Michael Burry of The Big Short fame has warned that the AI boom has been inflated by shaky accounting assumptions. Fellow investor Steve Eisman disagrees, arguing that the bigger risk lies elsewhere.
In a recent appearance on the New Money podcast, Eisman, who like Burry famously profited from the subprime mortgage collapse in 2008, pushed back on Burry’s argument that major tech companies are making profits look better by extending the depreciation schedules of AI chips that could become obsolete much sooner.
In accounting, depreciation spreads the cost of equipment over its “expected useful life,” so extending that lifespan lowers the annual expense recorded against earnings and, potentially, increases reported profits.
Thanks for subscribing!
Invest smarter with our free newsletter.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
Burry has estimated that between 2026 and 2028, hyperscalers will understate depreciation by more than $175 billion, according to Business Insider. And while Eisman accepts the accounting logic, he thinks Burry is putting too much weight behind it.
“With all due respect to Michael, I think his argument is too academic,” Eisman said, claiming that older AI chips aren’t losing their value nearly as quickly as Burry assumes. Demand for computing power remains so strong that previous generations of GPUs are still finding customers, even as newer and more powerful chips reach the market, often with long order backlogs.
As Business Insider reported, CoreWeave offers a striking example. The AI infrastructure company recently disclosed a contract for Nvidia A100 GPUs that runs through 2029, even though the chips were introduced six years ago. CoreWeave CEO Michael Intrator said pricing for some older-generation hardware remains at or above levels seen years ago.
IREN, another crypto miner-turned-AI data center operator, has made a similar observation. On a recent earnings call, management said older GPUs remain in strong demand because the market is still undersupplied.
For Eisman, chip depreciation is a secondary concern. If AI demand keeps growing, he argues that stretching a chip’s useful life from three or four years to five or six isn’t a serious problem. But that doesn’t mean Eisman thinks the AI trade is safe. In fact, he sees a much bigger vulnerability elsewhere.
Two companies underpin the entire AI boom
Major tech companies are forecast to spend as much as $750 billion on AI this year, a figure that could nearly double to $1.4 trillion in 2027, according to Goldman Sachs estimates. But Eisman believes much of that spending ultimately depends on two companies: OpenAI and Anthropic.
Much of that dependence can be seen throughout the AI supply chain. At Nvidia, which dominates the market for AI chips, Eisman pointed to a company filing showing that 70% of its accounts receivable came from just five customers. He called that a “warning flag.”
The concentration risk extends to hyperscalers buying Nvidia’s chips. Eisman said roughly 70% of the AI revenue generated by Microsoft, Meta, Amazon and Alphabet comes from OpenAI and Anthropic, equivalent to about 25% to 30% of their overall cloud revenue. At Oracle, he said roughly half of the company’s remaining performance obligations, a measure of contracted future revenue, are tied to OpenAI.
“The entire chain from Nvidia to the hyperscalers all the way down […] rests on the future health and growth of Anthropic and OpenAI,” Eisman warned.
If OpenAI were to fail and “the whole chain goes in reverse,” he warned there could be a “massive correction” across the AI trade.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Eisman’s preferred AI investment
Ironically, Eisman isn’t necessarily bearish on AI. Quite the contrary.
He prefers the “picks and shovels” companies being paid to build the infrastructure behind the AI transition, rather than OpenAI, Anthropic and other large language model developers. His reasoning is that model developers have few competitive “moats,” while hundreds of billions of dollars in AI spending are flowing to the companies supplying the equipment and power infrastructure needed to build and operate data centers.
“I wouldn’t invest in an LLM because I just think, as I said ... there are no moats,” Eisman said.
In addition to Nvidia, Eisman pointed to Micron Technology, GE Vernova, Arista Networks, Cisco Systems and Eaton as examples of companies benefiting from that spending.
One way investors can gain exposure to this “picks and shovels” theme is through the Tema Electrification ETF, which holds companies positioned to benefit from rising electricity demand and upgrades to the power grid, including Eisman picks Eaton and GE Vernova. VOLT has gained more than 29% this year, according to Yahoo Finance data. While this trails the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, the fund has outpaced the broader stock market.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Sam Bourgi is a US based financial markets specialist with over a decade of experience covering investing, economics and digital assets. His work has been cited by Congress, the DOJ, the Bank for International Settlements, Bloomberg, Reuters, CNBC, Fox and Newsweek, as well as academic institutions.
