• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Economy
Happy group of seniors. DavideAngelini/Shutterstock

'Peace of mind' for retirees: Social Security and Medicare won't run out of money as quickly as feared — but critics still say current policy is 'condemning' seniors to benefit cuts

Social Security and Medicare advocates are celebrating a win — albeit a small one — after the Trustees of the Social Security and Medicare trust funds announced the programs’ go-broke dates have been pushed back by one year and five years, respectively.

This small win for the U.S. social safety net was lauded by Social Security Administration Commissioner Martin O’Malley as “a measure of good news for the millions of Americans who depend on Social Security.”

Advertisement

But O’Malley also noted that a one-year reprieve won’t solve the problems plaguing Social Security, which is relied upon by about 71 million Americans, including retirees, disabled people and children.

He called on Congress to “take action,” stating: “Eliminating the shortfall will bring peace of mind to Social Security’s 70 million-plus beneficiaries, the 180 million workers and their families who contribute to Social Security, and the entire nation.”

Here’s when Social Security and Medicare are projected to go broke — and what lawmakers in Washington plan to do about it.

‘Significant financing issues’

The Trustees of the Social Security and Medicare trust funds kicked off their 2024 report summary with a simple fact: “both [Social Security and Medicare] continue to face significant financing issues.”

The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund, which is used to pay retired workers, their spouses and children, and survivors, is expected to last until 2033 — after which the fund will only be able to meet 79% of its obligations.

Americans that receive or care for those receiving disability insurance (DI) can breathe a little easier. According to the report, the disability insurance trust fund is projected to be able to pay 100% of total scheduled benefits through at least 2098.

Advertisement

When the OASI and DI funds are combined, the resulting OASDI trust fund is expected to be able to meet 100% of its financial commitments until 2035 — which is one year later than the trustees reported last year, due primarily to higher projected labor productivity and a lower long-term-disability incidence rate.

After 2035, the OASDI’s continuing total fund income will only be enough to pay 83% of scheduled benefits.

By law, the two funds cannot actually be combined. The OASDI projection is used to indicate the overall status and solvency of Social Security.

Meanwhile, Medicare’s go-broke date for its hospital insurance (HI) trust fund was delayed by five years to 2036 in the latest report, which the trustees attributed, in part, to higher payroll-tax income and lower-than-projected expenses from last year.

Again, once the HI fund’s reserves are depleted, Medicare — the federal health insurance program that covers people age 65 and older and those with severe disabilities or illnesses — would only be able to cover 89% of its typical costs.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Politicians react

President Joe Biden reacted to the trustees’ report on X, claiming a win: “Medicare is stronger and Social Security remains strong. My economic plan has helped extend Medicare solvency by a decade. And I am committed to extending Social Security solvency by making the rich pay their fair share.”

Advertisement

Rather than raising taxes on select individuals to help fund the welfare programs, the majority of House GOP lawmakers seemingly would take a different approach.

In March, a budget released by the Republican Study Committee, a group of more than 170 House GOP lawmakers, endorsed “modest adjustments to the retirement age for future retirees to account for increases in life expectancy,” as well as converting Medicare into a “premium support model.”

Those conflicting approaches prove that one party alone is unlikely to solve the financial crisis that lurks deep in Social Security and Medicare programs, according to House Budget Committee Chairman, Jodey C. Arrington.

“We have the highest levels of indebtedness in our nation’s history, an inflationary and anemic economy and the two most important senior safety net programs facing insolvency,” Arrington, released in a statement. “The trustees report only reiterates why we need a bipartisan Fiscal Commission to address the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds and the $140 trillion unfunded liability on America’s balance sheet.

“Republicans and Democrats have both proven they will not fix Social Security on their own. We must put our seniors and country first and work together to find a solution. Doing nothing is condemning our seniors to automatic benefit cuts and our country to a future debt crisis.”

You May Also Like

Share this:

Bethan Moorcraft is a reporter for Moneywise with experience in news editing and business reporting across international markets.

more from Bethan Moorcraft

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.