• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Economy
Donald Trump Spencer Platt/Getty Images

‘They’ve been very irresponsible’: Donald Trump warned Google will be ‘close to shut down’ — now the Justice Department considers breaking up the search engine giant

With a market capitalization exceeding $2 trillion, Google’s parent company, Alphabet (GOOGL), stands as a dominant force in the tech industry. However, this dominance has drawn increasing scrutiny, as the company faces mounting pressure from antitrust authorities.

Former president Donald Trump has also weighed in with a stark warning for the tech giant.

Advertisement

“Google has been very bad, they’ve been very irresponsible, and I have a feeling that Google is going to be close to shut down, because I don’t think Congress is going to take it,” Trump said during a recent interview with Fox’s Maria Bartiromo.

Trump’s remarks followed his observation that Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg had called after the assassination attempt in Pennsylvania, while "nobody called from Google." He further cautioned that the company “has to be careful.”

Meanwhile, authorities have begun taking action.

‘Google is a monopolist’?

In August, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google violated antitrust laws through its search business, declaring the tech giant a “monopolist.”

“After having carefully considered and weighed the witness testimony and evidence, the court reaches the following conclusion: Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly. It has violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act,” Mehta wrote.

The ruling pointed to Google’s immense market power, with the Department of Justice highlighting its “immense revenues and large profit margins.” Google commands an 89.2% share of the general search services market by query volume, a figure that jumps to 94.9% on mobile devices. The company has held an over 80% share since at least 2009.

The White House praised the decision.

Advertisement

“This pro-competition ruling is a victory for the American people,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said in a statement. “As President Biden and Vice President Harris have long said, Americans deserve an internet that is free, fair, and open for competition.”

Google’s president of global affairs, Kent Walker, responded by announcing the company’s intention to appeal.

“As this process continues, we will remain focused on making products that people find helpful and easy to use,” Walker wrote in a post on X.

Search plays a pivotal role for both Google and its parent company, Alphabet. In 2023, "Google Search & other" generated $175 billion, representing a significant 57% of Alphabet's total revenue.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Breaking up Google?

The DOJ recently proposed significant remedies to curb Google’s power in the search engine market, including the possibility of breaking up the tech giant.

According to a new court filing, the DOJ is “considering behavioral and structural remedies that would prevent Google from using products such as Chrome, Play, and Android to advantage Google search and Google search-related products and features — including emerging search access points and features, such as artificial intelligence — over rivals or new entrants.”

Advertisement

The DOJ is also exploring measures to restrict or eliminate default search engine agreements, preinstallation deals, and revenue-sharing arrangements tied to Google’s search products. Google currently has high-profile search agreements with Apple’s iPhone and Samsung devices. One potential remedy is introducing a “choice screen,” which would allow users to choose from a range of alternative search engines.

Google’s vice president of regulatory affairs, Lee-Anne Mulholland, called the DOJ’s proposals “radical” and criticized the department for overreach.

“This case is about a set of search distribution contracts. Rather than focus on that, the government seems to be pursuing a sweeping agenda that will impact numerous industries and products, with significant unintended consequences for consumers, businesses, and American competitiveness,” Mulholland wrote in a blog post.

Mulholland emphasized that Google has invested billions of dollars into Chrome and Android, arguing that few companies would have the resources or incentive to maintain them as open-source platforms or to invest at the scale Google has. "Splitting off Chrome or Android would break them — along with many other things," she warned.

Alphabet shares initially dropped following news of the potential breakup, but the decline was short-lived. Year to date, the stock is up 19%, with a 168% gain over the past five years.

Despite the DOJ's suggestions, some experts remain skeptical about a breakup. Daniel Ives, managing director and senior equity analyst at Wedbush Securities, said that despite the antitrust scrutiny, a breakup of Google is "unlikely at this point" and that Google “will battle this in the courts for years."

You May Also Like

Share this:
Jing Pan Investment Reporter

Jing is an investment reporter for MoneyWise. He is an avid advocate of investing for passive income. Despite the ups and downs he’s been through with the markets, Jing believes that you can generate a steadily increasing income stream by investing in high quality companies.

more from Jing Pan

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.