• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

A ‘systemic’ problem for CRE

A lot of the outstanding CRE debt is held by private mortgage lenders, who are really feeling the strain of America’s long-term high interest rates. Sri-Kumar thinks these non-bank lenders are at the heart of the CRE problem.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told the Senate Banking Committee on Feb. 6 that the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) is “very focused” on monitoring the risks stemming from non-bank mortgage lenders and their potential for failure, per a Bloomberg report.

“They’re reliant on short-term financing that may be a lot less stable than deposits, and in stressful times, their credit lines can be pulled,” Yellen said in response to questions from Democratic Senator Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada. “There is concern that in stressful market conditions we could see the failure of one of these.”

But Sri-Kumar did not agree with all of the Treasury Secretary’s comments.

“Janet Yellen made a point of saying she did not think it [the CRE problem] was systemic,” he said. “I have been saying for the past year that I think it is systemic, it has been building up and I think it is reaching a crescendo right now.”

It’s not just the U.S. facing unsettling developments in commercial property loans. Sri-Kumar said similar CRE pain is being felt by financial institutions in China — where he said the property market is “in deep dive” — in Japan and Europe, where major lenders are struggling to fund their CRE operations.

“That’s why I think it is systemic,” Sri-Kumar reiterated. “I don’t know why the Treasury Secretary can say [otherwise].”

Don't miss

What does this mean for the U.S. economy?

If Sri-Kumar’s CRE tsunami forecast comes true, there’s a chance it could have a spillover effect across the entire U.S. economy.

From there, it depends how the Fed handles it, he told CNBC.

Sri-Kumar thinks the U.S. needs to switch over from quantitative tightening (suppressing money supply to curb inflation) to quantitative easing (increasing money supply and cutting long-term interest rates) “earlier rather than later.”

“Don’t act like you did in September 2008, allowing Lehman Brothers to go bankrupt,” he warned. “Perhaps they learned their lesson, they will cut the rates faster [and] they will switch over to providing liquidity faster.”

If the Fed acts fast and starts cutting interest rates as soon as the April/May FOMC meeting, Sri-Kumar thinks they can “limit the fallout on the rest of the economy.”

He expects to see rate cuts totaling 50 basis points by the end of the year. This would help to stem the CRE debt tsunami — but “there is a cost” to such quantitative easing, he admitted.

“You’re going to give up your fight against inflation,” Sri-Kumar said, with a bold prediction that the inflation rate will end the year “higher than where it is today.”

What to read next

About the Author

Bethan Moorcraft

Bethan Moorcraft

Reporter

Bethan Moorcraft is a reporter for Moneywise with experience in news editing and business reporting across international markets.

What to Read Next

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter.