Apr 20, 2026
Marriage is a meeting of hearts. And finances. And all that comes with it. For some, that could mean bringing great wealth, while for others, great baggage.
Imagine Ken and Karen, who meet in midlife, each on their second marriage — but first time getting love right. When you know you know. And when you're 50-something, there's no time to waste. So, they jumped right in.
Advertisement
The problem is, Ken filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, so he could save his home from foreclosure. He was paying $300 per month in repayments, which was manageable on his $45,000 salary in Missouri. That was 8% of his pre-tax take-home pay. Not always easy, but doable.
But because his wife, Karen, makes $74,000, the court has increased the repayment to $2,000 a month — 20% on their household pre-tax income. While Ken expected an increase, he did not foresee this.
Ken's got another 18 months left until it's paid off. Did he compromise their honeymoon period, or worse, their financial future?
How the court calculates Chapter 13
A chapter 13 bankruptcy is also called a wage earner's plan. Once married, this takes into account the spouse and the household's financial position (1). It calculates a debtor's disposable income, as determined by the Missouri Means Test for bankruptcy (2), which Ken and Karen were above.
While strangers on the internet tell Ken to "just get the marriage annulled" and get remarried once the bankruptcy is finalized, that's not what they want to do. It's also not the smartest idea to risk being perceived as gaming the system, which could cause more trouble.
Ken and Karen should contact a bankruptcy attorney immediately to evaluate the change in their financial situation and file a motion to change the plan. All expenses should be accounted for to make a case for a lower payment.
There are other instances (3), like a hardship discharge or a temporary suspension of payments. Switching to Chapter 7 isn't possible because Ken's income is above the means test. Ken also needs to factor in the attorney's fees, which could be costly.
Advertisement
Either way, Ken and Karen should get all their documents in order — pay stubs, tax returns and amended financials organized — to decide if a plan modification is justified. A marriage might be scrutinized more (4), because the income boost is predictable.
Must Read
- You can now build wealth like a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to chase down rent or take 3 A.M tenant calls
- Goldman Sachs used to hoard prime real estate deals for the ultrarich. Two ex-analysts just opened the door for $250
- Robert Kiyosaki begs investors not to miss this ‘explosion’ — says this 1 asset will surge 400% in a year
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Sacrifice now for stability later
The standard, 'earn more, spend less' advice gets tricky here. The more Ken earns, the more he'll pay. The less he earns, the less he'll pay.
Ken would benefit from changing his perspective about this moment. It's a time to resolve his debts, not to get ahead financially. If he can knuckle down for the next 18 months, he'll be clear.
The couple might be better off redirecting those attorney fees to a financial planner and marriage counselor, to help them navigate short-term. Maybe Ken can adjust his personal spending to cover more of the additional $1,700 per month, so the financial burden falls mostly on him.
Or they could view it as their first big challenge starting a long life together, and handling it as a team, knowing it's temporary.
Article Sources
We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our ethics and guidelines.
United States Courts (1); Missouri Bankruptcy (2); Lauter Law (3); Vohwinkel Law (4)
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
- Robert Kiyosaki issues grim warning for baby boomers. Many could be ‘wiped out’ and homeless ‘all over’ the country. How to protect yourself now
Amanda Smith is an Australian freelance journalist and writer based in the New York City area who reports on culture/society, technology, and health.
