SPY -0.26%
BND -1.09%
QQQ -0.28%
DIA -0.10%
VNQ -1.95%
GLD -1.66%
BTC -2.49%
AAPL +0.50%
GOOGL -2.04%
NVDA -1.69%
MSFT +3.99%
META +1.53%
AMZN -1.96%
TSLA -1.67%
UBER -0.37%
GS -1.39%
BAC +0.96%
JPM +0.87%
BRK.A +0.38%
COST +2.54%
XOM +1.13%
BABA -5.61%
WMT -1.96%
SPCX -3.86%
DIS +1.63%
F -2.90%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Economy
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani visits employees at Citi Field. Caean Couto/Getty Images

‘Not every millionaire leaves’: What happened to the wealth migration from New York and California? Why the super rich stay put despite tax hikes

From Jeff Bezos to Mark Zuckerberg and Larry Ellison, the rich have been packing their bags and leaving states and cities that are looking to hit them with higher taxes.

Last year alone, some of the world’s wealthiest people bolted from California to Florida just to avoid the Golden State’s proposed billionaire tax. That trend seems to indicate a clear cause-and-effect scenario: if states raise taxes on the wealthy, rich people will leave.

Advertisement

But new IRS data shows something different. According to a Fiscal Policy Institute analysis of IRS Statistics of Income data, the states with the most progressive tax systems still have the highest concentration of millionaires.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

These states — California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York, as well as Washington, D.C. — have also seen a growth in their number of millionaires since 2020.

“Not every millionaire leaves, or even most millionaires leave, when you raise top marginal rates,” Adam N. Michel, director of tax policy studies at the Cato Institute, told Fortune. “There are some wealthy people that leave. They tend to be the ones that are least connected in the state — after you sell your business and you’re retired, or you’re a superstar scientist or an athlete, someone that has a lot of options.”

New York’s wealth taxes

New York stands as a prime example that millionaires are staying put even if taxes are going up. In 2023, the most recent year of data, New York’s millionaire share rose even after the state raised the tax rate on incomes over $1 million.

According to data from the Fiscal Policy Institute, in 2016 there were 57,126 people in the state who earned $1 million per year. By 2019, that number grew to 68,068. In 2021, the state raised taxes on those earners, but the number of millionaires still jumped 21% to 84,366. Meanwhile, the number of millionaires who left the state fell.

The wealthy in New York aren’t just being hit by higher income taxes. In 2019, the state expanded its “mansion tax,” which applies to home sales in New York City that are over $1 million. That still didn’t turn millionaires away from the city.

And of course, the latest levy targeting the state’s wealthy individuals is the pied-à-terre tax in New York City, which is imposed on non-primary, second homes valued at $1 million or more. The tax sparked uproar from the ultra wealthy, including hedge fund mogul and Citadel CEO Ken Griffin, whose $240 million apartment in Manhattan was called out by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani.

In response, Griffin threatened to pull Citadel’s plan for a $6 billion office tower in Manhattan and relocate employees to Miami. His partner on the project, Steven Roth, went so far as to say the term “tax the rich” is “just as hateful as some disgusting racial slurs” when used with anger by politicians, The New York Times reported.

But for all the talk, Citadel eventually decided to stay, confirming it would continue with its plans for the Manhattan tower.

Advertisement

“We’re just really not seeing any declines in the millionaire population in New York State,” Emily Eisner, executive director of the Fiscal Policy Institute, shared with Fortune. She said millionaire households aren’t sensitive to the state’s tax rates because the taxes simply aren’t high enough to be a cause of concern.

Must Read

Alternatives to higher tax systems

Wealthy people threatening to leave when taxes are raised has become a common story. And even if it’s just an empty threat, this development raised a debate about alternatives to a graduated tax system, which means taxes are progressive and rates increase as one’s taxable income increases.

A Cato Institute briefing paper published on Sept. 15 found states that implement flat taxes — a single, identical tax regardless of income — saw faster growth, higher incomes and better fiscal outcomes in the years following the reform.

According to the paper, states converting from graduated to flat tax systems saw “roughly one percentage point faster growth in per capita income and state GDP four years after the reform.” That’s nearly $4,000 more in income per resident.

Colorado was the first state to switch to a flat tax system in 1987 and saw per capita income rise about 5% higher a decade later.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Rinna Diamantakos Contributing Editor

Rinna Diamantakos is a contributing editor at Moneywise.com. A versatile journalist, she has experience as a writer, editor and producer. Her work has focused on politics, business and financial news.

more from Rinna Diamantakos

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.