Nancy Pelosi’s husband dumped 2,000 Visa (V) shares in July — just weeks before the payments giant was sued by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for monopolizing the debit markets.
The timely trade — which documents show was worth at least $500,000 — has once again set the rumor mill running about the former House speaker and her venture capitalist husband’s investing strategies, which have netted them an impressive nine-figure net worth over the years.
Some believe the pair have too much influence and institutional knowledge to trade fairly — in the Visa case, potentially helping them to avoid a drop in the stock value amid the DOJ lawsuit — but they have repeatedly brushed off any allegations of wrongdoing.
Pelosi’s spokesperson has said multiple times that the congresswoman “does not own any stocks.” The money moves are being made by her husband, Paul — and, as is required by law, she then discloses his trades to Congress via Periodic Transaction Reports.
Here’s what’s gotten her critics so riled up.
Another timely trade
The DOJ filed a civil antitrust lawsuit against payments giant Visa on Tuesday, Sept. 24, for anticompetitive conduct and monopolizing the debit market.
It claims Visa illegally paid its rivals to keep them out of the market and hinder innovation. As a result, it holds about a 60% share of the debit payments market and earns about $7 billion annually in debit swipe fees, per the DOJ.
“We allege that Visa has unlawfully amassed the power to extract fees that far exceed what it could charge in a competitive market,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland in a press release announcing the lawsuit. “Merchants and banks pass along those costs to consumers, either by raising prices or reducing quality or service. As a result, Visa’s unlawful conduct affects not just the price of one thing – but the price of nearly everything.”
Visa stock slumped shortly after the DOJ’s announcement — but unlike some investors, the Pelosis’ came out of that dip without too much pain.
That’s because Paul sold 2,000 Visa shares — worth between $500,001 and $1 million — on July 1, 2024, according to Pelposi’s congressional filing on July 3. The trade was defined as a “partial” sale, meaning he did not unload his entire holding.
There was no public indication at the time of the transaction that the DOJ was preparing to sue Visa.
This case bears some comparison to another well-timed trade Paul made in December 2022, when he sold 30,000 shares of Google (GOOGL) stock just one month before the tech giant was sued over alleged antitrust violations.
Must Read
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Robert Kiyosaki begs investors not to miss this ‘explosion’ — says this 1 asset will surge 400% in a year
- Vanguard reveals what could be coming for U.S. stocks, and it’s raising alarm bells for retirees. Here’s why and how to protect yourself
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Banning lawmakers from trading
There is a growing chorus of Americans who think lawmakers — and their spouses — should be banned from trading because of the unfair advantage they have as well-connected people with the inside track on legislation that might affect a company or industry.
Christopher Josephs, a tech entrepreneur who runs the “Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker” on X, is firmly in that camp. On X, he highlights politicians’ trades “so we [Americans] can invest alongside” or, even better, “get them banned from trading.”
In a post on Monday, Sept. 23 — one day before the DOJ filed the antitrust lawsuit — he described Pelosi’s timely sale of Visa shares as “wild.” But in a follow-up post, he was quick to state: “No one's proven she trades on insider info.”
In an effort to put an end to the suspicion around the Pelosis’ trades, her spokesperson stated she has “no prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions.”
Ron Geffner, a former enforcement attorney with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), acknowledged that sometimes politicians’ “conflicts are called into question” when they disclose trades — but he encouraged Pelosi’s critics to consider the context behind her disclosures before jumping to conclusions.
“Before public opinion judges Pelosi unfairly, it is important to determine who engaged in the transaction on her behalf as well as whether it was part of a broader change of her portfolio,” he told the New York Post.
The former speaker did disclose several other trades made by her husband around the same time as the Visa sale — including the sale of 2,500 Tesla (TSLA) shares, worth up to $500,000, and the purchase of 10,000 Nvidia shares (NVDA), worth up to $5 million.
You May Also Like
- Turning 50 with $0 saved for retirement? Most people don’t realize they’re actually just entering their prime earning decade. Here are 6 ways to catch up fast
- This 20-year-old lotto winner refused $1M in cash and chose $1,000/week for life. Now she’s getting slammed for it. Which option would you pick?
- Warren Buffett used these 8 repeatable money rules to turn $9,800 into a $150B fortune. Start using them today to get rich (and stay rich)
- Here are 5 easy ways to own multiple properties like Bezos and Beyoncé. You can start with $10 (and no, you don’t have to manage a single thing)
Bethan Moorcraft is a reporter for Moneywise with experience in news editing and business reporting across international markets.
