• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
An anonymous bidder just won a seat at the table with Warren Buffett, Steph Curry and Ayesha Curry for a charity lunch this June. Ezra Shaw/Getty Images; Paul Morigi/Getty Images for Fortune/Time Inc

Someone just paid $9 million to have lunch with Warren Buffett and Steph Curry — why wealthy people are paying to access to celebrities

Someone just paid $9 million for lunch with Warren Buffett. Not for a private island getaway or a stake in Berkshire Hathaway — just a meal with the legendary investor, plus Golden State Warriors star Stephen Curry and his wife, entrepreneur Ayesha Curry.

A mystery bidder won the annual charity auction for Buffett's famed power lunch this week with a final bid of just over $9 million, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal (1). The lunch will take place June 24 in Omaha, Nebraska, and the winning bidder can bring up to seven guests.

Advertisement

The price tag may sound absurd, but Buffett's annual lunches have long occupied a unique place in the business world: part philanthropy, part networking opportunity and part status symbol for the ultra-wealthy.

The auction moved online in 2003 and winning bids have topped $1 million since 2008. Buffett has helped raise more than $50 million for Glide, the San Francisco nonprofit supported by his late first wife, Susie Buffett. This year's proceeds will be split between Glide and the Currys' Eat. Learn. Play. Foundation.

The final auction price for this year's lunch was notably lower than the record-setting $19 million bid in 2022, the last time Buffett participated in the event. Still, at $9 million, it remains one of the most expensive charity meals ever sold.

Why wealthy people pay millions for access

For most people, spending $9 million on lunch would sound financially reckless. But for ultra-wealthy entrepreneurs, hedge fund managers or crypto founders, access itself can function like an investment.

Buffett's lunches have historically attracted bidders hoping to gain proximity to one of the world's most respected investors and potentially open doors that might otherwise remain closed.

One example is Ted Weschler, a hedge fund manager, who won Buffett's charity lunch twice before eventually joining Berkshire Hathaway as an investment manager (2).

Advertisement

Crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun also famously won the charity lunch in 2019, later using the meeting as both a branding opportunity and a credibility boost for his blockchain company (3).

The phenomenon extends far beyond Buffett. In recent years, even political figures have embraced the strategy. President Donald Trump has offered private dinners and VIP experiences tied to campaign fundraising and meme coin dinners (4), while tech founders and influencers increasingly monetize exclusive communities and in-person events (5).

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Can networking really be worth millions?

For some buyers, the actual meal is secondary. The bigger draw is the opportunity to spend several hours in a small room with one of the world's most respected investors and potentially make connections that could prove valuable long after the lunch ends.

That doesn't mean this year's mystery bidder should expect to earn a role on Buffett's team. Buffett's lunch rules have historically allowed winners to discuss almost anything except what he might invest in next, Reuters reported (6).

So the value may be less about getting stock tips and more about access. Still, there's no guarantee a lunch will produce a financial return. For many bidders, Buffett's charity auction may function more as philanthropy, prestige and personal branding than a measurable investment. But the history of the event shows why the ultra-wealthy keep paying for access: sometimes the room itself is the asset.

Article Sources

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our ethics and guidelines.

The Wall Street Journal (1); CNBC (2),(3),(4); Digiday (5); Reuters (6)

You May Also Like

Share this:
Clay Halton Associate Editor

Clay Halton is an associate editor at Money.ca, covering a wide range of consumer-focused financial stories. He has over eight years of experience in digital publishing and has written and edited for outlets including PCMag and Investopedia.

more from Clay Halton

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.