Wealthy people don’t always spend all of their money on nice houses and cars. Some try to pay their good fortune forward by allocating a portion of their assets to charity.
In this regard, donor-advised funds, or DAFs, have become more popular in recent years. Between 2014 and 2023, analysis shows the total value of DAF assets rose from $70 billion to more than $251 billion.
DAFs offer donors a world of tax benefits. But those benefits may be coming at the expense of American taxpayers on a whole.
The appeal of DAFs
A DAF is a fund that’s set up to support charitable organizations. DAFs can be funded with cash, stocks, or other assets of value.
DAFs are similar to foundations in that they are funded for the express purpose of charitable giving. Donors to DAFs are able to dictate which organizations become the recipients of those funds.
The benefit of funding a DAF is that donors get an immediate tax break on the money that goes in. But that money doesn’t have to all be disbursed right away. Rather, with a DAF, funds can be allocated to different organizations over time.
A big drawback of DAFs is that there can be hefty administration fees. The Fidelity Charitable Giving Account, for example, has a fee structure that charges the greater of 0.60% or $100 for up to $500,000 in assets, with additional fees for higher balances. A $500,000 balance would incur a $3,000 fee.
Also, DAFs don’t always do a great job of disclosing all of their fees. Those fees benefit the financial institutions that house these funds, and they take away from the amount that ends up going to charitable organizations.
It’s also worth noting that DAF contributions are irrevocable. By contrast, a revocable living trust (a fairly popular estate-planning tool among the wealthy and non-wealthy alike) allows individuals to retain control over their assets during their lifetime.
Must Read
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — are you doing the same?
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Robert Kiyosaki says this 1 asset will surge 400% in a year and begs investors not to miss this ‘explosion’
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
The big problem with DAFs
DAFs, in theory, are a good thing — they’re funds designed to benefit charities over time. But there are problems with DAFs that policymakers may need to address.
Although DAFs are similar to foundations, they have different requirements. Foundations have to disburse at least 5% of their assets each year. DAFs do not.
Also, DAFs offer donors a tax break beyond a typical charitable donation. That’s because DAFs allow donors to avoid capital gains taxes on assets that appreciate in value from when they’re acquired.
Say you bought stocks for $10,000 and their value rises to $20,000. You could liquidate that position for cash, donate $20,000, and get a $20,000 tax deduction. But you’d also be liable for $10,000 in capital gains taxes.
With a DAF, you can donate your $20,000 worth of stock, and you’ll get the full $20,000 deduction. You also won’t have to pay capital gains taxes on those assets if you’re donating your stocks directly.
But these larger tax breaks that wealthy Americans are poised to take advantage of have the potential to seriously eat into government revenue. Not only that, but DAF donors get the benefit of an immediate tax write-off even if their money is not disbursed to a charity for years.
Policymakers are looking to tighten up the rules around DAFs to allow for a more timely distribution of funds. The Initiative to Accelerate Charitable Giving is pushing to have DAF donors receive an upfront tax break only if funds are given away within 15 years of when they’re donated.
Philanthropy.com reports that between 2018 and 2023, DAFs, along with other philanthropy groups, spent $11 million to block legislation designed to force them to distribute more to charity. This lends to the sentiment that DAFs may be more of a tax shelter than an opportunity to actually do good.
You May Also Like
- Turning 50 with $0 saved for retirement? Most people don’t realize they’re actually just entering their prime earning decade. Here are 6 ways to catch up fast
- Inside a $1B real estate fund offering access to thousands of income-producing rental properties — with flexible minimums starting at $10
- Vanguard’s outlook on U.S. stocks is raising alarm bells for retirees. Here’s why and how to protect yourself
- Here are 5 easy ways to own multiple properties like Bezos and Beyoncé. You can start with $10 (and no, you don’t have to manage a single thing)
Maurie Backman has been writing professionally for well over a decade. Since becoming a full-time writer, she's produced thousands of articles on topics ranging from Social Security to investing to real estate.
