Jun 3, 2025
President Donald Trump's newly appointed housing chief has made waves by launching a dramatic shakeup at mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, potentially reshaping America's mortgage market.
William Pulte, a private equity executive whose family founded one of the country’s largest homebuilding companies, took charge of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) on March 13. The regulator is responsible for overseeing both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Pulte wasted no time in executing a dramatic purge of leadership at both mortgage giants.
Advertisement
According to multiple reports, a number of board members across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were swiftly replaced, with Pulte installing himself as chairman of both entities. Freddie Mac’s CEO Diana Reid, a long-serving executive, was also removed — sending a clear message about the scope and seriousness of this transformation.
So, what do these abrupt changes signal for the housing market and the mortgages of millions of American homeowners?
Privatization speculation
Pulte’s bold moves have ignited speculation the Trump administration is pushing to privatize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In a Truth Social post on May 27, Trump said he was “working on taking these amazing companies public,” but also promised the government “will keep its implicit guarantees.”
Both are government-sponsored entities (GSEs) and have been under federal conservatorship since the 2008 financial crisis in which they were bailed out. Together, the companies back 70% of the mortgage market, according to The New York Times. Skeptics believe privatization would make buying a home more expensive in the midst of a housing affordability crisis.
“It would mean that mortgage rates would increase — definitely,” Laurie Goodman, founder of the Housing Finance Policy Center at the Urban Institute, a think tank in Washington, D.C., said to the news publication.
Meanwhile, privatization could be a boon for both investors and the federal government. Depending on the structure of the deal, privatizing could generate billions of dollars in revenue for an administration that’s focused on cutting down wasteful spending across the board. Placing these companies in private hands would also free the government from potential future bailout obligations.
Following Trump’s recent post on Truth Social, however, Pulte told Bloomberg Television on May 29, “I don’t see any scenario where the president isn’t in control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.” Previously, he told CNN that “it’s critical to ensure any discussion about exiting conservatorship needs not only to ensure safety and soundness but how it would affect mortgage rates.”
Must Read
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Robert Kiyosaki begs investors not to miss this ‘explosion’ — says this 1 asset will surge 400% in a year
- Vanguard reveals what could be coming for U.S. stocks, and it’s raising alarm bells for retirees. Here’s why and how to protect yourself
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Impact on the housing market
Why do critics think privatizing these entities would increase borrowing rates? Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac don’t directly issue mortgages — rather they buy mortgages from lenders and package them for investors as securities. This maintains cash flow within the mortgage industry, allowing lenders to offer stable, affordable rates, experts say.
Advertisement
But if the federal government no longer backs these entities, their safety net goes with it.
“When the government is backing an entity's products and services, it helps to reduce risk, especially in the generating of loans,” Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek. “Removing it opens the door to higher interest rates for those looking to buy or refinance. It could also lead to more restrictive policies in even getting a loan, as lenders react more cautiously to some buyers.”
Increased rates could affect affordability, particularly for first-time buyers or those with modest incomes already stretched thin by soaring home prices.
As for homeowners with existing mortgages may also be affected if they ever want to refinance their loan. It may be less likely you can reduce your monthly payments if you’re struggling to get by.
The long-term impact of this housing shakeup remain uncertain, however, homebuyers and homeowners could serve themselves well by staying informed so they can navigate potential changes effectively.
You May Also Like
- Turning 50 with $0 saved for retirement? Most people don’t realize they’re actually just entering their prime earning decade. Here are 6 ways to catch up fast
- This 20-year-old lotto winner refused $1M in cash and chose $1,000/week for life. Now she’s getting slammed for it. Which option would you pick?
- Warren Buffett used these 8 repeatable money rules to turn $9,800 into a $150B fortune. Start using them today to get rich (and stay rich)
- Here are 5 easy ways to own multiple properties like Bezos and Beyoncé. You can start with $10 (and no, you don’t have to manage a single thing)
Chris Clark is a Kansas City–based freelance contributor for Moneywise, where he writes about the real financial choices facing everyday Americans—from saving for retirement to navigating housing and debt.
