A Colorado woman is suing Flock Safety, a local cop, the Columbine Valley Police Department and others for falsely accusing her of stealing a $25 package from a home and invading her privacy, according to 9News.
Chrisanna Elser’s lawyers filed the suit seeking unspecified damages in early October, about one year after she was served a criminal summons by Sgt. Jaime Milliman on Sept. 27, 2025. According to body camera footage, Millman said Elser’s license plate camera data showed she was involved in the theft.
The Columbine Valley Police Department, like other law enforcement, uses Flock’s cameras to monitor public spaces and track vehicles.
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
“We have cameras everywhere in that town, you can’t get a breath of fresh air without us knowing,” Milliman said in the body camera footage, per 9News.
But as it turns out, Elser was wrongly accused and was able to prove her innocence by sharing her cell phone data and footage from her Rivian truck in question.
“We really just need to rein this in, I mean, it’s just utterly disturbing and very creepy on what this is happening in our society,” Elser told the news outlet.
The Columbine Valley Police Department did not immediately respond to Moneywise’s request for comment.
‘Orwellian’ surveillance
Elser told 9News she tried to clear her name on the spot by offering to show MIlliman video from her truck, which proved she was visiting a nearby tailor to be fitted for a gown. According to the lawsuit, Milliman would not let her show him the footage.
She said she spent weeks worried that the citation would impact her employment. Elser was nearly put on administrative leave by her job, according to ABC News. On Oct. 15, 2025, the summons was dropped, but police did not answer requests by Elser to see the video evidence they said they had.
Today, Elser is more aware of Flock cameras and the information they collect on private citizens. A Flock camera in Bow Mar, where she lives, is pointed directly at her driveway.
“I had no idea the Flock cameras existed and no idea a private company was keeping a record of every time I drove past my own neighborhood, or that any officer could pull it up without asking anyone or giving a reason for doing so,” Elser said in a statement. “If it can happen to me, it can happen to you.”
Elser’s attorney, Andy McNulty, said he intends for the case to become a class action suit against Flock.
“It’s about Orwellian surveillance technology,” McNulty told 9News. “It’s a class of people who have had their privacy invaded by this technology.”
McNulty responded to Moneywise’s request for comment and referred us to the press release put out alongside the lawsuit.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Flock cameras continue to raise privacy concerns
For its part, Flock says it’s done nothing wrong in this case. The company told multiple publications, including Moneywise, that its systems did what they are supposed to do in identifying the location of Elser’s vehicle.
“Law enforcement retained responsibility for interpreting and weighing that information as part of the broader investigation,” a Flock spokesperson said. Flock also said it “intends to vigorously defend itself in this litigation.”
Despite proving they can help police solve cases, Flock cameras have been the subject of backlash over invasion of privacy claims and misuse of the data collected on highways and residential streets. Several police officers have been arrested or relieved of their duties for abusing Flock’s system to track and stalk people without permission.
Some Americans have covered up and even vandalized Flock cameras in neighborhoods across the country over privacy concerns.
Flock has a self-reported network of about 120,000 AI-powered cameras across 49 states, though a cybersecurity researcher recently mapped out 50,000 more than that online. Flock also provides more 4,800 law enforcement agencies and nearly 1,000 businesses with cameras and software, The Guardian reported in March.
But given the immense backlash from the public, at least 100 cities cancelled contracts with the company, according to advocacy group DeFlock, NPR reported this summer. Many police departments, including the Los Angeles PD, have allowed their contracts to expire, TechCrunch reported. Meanwhile, Flock reportedly offered buyout packages to employees amid the backlash.
Elser’s lawsuit is not the only legal complaint Flock is facing. This includes class action lawsuits filed in Georgia and California. One Florida man is even singlehandedly taking on Flock, the city of Port St. Lucie and its mayor without a lawyer, arguing that the cameras violate Americans’ constitutional rights.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Danni Santana is a journalist based out of New York City with a decade of experience reporting and editing business stories about retail, restaurants, sports, and personal finance.
