• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

News
How could a simple text message result in a $4,400 fraud? FOX 26 Houston/YouTube

Wells Fargo customer lost $4,400 just hours after depositing a big check — and a legal loophole almost prevented her from getting it back. Here's why

A Houston woman paid a steep price, literally, for a simple bank deposit that she made at her local Wells Fargo branch.

Willie Delane told her local Fox 26 network that on September 15 she deposited a life insurance check totalling $10,000 into her Wells Fargo bank account.

Advertisement

“I've been with Wells Fargo for so long, years and years” she said in the story. This is why, when she received a text roughly nine hours later saying that there was something fishy with a transaction involving her account, she called customer service. (1)

According to Delane, the Wells Fargo rep said that they would freeze her account and cancel her bank card, with a replacement to be issued by mail.

The next morning, however, Delane discovered that her account was $4,400 short — the money was transferred from her savings account to her checking account, and then withdrawn.

She says she didn’t make the “teletransfer” but Wells Fargo claims she did, and at first refused to refund the money. But all's well that ends well — after the news report aired, Delane says she checked her account and Wells Fargo returned the missing funds to her account. (2)

How could a simple text message result in a $4,400 fraud? And how can you prevent it from happening to you?

The legal loophole that could cost you thousands

The CalCoast Times reports that, when contacting Wells Fargo about the text message she received, Delane called the customer service number listed in the message. (3) This could be a sticking point in the fraud case due to a law called Regulation E within the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA).

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), (4) Regulation E essentially protects Americans who fall victim to suspected fraud via an electronic transfer of funds from their financial institution. They add that if a case that falls under Regulation E is reported to a financial institution in a timely manner, then the institution must “promptly investigate” and “correct the error within one business day after determining that an error has occurred.”

That said, Consumer Reports (CR) points out that if a customer is “tricked and ends up authorizing money to be sent to scammers,” the banks are often no longer liable for reimbursing them. (5)

Advertisement

And not only that, but National Consumer Law Center senior attorney Carla Sanchez-Adams told CR that “Financial institutions across the board are not reimbursing consumers” in such situations but, rather, “fight(ing) tooth-and-nail to hold the consumer liable.”

CR adds that Wells Fargo faced multiple class-action lawsuits in recent years from victims of fraudulent wire transfers, while customers at other banks are falling prey as well.

The bank, for the record, says it’s investigating this most recent matter, though the Fox 26 story notes that Wells Fargo had previously claimed that Delane “made the transactions and the money will not be returned.”

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

How to fight back against financial fraud

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reported $12.5 billion in consumer fraud losses last year, a number, they said, that’s up 25% from 2023. (6) The fraud ranges from investment to imposter scams, with text messages proving the third most popular means of contact for the con after email and phone calls.

The FTC even created a database where you can track fraud losses in your state by age demographic. (7) For example, the first two quarters of 2025 in Delane’s home state of Texas saw fraud losses totalling more than $261 million, with the 60 to 69 year old age group losing the most total dollars (more than $56 million and counting).

That said there are ways to protect yourself and your money against financial fraud and scams — even as they get more sophisticated.

Advertisement

The FBI advises never clicking on links or downloading attachments in unsolicited emails or texts and, if you need to contact a financial institution or company associated with suspicious messages, look up their phone number on your own rather than using contact info provided by them. (8) They add that enabling two-factor/multi-factor authentication on your accounts adds another line of defense against fraudsters.

CR, meanwhile, says to never give out personal info to anyone soliciting it from any organization, whether they reach out by phone, text, email or other means. (4) Instead, they say, call the organization back yourself, using a contact number you find independently, to confirm the legitimacy of the request.

They also recommend only using secure payment methods such as credit cards or established services with anti-fraud mechanisms like PayPal, as otherwise “it may be nearly impossible to get your money back” if it’s stolen. As well, they suggest exercising caution when making wire transfers, and to make sure you know exactly to whom you’re sending the money.

Strange formatting, spelling and grammar errors in a message can also be a red flag for a scam. It’s good practice to monitor your accounts and never use the same password for more than one.

And if you do find yourself caught up in a scam, as Delane did, DataVisor, a global financial fraud prevention platform, suggests reporting it right away and reviewing your other accounts for any suspicious activity, as well as keeping records of all correspondence about the fraud case, which “can be helpful if there are disputes about the resolution of the issue.” (9)

Banks usually also have specific timeframes in which they’re required, by law, to complete an investigation, so DataVisor says that “Consumers should be aware of their right to receive provisional credit if the investigation takes more than 10 business days.”

Article sources

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our editorial ethics and guidelines.

FOX 26 Houston (1, 2) ; CalCoast Times (3); Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (4); Consumer Reports (5); Federal Trade Commission (6); Tableau Public (7); FBI (8); DataVisor (9)

You May Also Like

Share this:
Mike Crisolago Staff Reporter

Mike Crisolago is a Staff Reporter at Moneywise with more than 15 years of experience in the journalism industry as a writer, editor, content strategist and podcast host. His work has appeared in various Canadian print and digital publications including Zoomer magazine, Quill & Quire and Canadian Family, among others. He’s also served as a mentor to students in Centennial College’s journalism program.

more from Mike Crisolago

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.