• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

News
middle-aged women looking at senior woman in kitchen Pressmaster/Envato

Social Security trustees finally admit the baby rebound isn't coming — but say it's not so bad because Americans will die younger than expected

America’s retirement safety net just got a major reality check.

After years of betting that U.S. birth rates would eventually bounce back, Social Security’s trustees have confirmed what studies have been warning for years: Americans are having fewer children, and that trend isn’t likely to reverse anytime soon.

Advertisement

The result? A long-term funding hole for Social Security.

The 2026 Social Security Trustees Report projects a bigger financing shortfall than last year, driven in large part by lower expected birth rates, weaker immigration growth and a shrinking future workforce.

On the flip side, the report also includes an eyebrow-raising estimate that Americans won’t live as long as previously projected.

Letting go of the rebound

One of the biggest surprises in this year’s report is how dramatically trustees slashed their outlook on fertility. The report lowers the ultimate fertility assumption from 1.90 children per woman to 1.75, which is a notable change from years of forecasts that anticipated a post-recession rebound in births.

It’s a rebound that never ended up materializing.

For Social Security, this is important because the program largely operates on a pay-as-you-go basis, with today’s workers funding today’s retirees through payroll taxes. Fewer babies now means fewer workers paying into the system decades from today.

According to the trustees, the lower fertility assumption alone widened Social Security’s 75-year funding gap by 0.33% of taxable payroll. Tack on reduced immigration projections and the result is a sharp deterioration in the program’s long-term outlook.

Advertisement

Social Security’s projected 75-year funding shortfall jumped to 4.42% of taxable payroll, up from 3.82% in last year’s report. Meanwhile, the projected depletion date for the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund moved from 2033 to 2032.

If lawmakers fail to act before then, incoming payroll taxes would only be sufficient to cover about 78% of scheduled retirement benefits.

There was some data to partially offset the impact of weaker population growth (though the Center for Retirement Research calls it “unpersuasive”).

Trustees assume faster productivity gains in the future, potentially fueled by technological advances including artificial intelligence. Higher productivity typically translates into higher wages, which means more payroll tax revenue flowing into the system.

And there’s also the assumption of higher mortality rates than were previously projected. The trustees’ assumptions result in a life expectancy at birth of 81.8 years in 2056.

That means future retirees would, on average, collect benefits for fewer years, cutting down on Social Security’s long-term costs.

Advertisement

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Why this matters for your retirement

Social Security remains the main source of retirement income for many older Americans, and the latest report reinforces that time is running out to shore up the program’s finances.

According to the trustees, eliminating the 75-year funding gap immediately would mean either a 4.42-percentage-point increase in payroll taxes or an across-the-board benefit reduction of roughly 22%.

Despite all this, Social Security is not headed for bankruptcy.

Even if the trust fund reserves are exhausted, workers will continue paying payroll taxes into the system. The problem is that those revenues alone would not be enough to fully cover promised benefits, potentially resulting in automatic benefit reductions.

The trustees’ latest report effectively closes the door on the future baby boom assumption, and even with the projection of higher mortality rates, the question left is whether lawmakers will act and when.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Jessica Wong Freelance Writer

Freelance writer with an economic development and consulting background.

more from Jessica Wong

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.