A roughly $9 Old Navy maternity dress isn’t the kind of item you’d expect to ignite national debate.
But after Second Lady Usha Vance wore a fitted coral maternity dress during a Father’s Day episode of Storytime with the Second Lady on her YouTube channel, the budget-friendly piece found itself at the centre of a much bigger debate about motherhood, feminism and the image of women under the Trump administration.
Days after the episode aired, The New York Times published a piece titled The Politics and Power of the Pregnancy Image. In it, chief fashion critic Vanessa Friedman examined the growing visibility of pregnant women in President Donald Trump’s orbit, including Vance, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and Katie Miller, the wife of White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller.
Thanks for subscribing!
Read the best of Moneywise in 5 minutes or less.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
Friedman argues that bump-hugging maternity dresses and social media posts celebrating motherhood as “peak feminism” are helping shape a new visual language around family, fertility and conservative womanhood.
“Together, the women have created a notably consistent, and somewhat paradigm-shifting, picture of the White House’s family and fertility platform,” Friedman wrote.
The backlash and the bargain
Vance didn’t let the criticism go unanswered.
In a post on X, Usha shared a screenshot of the discounted Old Navy dress alongside a clip from the episode, poking fun at The New York Times’ analysis while revealing just how little she paid.
“Now that we know the political significance of my $8.75 coral maternity dress from Old Navy, can’t wait to hear what the New York Times has to say about my elastic-waistband pants and compression socks!” she wrote.
Many commenters applauded the Second Lady for choosing an affordable maternity outfit.
“Beautiful and frugal and relatable,” one wrote.
“You should be in charge of government spending,” another said.
Vance later shared a photo of her receipt, showing the dress had originally retailed for $49.99 before being marked down to $12.49. After applying an additional coupon, she paid just $8.75.
The viral attention has seemingly helped drive demand. The dress has since sold out on Old Navy’s website in every color and size.
Must Read
- The ultra-rich use these 5 real estate strategies to build wealth while they sleep — you can start with just $100
- Here’s the average income of Americans by age in 2026. Are you keeping up or falling behind?
- Insurance companies profit most from drivers who auto-renew without shopping around. Comparing 100+ quotes takes 2 minutes and costs nothing
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
A very public pregnancy
In an email to Moneywise, New York Times spokesperson Charlie Stadtlander wrote:
“We’re glad the Second Lady had a chance to read The Times’s reporting on fashion and pregnancy, which presented a fair and illuminating analysis of women in the Trump administration and their ownership of motherhood and image.”
Before the debate over Vance’s maternity wardrobe has unfolded online, she’s acknowledged that this pregnancy has been different from her previous three.
In an interview with NBC’s Kate Snow on Today, Vance said, unlike her last pregnancy, she’s had to “dress up a lot more.”
“I enjoyed my last pregnancy, there were a lot of sweatpants,” Vance said.
The Vances are expecting their fourth child in July. The baby will be the first baby born to a sitting U.S. vice president in modern American history.
You May Also Like
- JP Morgan sees gold hitting $6,000/oz before 2027 — and a Gold IRA lets you hold the physical metal while deferring the tax bill. Get your free guide from Priority Gold
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
Victoria Vesovski is a Toronto-based staff reporter at Moneywise covering personal finance, lifestyle and trending news. She holds degrees from the University of Toronto and New York University, and her work has appeared on platforms including Yahoo Finance, MSN Money and Apple News.
