• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Economy
Kevin O'Leary testifies before the House Committee on Small Business during a hearing at the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington, D.C., Jan. 18, 2024. Kent Nishimura / Getty Images

'Wake up and smell the hydrocarbons': Kevin O'Leary blasts California Gov. Gavin Newsom over energy policies. Chevron says state is playing a 'dangerous game'

“Shark Tank” investor and businessman Kevin O’Leary urges California governor Gavin Newsom to “wake up and smell the hydrocarbons” when it comes to the state’s battle against climate change.

California’s energy policies have come under fire lately, with Chevron’s U.S. refining division chief Andy Walz accusing the Golden State of playing a “dangerous game” that risks gasoline price spikes and shortages. The premium California drivers pay for gas over the national average may rise significantly if lawmakers continue to enact policies that push for low-carbon fuel standards, he told Bloomberg.

Advertisement

On Feb. 2, Chevron reported an overall profit of $21.3-billion in 2023, a 40% decline from the previous year, despite increased oil and gas production.

O’Leary’s been on California’s case for a while now. In an interview with Fox Business on Jan. 3, he slammed the state’s “uncompetitive” energy policies and called California’s management “the worst of every state in the union.”

Despite claiming to “like” Newsom after meeting him in person, O’Leary described the democratic governor as “clueless to the competition” in the energy market between states — adding, “I wouldn’t let him manage a candy store.”

He called California “a very bad place to do business” for energy companies and their investors. Is O’Leary right?

California vs. Big Oil

In late 2022, Newsom announced an ambitious climate action plan that would slash greenhouse gas emissions by 85% and drop gas consumption 94% by 2045.

After reporting Big Oil made $200 billion in profits in 2022, Newsom accused these companies of “fleecing Californians at the pump” and promised to hold them accountable. State lawmakers are considering capping refining profits.

Speaking at the opening ceremony of New York City's Climate Week in September, Newsom accused oil supermajors of “lying” about climate change. He said: “The climate crisis is, after all, a fossil fuel crisis. They continue to play us for fools. I’ve had enough and I’m sick and tired of this.”

In the same week, California filed a civil lawsuit against five energy giants — Exxon Mobil, Shell, BP, ConocoPhillips and California-based Chevron — accusing them of misleading the public and downplaying how fossil fuels are contributing to climate change.

Advertisement

Chevron CEO Mike Wirth rejected that claim, telling Bloomberg: “Climate change is a global issue. It calls for a coordinated global policy response, not piecemeal litigation that benefits attorneys and politicians.”

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Investment capital in California

The Golden State’s not-so-golden treatment of Big Oil has had a huge impact on its willingness to invest in the nation’s most populous state.

According to Bloomberg, in December, Walz wrote in a filing: “California’s policies have made it a difficult place to invest so we have rejected capital projects in the state.”

He added: “Such capital flight reflects the state’s inadequate returns and adversarial business climate.”

As an investor in the energy industry, O’Leary has rejected California because of its “bad policy [and] weak management” that he claims is “hurting the California economy and people.”

Instead, he would rather pump money into states like North Dakota, Virginia, Oklahoma and Texas because “they’re competing for my money” and have regulatory environments that boost — rather than hinder — energy security.

“Who would give a dime to California to invest in energy when the regulatory environment is so punitive you can't make money?” he said. “That’s what Chevron’s telling everybody.”

You May Also Like

Share this:

Bethan Moorcraft is a reporter for Moneywise with experience in news editing and business reporting across international markets.

more from Bethan Moorcraft

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.