A nest egg of $600,000 may seem like a lot — until you start considering whether it can support you for the next 25 years or more. That's the scenario you'd be looking at if you were 55 years old with that much in the bank and hoping for an early retirement.
Of course, you don't want to run short of money if you retire early — but you also don't want to put off your departure from the workforce longer than necessary. To decide whether handing in your notice is a good idea, let's consider whether it's feasible to retire with $600,000 in savings in America.
How much income will your nest egg produce?
Whether you can retire early with $600,000 depends how much income your savings and Social Security produce versus how much you'll need to live on.
Income from investments depends on your portfolio performance and your withdrawal strategy. You can't take out too much or earn returns that are too low or you'll risk going broke.
If you follow the 4% rule, with $600,000 in savings you can withdraw $24,000 annually (adjusting for inflation). A portion of your remaining nest egg can be put toward safe investments, such as an S&P 500 index fund. The average annual return of the S&P 500 since 1957, assuming a reinvestment of all dividends, has been 10.48%, according to the Official Data Foundation.
It's also a good idea to maintain an emergency fund in case of any unexpected medical or housing expenses.
But considering you can't claim Social Security until age 62 at the earliest (more on this later), and withdrawals from IRA accounts may be subject to additional taxes until you're 59-and-a-half years old, retiring early might require you to dig more deeply into other savings at first which can be risky. The IRS rule of 55 may allow 401(k) penalty-free withdrawals if you leave your job in the year you turn 55 or later.
Building a dividend portfolio is another strategy that can lower risk while receiving passive income. The goal is to live off the passive income from dividends and not touch your principal. With the right investments, you could theoretically generate substantial yields that will last as long as you need them.
To succeed at this approach, you may need to keep a large percentage of your portfolio in stocks and you must carefully select a diversified mix of dividend paying stocks. Energy, real estate and utility companies, for example, often pay out high dividends, but it pays to look at the company's long-term growth potential and not just focus on yields alone.
If you're a confident investor taking this approach, $600,000 might produce enough for early retirement. However, you'll need the knowledge to put together your dividend portfolio or help from an adviser with the necessary skills.
Must Read
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Robert Kiyosaki begs investors not to miss this ‘explosion’ — says this 1 asset will surge 400% in a year
- Vanguard reveals what could be coming for U.S. stocks, and it’s raising alarm bells for retirees. Here’s why and how to protect yourself
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
How much income will Social Security produce?
The good news is, your savings and investments won't be your only income source. You'll have Social Security, too. Unfortunately, benefits aren't available until age 62 at the earliest.
When you claim Social Security also determines your benefit. Claiming at full retirement age (FRA) — between ages 66 and 67, depending on when you were born — will allow you to receive the entirety of the benefit you earned during your working years. If you decide to receive checks early, you could be penalized up to 30% — but if you delay benefits until after your FRA, you can receive even more money each month, around 8% more per year, if you wait up until age 70.
The longer you wait to claim benefits, the more years you'll have to rely on savings. But the sooner you file, the less monthly income Social Security offers. For example, if you claimed at 62, as of December, the average monthly benefit was just $1,298, according to the Social Security Administration.
With health care bills to cover, plus years of retirement on the horizon, attempting to live on under $40,000 a year combined from Social Security and savings is going to be tough. So, unless you come up with an effective withdrawal strategy, your Social Security check is well above average or you have other income sources, you may want to stick it out on the job for a few extra years to bulk up your savings.
Correction, Nov. 25, 2024: This article has been updated to include that early withdrawals from IRA accounts may be subject to additional tax penalties, while the IRS rule of 55 applies to 401(k) accounts.
You May Also Like
- Turning 50 with $0 saved for retirement? Most people don’t realize they’re actually just entering their prime earning decade. Here are 6 ways to catch up fast
- This 20-year-old lotto winner refused $1M in cash and chose $1,000/week for life. Now she’s getting slammed for it. Which option would you pick?
- Warren Buffett used these 8 repeatable money rules to turn $9,800 into a $150B fortune. Start using them today to get rich (and stay rich)
- Here are 5 easy ways to own multiple properties like Bezos and Beyoncé. You can start with $10 (and no, you don’t have to manage a single thing)
Christy Bieber has 15 years of experience as a personal finance and legal writer. She has written for many publications including Forbes, Kilplinger, CNN, WSJ, Credit Karma, Insurify and more.
