration followed an October Republican-led Oversight Committee report that claimed Biden’s aides “exercised presidential authority and facilitated executive actions without his direct authorization, including misusing the autopen.”

The report, however, doesn’t provide any concrete proof, and Biden’s aides shot back, saying that he authorized all autopen signings. President Biden himself previously refuted Trump’s autopen accusations, saying he alone made decisions about what he signed and that suggestions to the contrary are “ridiculous and false.”

Use of the autopen — or any device that replicates the president’s signature on official documents — to sign laws, orders or pardons is perfectly legal and can be traced back to Thomas Jefferson. In recent years, Presidents Obama, Biden and, yes, even Trump himself, have all used the device — though Trump claimed his use of the autopen was only to sign “very unimportant papers,” and that using it for pardons was “disgraceful.”

Despite that assertion, however, any Trump attempt to nullify what Biden signed with the autopen could result in steep financial ramifications for millions of Americans.

The cost of an autopen crusade

Undoing Biden-era decisions is nothing new for Trump. In fact, he overturned 67 of Biden’s 162 executive orders and multiple presidential memorandums upon taking office in January, and then another 19 executive actions in March.

Now, his threat to nullify “all executive orders, and anything else” signed with the autopen suggests that he could take aim at laws like the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The IRA, which contains clean energy tax credits and other climate-related grants and initiatives, as well as a $2,000 cap on the cost of prescription drugs for those on Medicare, can only be repealed by Congress.

Advertisement

Undoing the law, if Trump attempted to do so, would claw back prescription discounts for an estimated 19 million Americans who reportedly save an annual average of $400 on drug costs — or an overall total of roughly $7.6 billion.

The Trump administration has already tried to interfere with the IRA’s implementation and the new One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) “dismantles or narrows many of the clean energy tax credits,” according to Mintz Insights (2). However, recent events suggest the president is for lowering prescription drug prices and supports the Medicare drug negotiation program introduced by the IRA.

Another existing Biden policy that Trump could reverse, hitting Americans in the pocketbooks, is the former’s 2023 executive order “Increasing Access to High-Quality Care and Supporting Caregivers,” which directs agencies to lower costs of things like child care and improve jobs and support for caregivers.

While there’s no specific dollar amount estimate for what a reversal could cost taxpayers, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) notes that the executive order also updates the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) and “limits the amount that families pay [for child care] to 7% of their household income,” along with further benefits for low income and other “vulnerable families.” The HHS estimates the order lowers childcare costs for 100,000 children.

Meanwhile, a 2021 executive order designed to “strengthen the resilience of America's supply chains” could also face the chopping block. As Daily Kos pointed out, the order “laid the groundwork for the CHIPS and Science Act,” which provided billions in funding for semiconductor research and the creation of related jobs (3). The outlet estimates that reversing the order would mean “renegotiating grants, disrupting supply contracts, and killing momentum in domestic semiconductor manufacturing,” costing taxpayers up to $500 million.

Advertisement

All told, canceling more Biden-era decrees could carry a price tag in the billions for Americans already reeling from soaring cost-of-living increases. That said, legal experts largely agree that the law and the Constitution prevent Trump from actually carrying out many of his stated plans to undo autopen-signed documents.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Law and (executive) order

While presidents routinely undo the executive orders of their predecessors, the legal wrench in Trump’s plan to overturn Biden’s executive orders “and anything else” signed with an autopen lies in the “anything else” part of that threat.

"Trump is free to revoke all of Biden's executive orders, whether or not Biden personally signed them,” Ed Whelan, lawyer and former president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, wrote on X. “But he doesn't have the same freedom with respect to 'anything else' (e.g., bills enacted by Congress, pardons) that Biden directed be signed by autopen."

Given presidents can’t legally overrule bills or laws passed by Congress, it would seem that the Medicare prescription drug cap built into the IRA is safe. Trump also can’t charge Biden with perjury for disputing Trump’s claims, given Biden never testified under oath about his autopen use. And when it comes to pardons, which Trump also threatened to revoke, including for those perceived as political enemies — like Dr. Anthony Fauci, or President Biden’s son, Hunter Biden — that also seems like a no-go.

Not only does a president not have the authority to overturn pardons, but Georgetown University constitutional law professor David Super noted to States Newsroom that, technically, the POTUS doesn’t even legally need to write the pardon down and sign it to make it official in the first place (4).

Advertisement

“If President Biden wanted to simply verbally tell someone they're pardoned, he could do that,” Super said. “Administratively, of course, we want things in writing. It makes things a lot simpler, but there's no constitutional requirement.”

Political scientist Elaine Kamarck, meanwhile, explained to ABC News that creating an overall air of illegality around autopen use would mean that "many of the actions and regulations that presidents have done for the past four or five decades are null and void. It's a ridiculous argument (5)."

Ridiculous, true, but bringing the argument into the political discourse could bolster public endorsements from Trump allies — including the Republican-controlled Congress and Senate — giving the president political cover to roll back Biden policies while creating regulatory uncertainty for laws and orders that remain.

Not to mention, this autopen crusade could complicate the tool’s use by future presidents.

“When so much is being automated and put online,” constitutional law expert Bernadette Meyler told Time, “requiring some literalness in the signature really would be a step backwards (6)."

Article sources

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our editorial ethics and guidelines.

@realDonaldTrump (1); Mintz Insights (2); Daily Kos (3); States Newsroom (4); ABC News (5); Time (6);

You May Also Like

Share this:
Mike Crisolago Staff Reporter

Mike Crisolago is a Staff Reporter at Moneywise with more than 15 years of experience in the journalism industry as a writer, editor, content strategist and podcast host. His work has appeared in various Canadian print and digital publications including Zoomer magazine, Quill & Quire and Canadian Family, among others. He’s also served as a mentor to students in Centennial College’s journalism program.

more from Mike Crisolago

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.