• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
A man vaping on the street. Mike Kemp/Getty Images

'Poisoning American kids': Big Tobacco gave Trump PAC $5 million — and 5 days later, the FDA cleared flavored vapes. Critics are crying 'corruption'

On April 30, a subsidiary of tobacco giant Reynolds American cut a $5 million check to MAGA Inc., the super PAC backing President Donald Trump.

Two days later, a top Reynolds executive and two of the company's lobbyists had lunch with Trump at his Jupiter, Florida golf club. Two executives from rival tobacco company Altria joined them. The tobacco representatives expressed dissatisfaction with FDA regulation during the meal, according to The New York Times. Trump interrupted the conversation to call FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary. When Makary didn't pick up, Trump dialed Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services head Dr. Mehmet Oz. Three people briefed on the meeting told The New York Times that Trump complained to them about the agency's regulation of e-cigarettes (1).

Advertisement

Days after that $5 million donation, the FDA issued new guidance opening the door to flavored vapes — bypassing the agency's normal rulemaking process. A few days after that, Makary resigned, telling associates he could not in good conscience lead an agency that backed such a policy (1).

The timing has Democrats — and at least one Republican — calling it corruption, while others warn the real losers are American teenagers.

Five days, $5 million, one policy reversal

Campaign finance filings released on May 20 showed that a donation from Reynolds American's subsidiary brought the entity's total contributions to MAGA Inc. to $8 million. Reynolds' latest donation accounted for more than half of the $9.6 million MAGA Inc. raised in April.

The same subsidiary previously gave $10 million to a separate pro-Trump super PAC in 2024, contributed to Trump's $400 million White House ballroom fund, and a Reynolds executive was invited to an October White House dinner reserved for donors who gave $2.5 million or more (1).

The FDA's new guidance opens up the roughly $6 billion U.S. e-cigarette market — currently dominated by illegal Chinese disposables (2) — to major American tobacco companies looking to sell flavored vapes. It also allows higher nicotine levels in nicotine pouches and pledges a crackdown on illicit imports, an enforcement goal with bipartisan support in Congress. Guardrails ban cartoon characters and designs resembling toys, phones or gaming devices (3).

The Times found no definitive evidence linking the guidance to the donation, the lunch or specific lobbying, but called the policy a win for an industry that's spent years on the defensive (1).

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

What companies benefit

Reynolds stands to be a major beneficiary if it can get its own flavored products authorized. The Vuse maker is wholly owned by British American Tobacco (NYSE:BTI), the world's third-largest tobacco company by volume (4). The new guidance opens a pathway for Reynolds to apply for flavored Vuse approvals — Vuse is currently locked to tobacco and menthol — but as of now, no flavored Reynolds products have been authorized. Reynolds also makes Camel and Lucky Strike.

Altria Group (NYSE:MO) was also represented at the Jupiter lunch. It owns Philip Morris USA, makes Marlboro and gave $1 million to Trump's 2025 inaugural committee (5).

Advertisement

The first company to actually clear the new bar was Glas, a privately held Los Angeles manufacturer. On May 5 — five days after Reynolds' donation — the FDA authorized four Glas pods: Classic Menthol, Fresh Menthol, and mango and blueberry flavors sold as "Gold" and "Sapphire." It was the agency's first-ever authorization of non-tobacco, non-menthol e-cigarettes (6). The flavored approvals were the ones Trump had reportedly been pressing Makary to grant (7).

The policy fits a pattern. On his second full day in office, Trump withdrew a proposed federal ban on menthol cigarettes — an initiative the Biden administration had already largely shelved — and his team set aside a Biden-era proposal to sharply restrict nicotine levels in cigarettes (5).

Makary was already pushing back

Reporting after Makary's resignation suggests the FDA commissioner wasn't just blindsided by the FDA's May actions — he had been actively resisting flavored vape authorization for months.

According to internal memos later released by the agency, one of Makary's deputies blocked an FDA decision in February that would have authorized the first fruit-flavored vapes. FDA reviewers had determined the products were unlikely to be used by children because of Glas' age-gating technology: users must verify their identity with a government ID, pair the device with a smartphone via Bluetooth, and pass random biometric check-ins. The device won't operate if separated from the phone (6). The Glas products were finally OK'd on May 5, during Makary's last week heading the FDA (8).

In comments to STAT before his resignation, Makary acknowledged that career staff at the agency believed age-gating technology was solid. "That was their view. I was skeptical initially, but that's their view," he said (7).

Read More: Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

'Corruption,' say critics

"Donald Trump has enriched himself, family and friends off the power of the White House to the tune of billions this term, often at the expense of the public," said Kayla Hancock, director of Protect Our Care's Public Health Project. "For a $5 million check to a Trump Super PAC, the twice impeached President was very amenable to corruption even when it involved poisoning American kids with addictive flavored vapes" (9).

Rep. Seth Magaziner of Rhode Island posted that "in the Trump administration, money beats MAHA every time" — a reference to Kennedy's "Make America Healthy Again" branding (10).

Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, has been pressing the FDA on flavored vape approvals for weeks. He's been joined by Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Ed Markey of Massachusetts and six other Democrats on letters demanding the agency reverse course (11).

Advertisement

One Republican has broken with the administration on the underlying policy: Sen. Susan Collins of Maine co-signed a May 5 letter with Durbin warning the FDA that "kids are drawn to what flavors are most available to them" and urging the agency to reconsider (12).

The administration's defense

White House spokesman Kush Desai pushed back on any link between the donation and the policy.

"The only guiding factor behind the Trump administration's health policymaking is gold standard science," Desai said, adding that the FDA's regulatory approach to vapes and nicotine pouches "is rooted in recent evidence that has found they can help adults quit smoking" (1).

MAGA Inc. spokesman Alex Pfeiffer said the PAC "is pleased to accept legal contributions from those who agree with President Trump's America First agenda and his goal to make America great again" (1).

Some public health researchers do make a case for regulated flavored vapes. They argue that legal, age-gated products with adult-oriented branding can pull adult smokers off combustible cigarettes — a far deadlier product. But teens mostly get vapes from social sources rather than retail purchase, and illegal Chinese disposables have proliferated despite existing ID rules. The Bluetooth-and-biometric system that won Glas its authorization is also specific to Glas — future flavored vape applicants will be evaluated on their own age-gating, which may or may not meet the same bar.

Where this leaves teen vapers

More than 1.4 million U.S. middle and high school students still use e-cigarettes, according to the 2025 National Youth Tobacco Survey cited by Sen. Reed and his colleagues (11). The vast majority of teen vapers prefer fruit and candy flavors over tobacco or menthol.

The FDA's new guidance includes guardrails — no cartoon characters, no toy-like designs, age-gating requirements. Whether those rules are enough to keep newly-legal flavored vapes out of teenagers' hands is the question parents now have to weigh against a $6 billion market that, until two weeks ago, was supposed to be off-limits to most of these flavors entirely.

Article sources

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our editorial ethics and guidelines.

The New York Times (1); Reuters (2); U.S. Food and Drug Administration (3, 6); British American Tobacco (4); Rolling Stone (5); STAT (7); Associated Press (8); Protect Our Care (9); @Rep_Magaziner (10); Senator Reed (11); Senator Collins (12)

You May Also Like

Share this:

Rudro is an Editor with Moneywise. His work has appeared on Yahoo Finance, MSN, MSN Money, Apple News, Samsung News and the San Diego Union Tribune.

more from Rudro Chakrabarti

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.