North Dakota could soon make history by becoming the first U.S. state to eliminate property taxes — a bold move that supporters argue will ease the financial burden on homeowners and open doors for first-time buyers.
However, critics warn this sweeping change could leave local communities struggling to fund essential services, forcing them to depend on an uncertain state solution.
Growing frustration with rising property taxes has fueled support for the measure, with advocates claiming it will provide long-needed relief and help make real estate more affordable.
The ballot question is straightforward, yet it carries serious implications: should North Dakota scrap property taxes altogether, fundamentally altering how local governments are funded?
By shifting this responsibility to the state, the measure would dismantle a primary revenue stream for counties and municipalities, raising concerns about how — and if — these services would continue unaffected.
Measure faces a long road
With the election right around the corner, voters in the traditionally conservative state are trending towards a no vote. North Dakota voters rejected a similar proposal in 2012, and the 2024 edition is facing similar voter headwinds.
A North Dakota Monitor poll from late September indicated that 40% of voters plan to vote against it, with 28% in favor — while a significant one-third remain undecided.
Opponents, including Republican Governor Doug Burgum, argue that property taxes are crucial for funding schools, emergency services, infrastructure, and other public services.
Removing this dependable revenue stream would destabilize budgets across counties and cities, potentially putting essential services at risk.
“It's complete misinformation to say that if you vote for that thing, that somehow that you're ending property taxes, you're stopping property taxes; you won't,” Burgum said at a recent gathering in the North Dakota town of Watford City.
“What you will do, is, you will cause someone else to pick up the tab, that's what this whole thing is about. It's about who's going to pay for it, it doesn't lower the cost of delivering anything in our state, it just shifts the burden to somebody else."
Must Read
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Robert Kiyosaki begs investors not to miss this ‘explosion’ — says this 1 asset will surge 400% in a year
- Vanguard reveals what could be coming for U.S. stocks, and it’s raising alarm bells for retirees. Here’s why and how to protect yourself
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
How property taxes sustain communities
Property taxes are the backbone of local government funding in the U.S., underwriting everything from schools and police departments to road maintenance and fire protection.
In sparsely populated North Dakota, property tax revenue is particularly crucial, especially where alternative funding sources are scarce.
In 2023 alone, U.S. cities collected more than $363 billion in property taxes from single-family homes, marking a nearly 7% increase.
North Dakota residents pay a slightly above-average property tax rate, but significantly less than those in high-tax states like Illinois or New Jersey.
Supporters of the measure propose that the state step in to replace the lost local revenue, though details remain scarce on how these “replacement payments” would be funded or allocated.
Ideas include raising state taxes, adding new fees, or leaning more heavily on revenue from the oil and gas industry, which already plays a major role in North Dakota’s economy.
“We are such a rich state per capita that we can actually make this conversion and be able to afford it without increasing taxes and without cutting services,” Rick Becker, a former Republican state representative who's leading the measure, told The Associated Press.
North Dakota’s decision could set a precedent for other states where property tax rates have steadily increased, sparking a broader “tax revolt” movement.
With property tax burdens climbing across the nation, other states may consider similar measures if North Dakota’s gamble pays off.
If the plan backfires and leaves communities financially strained, it could serve as a cautionary tale instead.
You May Also Like
- Turning 50 with $0 saved for retirement? Most people don’t realize they’re actually just entering their prime earning decade. Here are 6 ways to catch up fast
- This 20-year-old lotto winner refused $1M in cash and chose $1,000/week for life. Now she’s getting slammed for it. Which option would you pick?
- Warren Buffett used these 8 repeatable money rules to turn $9,800 into a $150B fortune. Start using them today to get rich (and stay rich)
- Here are 5 easy ways to own multiple properties like Bezos and Beyoncé. You can start with $10 (and no, you don’t have to manage a single thing)
Chris Clark is a Kansas City–based freelance contributor for Moneywise, where he writes about the real financial choices facing everyday Americans—from saving for retirement to navigating housing and debt.
