• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

News
musk Benjamin Fanjoy/Envato

Elon Musk will pay just $1.5 million in settlement over his acquisition of Twitter and even the judge isn't happy about it

When Elon Musk agreed in May to pay a civil penalty of just $1.5 million over questions about his purchase of Twitter, it ruffled the feathers of many critics, who wrote off the penalty (which came without any admission of guilt) as pocket change for the world’s richest man.

Now the judge overseeing the case has weighed in and, based on her comments, she appears less than pleased with the outcome as well.

Advertisement

U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan approved the settlement between Musk and the Securities and Exchange Commission, but questioned if the SEC had done enough to hold Musk accountable.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

“A court presented with a consent judgment is not a rubber stamp. But neither ​is it an ombudsman,” Sooknanan wrote. “Whether the Executive Branch (through the SEC) has done enough to hold Mr. Musk ⁠to account for his alleged violation is, like many other issues, for our citizenry to decide at the ballot box.”

Hands tied?

While Sooknanan had reservations about the settlement, she said she was grudgingly forced to accept it.

“This Court is limited to evaluating whether the proposed consent judgment meets minimum standards of fairness and reasonableness, or whether it instead ‘make[s] a mockery of judicial power,’” she wrote. “Although the Court has significant misgivings about the settlement reached in this case, it cannot say that the settlement meets that high threshold. That means that this Court must accept the Parties’ consent judgment.”

The case was filed by the SEC in 2022, when Joe Biden was President. It centered around an 11-day delay by Musk in revealing his previous investments in Twitter before making the purchase. By not disclosing those, the SEC said, he was able to save as much as $150 million in the purchase, which impacted the amount received by other shareholders.

Musk has said the delay was unintentional. He paid $44 billion for Twitter in October 2022.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

A one-time deal?

Gary Gensler, who ran the SEC under Biden, left his post soon after the lawsuit against Musk was filed and as Donald Trump took office. Musk, of course, ran Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency and is a Trump ally, despite a falling out between the two after Musk left Washington.

That relationship with Trump was one of the key things critics of the deal focused on. And it didn’t escape the judge’s attention either.

“The court is left to wonder whether the SEC will afford other alleged securities-law violators such solicitude,” Sooknanan wrote. “Or is this a one-time deal designed for Mr. Musk negotiated without the involvement of the SEC lawyers litigating this case?”

The SEC has said the settlement did not result from collusion, and the $1.5 million penalty was the largest of its type.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Chris Morris Contributing Writer

Chris Morris is a veteran journalist with more than 35 years of experience at many of the internet's biggest news outlets. In addition to his activities as a writer, reporter and editor, Chris is also a frequent panel moderator and speaker at major conferences, including CES and South by Southwest.

more from Chris Morris

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.