• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Investing Basics
President Donald Trump, seen here speaking to press in Miami, designated the U.S. electric grid as “essential to the national defense.” MANDEL NGAN/Getty Images

Trump just declared the US power grid a national defense issue — some companies could quietly rake in billions. Here’s how to invest alongside them

America's aging power grid has just been elevated to one of the highest priorities in Washington — not just as an infrastructure challenge, but as a matter of national security.

In an April 20 presidential determination under the Defense Production Act, President Donald Trump formally designated the U.S. electric grid and its supply chain as "essential to the national defense" (1). A phrase that sounds like political framing actually carries real weight: it gives the federal government broad authority to direct funding, accelerate production and support domestic manufacturing in critical sectors.

Advertisement

For investors, that shift could signal a significant opportunity.

The grid's vulnerabilities are drawing urgent attention

The U.S. power grid has been under strain for years, as aging infrastructure struggles to keep pace with rising electricity demand from AI-focused data centers (2), electrification and extreme weather (3). At the same time, many of the components that keep the grid running, like transformers and high-voltage equipment, are sourced from overseas and leave the system exposed to supply chain disruptions.

Trump's order underscores a growing concern: during a major conflict, natural disaster or economic shock, the United States may not have the domestic capacity to quickly build, replace or repair critical grid infrastructure.

"Wait times for high-voltage transformers often exceed two years. That's not an anomaly – it's the rule," wrote Jim Welsh, CEO of infrastructure materials maker Peak Nano, in a recent editorial for Utility Dive (4). "This is a system-wide vulnerability that threatens to slow down the future we're racing to create."

By invoking the Defense Production Act, the federal government is effectively acknowledging that the private sector alone cannot scale production fast enough. Trump's measure allows Washington to prioritize contracts, provide financial incentives and invest directly in expanding domestic manufacturing capacity.

In practical terms, that means one thing: a sustained wave of federal spending aimed at strengthening the grid. The stakes are high. Before Trump's measure, the electric industry was already poised to spend more than $1 trillion to upgrade the grid over the next five years (5), according to the Edison Electric Institute, a trade group that represents investor-owned utilities.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Where the investment is likely to go

The determination outlines a wide range of components and materials that are now considered critical to national defense: transformers, transmission lines and conductors, substations, high-voltage circuit breakers, power electronics and even specialized raw materials like electrical core steel.

That breadth matters for investors because it spreads potential gains across multiple industries. Rather than benefiting a single niche, the policy could drive demand throughout the entire grid ecosystem, from heavy equipment manufacturers to materials suppliers.

Advertisement

Historically, when the federal government uses tools like the Defense Production Act to support infrastructure, it tends to create long-term demand for companies involved. Projects are often funded over multiple years, and contracts can provide a steady revenue base that is less sensitive to short-term economic swings.

Companies that could see a boost

Several categories of companies are particularly well positioned to benefit from increased investment in grid infrastructure.

Electrical equipment manufacturers could be among the most direct beneficiaries. Companies such as Eaton and Emerson already produce many of the equipment, controls, and software systems used in grid modernization, including power management, automation, and industrial control technologies.

Firms that specialize in building and maintaining transmission infrastructure may also see increased demand. Quanta Services, for example, plays a key role in constructing and upgrading power networks across the country.

Utilities themselves could benefit indirectly, too, particularly those that already invest heavily in grid modernization — the process of upgrading the electric grid with newer technology and infrastructure so it's more reliable and secure. Companies like NextEra Energy and Duke Energy may be able to accelerate infrastructure projects with additional policy support and funding.

Advertisement

Finally, suppliers of specialized materials and components, many of which operate behind the scenes, could experience rising demand as domestic production ramps up.

A long-term theme, not a quick trade

Investors should remember that grid modernization is a long-term play. Planning, permitting and operations for large-scale infrastructure projects can take years to complete.

But that slow pace can also be a strength. Government-backed investment tied to national security priorities is often more stable than many other kinds of spending, but it can still change with political shifts, budget constraints and policy reviews.

For long-term investors, this creates an opportunity to gain exposure to a durable trend rather than a short-lived market cycle.

For those who prefer a more diversified approach, exchange-traded funds focused on infrastructure, industrials or utilities can provide broad exposure to the companies involved in grid modernization.

Funds like GRID, ELFY and ZAP are among the most direct ETFs for grid modernization and electrification, while PAVE offers broader infrastructure exposure with a strong industrial tilt. For utility-focused exposure, FXU and UTES are useful options tied to rising power demand and the need to upgrade electricity networks.

Article Sources

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our ethics and guidelines.

The White House (1); Fox Business (2); Forbes (3); Utility Dive (4); Edison Electric Institute (5)

You May Also Like

Share this:
Chris Clark Contributor

Chris Clark is a Kansas City–based freelance contributor for Moneywise, where he writes about the real financial choices facing everyday Americans—from saving for retirement to navigating housing and debt.

more from Chris Clark

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.