The Federal Reserve’s latest rate hike was supposed to help bring inflation back under control. Billionaire investor Bill Ackman thinks it could do the opposite, arguing that the enormous sums being poured into artificial intelligence have changed how higher borrowing costs could affect the economy.
In a September 24 post on X, Ackman said the Fed may have “just made a mistake” by raising interest rates by 25 basis points to 4.0% at its September policy meeting. He argued that the central bank’s usual inflation-fighting tools may not work when companies are racing to build AI infrastructure.
Normally, higher rates curb inflation by reducing borrowing, investment and overall demand. But Ackman argues that the potential returns from winning the AI race are so enormous that companies will keep spending heavily on data centers and computing power even as financing becomes more expensive.
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
“Why won’t higher rates at this unique moment in history therefore lead to more inflation as interest costs are embedded in everything?” Ackman asked.
The result, Ackman argues, could be a vicious cycle where higher rates fuel inflation, prompting the Fed to raise rates again. His warning comes as the hyperscalers, Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOGL), Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), are expected to spend at least $650 billion this year on AI-related investments, according to Bridgewater Associates data.
The spending boom extends well beyond Big Tech. Gartner estimates that worldwide AI spending could reach $2.7 trillion this year alone.[a]
AI boom complicates the Fed’s inflation problem
The Fed’s September rate hike comes as inflation has reignited this year following the Iran war and resulting energy crisis, with higher energy costs pushing up headline measures such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Index.
Inflation had plateaued before the latest energy shock, but it never returned to the Fed’s 2% target. Its renewed rise gave policymakers a major impetus to raise rates.
In fact, inflation has remained above the central bank’s target for 66 consecutive months[b] based on CPI and 65 months based on core PCE, the central bank’s preferred inflation gauge, according to the Mises Institute. Under the conventional monetary policy playbook, that persistence calls for higher interest rates.
However, as Moody’s Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi argued, the usual policy response may be less relevant today. The central bank is confronting an increasingly divided economy, with AI investment driving growth while other parts of the economy are already struggling.
Echoing Ackman’s concerns, Zandi warned before the September meeting that raising rates would be a “mistake.” Bringing inflation back to target, he argued, could require the Fed to either slow AI investment or put even more strain on the rest of the economy. [c]
“The challenge is even more complicated because AI-related investment appears to be powering the economy, while the non-AI economy is already struggling,” Zandi said in a September 13 X post. “To hit its inflation objective, the Fed either needs to rein in the AI boom or put even more pressure on the rest of the economy. Neither is a good outcome.”
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
More rate hikes are expected
Despite the concerns raised by Ackman and Zandi, Fed officials are signaling that the September rate hike may not be the last.
New York Fed President John Williams said this week it would be “reasonable” to expect another rate hike this year. Philadelphia Fed President Anna Paulson went further, saying “modest further tightening” may be warranted if inflation remains elevated. Other officials focused on the risks keeping inflation high, with Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack warning about continued supply shocks and Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin pointing to price pressures beyond energy.
Williams, Paulson and Barkin’s comments arguably carry the most weight, as they are voting members of this year’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC)[d], the body tasked with setting interest rates. All three backed the September rate hike[e].
Markets are already preparing for another increase. Economists at Goldman Sachs expect the Fed to hike again at its Oct. 27-28 meeting, although that prediction hinges on oil prices, while 30-day fed funds futures imply a 64% probability of an increase, according to CME Group’s FedWatch Tool.
[a]From Gartner:
“Worldwide spending on AI is forecast to total $2.7 trillion in 2026, a 49.5% increase year-over-year, according to Gartner, Inc., a business and technology insights company.”
[b]The Fed’s 2% target is widely known. You can count the blue line here. CPI has been above 2% since March 2021. That’s 66 months through August 2026.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=rocU
Charlie Bilello has also been keeping track:
https://x.com/charliebilello/status/2099156384050815394
[c]The interpretation and quote are from Zandi’s X post below:
https://x.com/Markzandi/status/2099224282303746397
[d]https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomc.htm
Barkin is an “alternate member” this year.
[e]The September rate hike was unanimous:
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/16/fed-rate-decision-september-2026.html
“The FOMC approved the move unanimously after three members favored a hike at the July meeting.”
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Sam Bourgi is a financial markets specialist with over a decade of experience covering investing, economics and digital assets. His work has been cited by U.S. Congress, the DOJ, the Bank for International Settlements, Bloomberg, Reuters, CNBC, Fox and Newsweek, as well as academic institutions.
