SPY -4.11%
BND +0.15%
QQQ -4.98%
DIA -3.92%
VNQ -2.35%
GLD +0.01%
BTC -5.34%
AAPL -1.92%
GOOGL -1.19%
NVDA -5.71%
MSFT -4.41%
META -2.91%
AMZN -2.32%
TSLA -6.72%
UBER -1.81%
GS -6.39%
BAC -4.08%
JPM -4.71%
BRK.A -1.53%
COST +0.35%
XOM -1.79%
BABA +3.86%
WMT -3.08%
SPCX -0.21%
DIS -2.02%
F -1.58%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
A robot that can help humans with their health Joan Cros/Getty Images

Seniors are eager to pay extra for robot caregivers — at least in Japan. Americans may not be so keen, researchers fear

Advertisement

Japan is “at the forefront” of this, according to an analysis by the Center for Retirement Research (CRR) at Boston College. Back in 2015, the Japanese government began subsidizing the purchase of caregiving robots in nursing homes. By 2022, 70% of the country’s nursing homes were using at least one caregiving robot.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

A more recent study found that 65% of Japanese respondents would prefer a nursing home that uses robots — though they were more keen on mobility-aid robots versus communication robots. And they were willing to pay 8% more for the privilege.

However, these results “cannot be directly applied” to the U.S. According to CRR, “Japan’s culture of not wanting to be a burden on others (“meiwaku”) may make older Japanese individuals particularly receptive to robot care.”

It’s still unclear whether a majority of Americans would welcome caregiving robots — a 2017 study by Pew Research Center found that just 4 in 10 Americans would be interested in having a robot caregiver.

But times are changing, and with an aging population, a caregiver shortage and fewer foreign care workers, robot caregivers could become more pervasive.

The cost of caregiving

The U.S. will see about 760,500 openings for home health and personal care aides every year through 2035, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Robots could help to fill that gap. And, while they don’t replace skilled nurses, they may be able to handle more routine tasks, such as providing medication reminders or monitoring for falls.

Not only could robots provide a solution in nursing homes and long-term care facilities that are facing staff shortages, they may be able to provide help for family caregivers.

About a quarter of Americans are part of the ‘sandwich generation,’ tasked with caring for young children and aging parents at the same time. Elderly Americans may also find themselves taking on the role of caregiver, caring for an ailing spouse or sibling.

Advertisement

That help comes at a cost: AARP’s 2026 Caregiving Out-of-Pocket Costs Study found that adult caregivers are spending, on average, $11,508 a year on caregiving — equivalent to 31% of their annual household income. Those costs are much higher for “high-intensity” caregiving, such as supporting a family member with dementia.

Getting outside help is also costly. The median cost of an in-home health aide worker is $35 an hour (as of 2025), according to CareScout. That’s still less than the monthly cost for an assisted living community at $6,200, or a private room in a nursing home at $10,798.

This can put an enormous strain on a caregiver’s finances. Some may have to take time off work for caregiving duties, which impacts their income. Or, they might have to take on a second job, dip into their savings or borrow money to cover those extra costs.

Must Read

Could robots help?

There are different types of caregiving robots, designed for different purposes. Mobility-aid robots, for example, can be used in LTC facilities to lift residents from a bed to a toilet or wheelchair, rather than requiring staff to perform this task manually.

At home, monitoring robots could be used to track health metrics, movement and behavior, while communication robots could provide companionship, as well as friendly reminders (such as when to eat or when to take medications). This can take some stress off caregivers, but it’s not a replacement for human care.

“Communication robots may deprive residents of opportunities for genuine human connection,” according to the CRR analysis. When it comes to monitoring robots, “needs that the sensors fail to detect may go unaddressed.”

Advertisement

Robots also come with a financial cost. For home use, there are already a few options on the market. For example, ElliQ is a tabletop robot designed for isolated seniors living at home. There’s a one-time setup fee of $249, followed by a monthly charge of $49.99 to $59.99 to lease the service.

While more sophisticated, humanoid robots are intended for clinical use, there are advances in this area, too. For example, the NEO robot is a humanoid robot specifically designed for home use, coming in at around $20,000 (for ownership) or $499 per month (for a subscription) — though it hasn’t yet been clinically validated.

Medicare and most private insurers typically don’t cover caregiving robots, so these costs will come largely out of pocket — though in some cases, it could be cheaper than other forms of care. Aside from cost, there are also privacy concerns, since robots rely on sensors, cameras and cloud connectivity.

Still, the market for elder care assistive robots is projected to reach $9.8 billion by 2033, according to Grand View Research. And so far, North America has the largest share of the global market.

So, if someone lives alone, is in the early stages of cognitive decline or relies on caregiving from family members who don’t live nearby, a robot just might be able to lend a helping hand.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Vawn Himmelsbach Contributor

Vawn Himmelsbach is a veteran journalist who covers tech, business, finance and travel. Her work has been featured in publications such as The Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, National Post, CBC News, Yahoo Finance, MSN, CAA Magazine, Travelweek, Explore Magazine and Consumer Reports.

more from Vawn Himmelsbach

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.