• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
A Flock Safety camera is shown mounted to a light pole. The technology has drawn criticism from privacy advocates. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Google's AI gets tricked by memes, proclaims Flock surveillance cameras secretly contain $650 in gold

As recently as Aug. 5, Google’s AI was telling anyone who asked it that a Flock license plate camera reader holds up to 23 pounds of copper, plus several grams of gold — roughly $650.

The claim traces back to a joke that’s been circulating for months. Flock’s cameras, which photograph license plates and feed them into databases used by police, have a lot of enemies online.

Advertisement

Among privacy activists, a running gag took hold: there’s supposedly a small fortune in metal inside each unit, so why not turn one into scrapyard money? It was a bit, not a tip. Google’s AI didn’t get the joke and started repeating it as fact. Adding to the mishap is the fact the Flock camera actually weighs about three pounds.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

What the AI Overview said

Futurism’s Joe Wilkins reported that if you searched “how much gold does a Flock camera have,” Google gave you a straight answer. Each camera holds “about 1 to 5 grams of gold” in its circuit boards and wiring, the Overview claimed, along with as much as 23 pounds of copper. At that week’s gold prices, 5 grams came to roughly $650 per camera.

And where did Google find all this? Two places. One was a Substack post from an anonymous account called “do.not.obey.do.not.comply,” which put the scrap value at $150 to $500. Even that post didn’t pretend to know — it said the figure came from “estimates based on scrap-value discussions,” which is a long way of saying somebody guessed. The other source was an AI-generated Instagram post telling followers to tear into the hardware. The account behind it mostly posts about growing cannabis.

That was the entire evidence base behind an answer sitting in Google’s most prominent slot, above every actual webpage.

Google didn’t respond when Futurism reached out for comment. But by Aug. 6, when TechSpot’s Skye Jacobs checked, the answer had flipped: the Overview now tells you the copper claim can’t be true because the whole unit weighs about 3 pounds, that any gold is trace-level, and that the rumors “come from internet memes and AI hallucinations, not facts.”

Which means a meme boosted by an AI-generated post, then repeated by Google’s AI, is now being knocked down by the same AI that spread it.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Why the scrap math never worked, anyway

Gold was trading around $4,350 an ounce on Aug. 7, about $140 a gram, so it’s easy to see why the meme sounded like a real cash grab opportunity. At that price, 5 grams would mean around $700 worth is just hanging on a pole. For anyone drawn to the metal itself, there are far easier ways to invest in gold than climbing one.

Advertisement

But that gold isn’t in there — at least not in any way you could get at. There’s gold in a Flock camera the same way there’s gold in your phone: tiny traces spread across circuit boards and connectors, recoverable only if you know exactly what you’re doing. Futurism figured that without circuit-board scrapping experience, you’d be “hard pressed to earn enough to buy a Big Mac.”

The copper number that Google’s AI spat out was even worse. You can’t fit 23 pounds of anything inside a 3-pound device, and nothing in the answer suggested the AI ever ran that check. So the realistic outcome of someone following Google’s advice was a vandalism charge and a handful of parts worth a few dollars at best.

Why it matters for the rest of us

This AI overview got flagged because the error was funny and the subject was controversial. But the process that produced it was ordinary: somebody asked a question, the AI went hunting for text that resembled an answer, and the best matches happened to be a meme and the posts repeating it.

That same system answers financial questions all day. Someone earning $70,000 who searches for the rules on early 401(k) withdrawals, or whether they owe capital gains on a home sale, is reading output from the same process.

Every AI Overview lists its sources as small links under the text — click them to read the original sources before you trust a number. If the trail ends at the IRS’ website, a company filing or a named expert, you’re probably fine. If it ends at an anonymous Substack, treat the number like a stranger’s hot tip, because that’s what it is.

Moneywise contacted Google and Flock Safety for comment, but did not hear back in time for publication.

You May Also Like

Share this:

Godwin Oluponmile is a content specialist, SEO strategist and copywriter with seven years of expertise in finance, Web 3.0, B2B SaaS and technology. His work has been featured in publications such as Entrepreneur, HackerNoon, Blocktelegraph and Benzinga.

more from Godwin Oluponmile

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.