May 20, 2025
If you're heading into your golden years without a sizable "just-in-case" fund, you could be walking a financial tightrope without a safety net.
Suze Orman expressed this concern during a recent episode of her Women & Money podcast. The personal finance expert believes seniors should save enough money to cover three-to-five years’ worth of living expenses in liquid accounts that are shielded from stock market turbulence and can be easily cashed out without having to sell any assets.
Advertisement
Her reasons for exercising such caution are simple: Orman warns that when the stock market crashes, recovery isn't always swift. In fact, it can take years for the market to rebound. For retirees who rely on investments to cover their monthly bills, a downturn could force them to sell at a steep loss just to survive.
“It’s not always that stocks go down and bonds go up, or bonds go down and therefore stocks go up,” Orman said on the podcast. “Sometimes everything can go down.”
Orman’s just-in-case fund is a strategy that, on paper, screams financial wisdom. But is it realistic for the average American?
Orman’s ideal cushion is out of reach for many
According to the Federal Reserve’s 2022 Survey of Consumer Finances, the average retirement savings for American families is roughly $333,940.
Diving deeper, households headed by those under 35 are looking at a median retirement savings of just $18,880, while the median for those aged 65–74 is about $200,000. That makes Orman’s ideal "cushion" out of reach for many typical Americans.
The upside of Orman’s advice is clear: a five-year just-in-case fund provides a powerful buffer against market volatility, giving retirees the peace of mind that comes with not having to sell stocks in a slump. It’s a form of self-insurance that could save thousands in losses during bear markets and could help retirees with sleeping better at night.
But the downsides are just as real. Building up three-to-five years’ worth of cash funds, which likely means saving hundreds of thousands of dollars, requires one to have a level of wealth that many Americans just don’t have.
Plus, keeping so much cash on the sidelines comes with a hefty opportunity cost, since that money could be working harder in stocks or other investments with a higher yield.
Must Read
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Robert Kiyosaki begs investors not to miss this ‘explosion’ — says this 1 asset will surge 400% in a year
- Vanguard reveals what could be coming for U.S. stocks, and it’s raising alarm bells for retirees. Here’s why and how to protect yourself
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Balanced options for saving
Since Orman’s ideal just-in-case fund seems to be out of reach for many Americans, it’s key to consider a more balanced, attainable approach to saving for retirement.
Advertisement
First, try to figure out how much cash savings you want on hand — maybe one-to-two years' worth of living expenses — as well as how much money you'll need to save for retirement. Keep in mind that for many retirees, you don’t need to replace 100% of your pre-retirement income because once you stop working, some expenses disappear along with your commute.
You no longer need to put money away for retirement because that’s already taken care of. And the daily costs tied to working — like gas, public transit, office attire and going out for lunch — often vanish when you call it a career. Furthermore, if you’ve paid off your mortgage by the time you retire, that’s another major bill off your plate.
You can use the federal government’s retirement planner to help with crunching the numbers.
Building a smaller emergency fund — which is basically the same thing as a just-in-case fund — in high-yield savings accounts or short-term bond funds can offer liquidity without locking up a large chunk of your nest egg.
Another popular approach is the “retirement bucket strategy.” This is where you divide your savings into short-, mid-, and long-term buckets based on when you'll need the money. This method lets you tap into safer investments early in retirement while giving riskier assets time to grow before you need them.
Orman’s five-year just-in-case fund may be the gold standard for retirement security, but for many Americans it’s more of a dream than a realistic plan.
But her underlying message is that retirees shouldn't leave their retirement fate to the whims of the stock market. Whether it’s a five-year just-in-case fund or a scaled-back alternative, building a cash cushion could be the smartest move you make for your future self.
You May Also Like
- Turning 50 with $0 saved for retirement? Most people don’t realize they’re actually just entering their prime earning decade. Here are 6 ways to catch up fast
- This 20-year-old lotto winner refused $1M in cash and chose $1,000/week for life. Now she’s getting slammed for it. Which option would you pick?
- Warren Buffett used these 8 repeatable money rules to turn $9,800 into a $150B fortune. Start using them today to get rich (and stay rich)
- Here are 5 easy ways to own multiple properties like Bezos and Beyoncé. You can start with $10 (and no, you don’t have to manage a single thing)
Jessica is a freelance writer with a professional background in economic development and small business consulting. She has a Bachelor of Arts in Communications and Sociology and is completing her Publishing Certificate.
