Follow us on Google for more Moneywise news
Add us on GoogleCome April 2027, billionaire investor Peter Thiel can start withdrawing from a Roth IRA that held $5 billion the last time anyone counted — and he won’t owe a dollar of federal income tax on it.
He opened the account in 1999, before he was a billionaire, with less than $2,000 — the most anyone could contribute back then — and then used it to buy into the startup that became PayPal, according to IRS records obtained by ProPublica.
Congress created the Roth IRA to help regular workers save for retirement. On July 22, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore)., and Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass) introduced a bill to stop accounts like Thiel’s from ever getting that big.
Thanks for subscribing!
Retire on your terms — we'll show you how.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
But one economist wants to go even further — he wants the tax break, and your retirement accounts, killed entirely.
What the Wyden-Neal bill would do
The bill itself targets a narrow group: people earning more than $400,000 a year ($450,000 for couples) who hold more than $10 million across their IRAs, Roth accounts and 401(k)s. They wouldn’t be able to add another dollar to their account. Each year they’d withdraw half of everything above $10 million and pay income tax on it. Any amount above $20 million would have to be fully withdrawn.
New Joint Committee on Taxation data released with the bill shows more than 32,000 individuals each held over $10 million in tax-sheltered retirement accounts at the end of 2024, averaging $17 million. At the very top, 208 people held $85.1 billion between them — $409 million each.
How does anyone get $10 million into an account like that? Contributions can’t do it — the annual IRA limit was $2,000 when Thiel opened his, and it’s $7,500 for 2026 ($8,600 for those 50 and over). The move is to put in something worth almost nothing, then wait for it to climb.
That depends on a low valuation, which is exactly where the IRS runs into trouble. A 2014 Government Accountability Office report found the agency already going after undervalued assets inside IRAs, through audits that drag and are hard to win in court, because nobody can price a private company with certainty.
“Individuals worth hundreds of millions or billions of dollars do not need any taxpayer subsidy to save,” said Wyden, ranking Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, in a media release.
This idea keeps coming back. Obama proposed a cap in 2013, a version died with the Build Back Better Act in 2021 and Biden revived it in his fiscal 2024 budget. None of it became law. This version likely won’t either, not with Republicans holding both chambers. But if Democrats flip the House or Senate in November, Neal, House Ways and Means Committee ranking member, and Wyden would chair the two committees that write tax law.
Must Read
- The ultra-rich use these 5 real estate strategies to build wealth while they sleep — you can start with just $100
- Here’s the average income of Americans by age in 2026. Are you keeping up or falling behind?
- Insurance companies profit most from drivers who auto-renew without shopping around. Comparing 100+ quotes takes 2 minutes and costs nothing
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Why one economist wants the tax break gone for everyone
Andrew Biggs once rose to principal deputy commissioner at the Social Security Administration — the agency’s No. 2 job. He’s now a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. In 2024, he and Boston College economist Alicia Munnell published a brief arguing the government should stop subsidizing retirement accounts and send the money to Social Security. The Treasury put the cost of the break at about $185 billion in 2020 alone.
“If I were in charge, I wouldn’t have the tax preference at all,” Biggs told USA TODAY.
But not everyone buys it. Economists at Biggs’ own institute have argued that workers who build private savings should lean less on government programs later in life.
Unfortunately, the retirement account tax break does little to raise how much the average person saves. High earners just move money they were already setting aside into accounts where it grows untaxed. What works is signing people up by default. Britain started doing that in 2012, and by 2024 nine in 10 eligible workers were paying into a workplace pension, according to the Department for Work and Pensions.
Biggs has also been a proponent of automatic enrollment in workplace retirement plans, noting in a National Association of Plan Advisors report, “If a big concern people have is that not enough Americans either offer a retirement plan or participate, something like the U.K. structure is how you do it.”
Who the current tax break actually helps
Around half of American households — 54.3% — had any retirement account at all in 2022, according to a Congressional Research Service analysis of Federal Reserve data. Among those nearing retirement with a 401(k), median combined 401(k) and IRA balances reached $204,000, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. Those gains went mostly to higher earners.
If you’re one of the roughly half of households with no retirement account at all, this tax break has never touched you. And if you do have one, the deduction on your contributions is the same one Biggs wants to end — by his math, it was never doing much for you anyway.
A law professor who has spent years arguing these accounts should be capped put it bluntly. Norman Stein, professor emeritus at Drexel University’s Thomas R. Kline School of Law, told USA TODAY the system is “just backward.”
Still, some of this is shifting anyway. A 2022 law now requires most new 401(k) plans to enroll workers automatically, a rule that kicked in last year. And on April 30, President Donald Trump signed an executive order launching TrumpIRA.gov, where workers without a workplace plan can open an IRA and collect a federal match worth up to $1,000. It’s designed to go into effect in 2027.
For now the tax break stands, Thiel’s account keeps compounding and the 32,000 people this bill targets can keep saving.
A spokesperson for Thiel had not responded to a request for comment by the time of publication.
You May Also Like
- JP Morgan sees gold hitting $6,000/oz before 2027 — and a Gold IRA lets you hold the physical metal while deferring the tax bill. Get your free guide from Priority Gold
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
Godwin Oluponmile is a content specialist, SEO strategist and copywriter with seven years of expertise in finance, Web 3.0, B2B SaaS and technology. His work has been featured in publications such as Entrepreneur, HackerNoon, Blocktelegraph and Benzinga.
