Kim Kardashian has turned spectacular wealth into an online spectacle. Whether it works in her favor is in the eyes of her 344 million Instagram followers, but it’s definitely a case study in status symbols.
Back in 2023, Kardashian gained notoriety in the U.S. Sun after posting photos of a $2,500 Louis Vuitton bag and $2,950 Prada bag that the fashion houses gave to her as gifts on Instagram, with critics grumbling that flaunting such overt status symbols was in bad taste.
Today, she seems to have adopted a more subtle approach. Kardashian now combines luxury fashion with social justice messaging, like her selfie with a Louis Vuitton bag promoting a UNICEF fundraising initiative.
Thanks for subscribing!
Money advice that fits your real life.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
In May, she appeared in a striking yellow gown to promote her Broadway production Fear of 13, which is based on the true story of Nick Yarris, who was wrongfully convicted of rape and murder.
Of course, Kardashian fans were more interested in her eye-catching dress. On Instagram, Cosmopolitan India pointed out that Kardashian was wearing a vintage Dior gown by John Galliano while carrying a small Birkin bag. InStyle reported that the tiny Birkin bag alone was worth $100,000.
So, is Kardashian’s more subtle approach to luxury status symbols working in her favor?
How the 1% win fans while dripping wealth online
Moneywise reached out to Jesse D’Agostino at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management to find out how “stealth” status signaling works.
D’Agostino studies persuasion and status signaling on social media. She says it’s a perfect real-life lab because it involves intentional signaling. People purposefully choose to post specific images and status updates online, which means they’re likely sending a specific message.
More often than not, billionaires like Kardashian stage status symbols in posts. That’s when wealth signaling can backfire, like the backlash she faced when she featured the Louis Vuitton and Prada bags she received as gifts in 2023.
“When you’ve got the name Gucci on your chest, it’s obvious you want people to know ‘I’m wearing a Gucci T-shirt,’” D’Agostino said. “It’s very overt and people don’t like overt behavior.”
But there’s an equally big problem with stealth signaling: Sometimes a status symbol is so subtle that an audience doesn’t pick up on it, which defeats the whole point of signaling. For example, the same Gucci T-shirt — minus the branding on the front — may look like just a regular T-shirt.
D’Agostino teamed up with social psychologist Derek Rucker, a marketing professor at Kellogg, to investigate what works when it comes to subtle status signals. Their hypothesis: If a post includes a subtle status symbol like an elegant suit and a third party points it out (like, ‘Bro ate that Tom Ford suit!’) the original poster enjoys greater status. The bystander has drawn attention to the luxury item for them. That way, the original poster avoids a more unpleasant label: that of a show-off.
An example of the social media tests that D’Agostino conducted with Rucker.
To test the theory, D’Agostino sourced real-life Instagram posts featuring quiet luxury. She kept the photos but altered captions, in some cases creating imaginary third-party comments. Then she recruited people online to look at the fake posts and answer survey questions about the person featured in each one — like whether they’d hire them for a job.
Sure enough, participants looked less kindly on posts with phrases like “Feeling good in my Armani suit” than those with a third-party comment like, “Nice Armani suit.”
In the latter case, study participants saw the person in the post as having status and warmth at the same time. They said they’d be likelier to hire such a person, as opposed to the person whose signal was too “loud.”
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Bystanders and fans have power over the 1%
Kim Kardashian has parlayed her celebrity status into a brand and business worth $1.9 billion, according to Forbes. But she needs to maintain and build that brand, and that requires an audience.
As D’Agostino’s research suggests, Kardashian needs her followers to point out that she’s wearing vintage Dior so she doesn’t have to. She needs fans that not only appreciate her devotion to children’s causes, criminal justice and Louis Vuitton bags, but those who’ll spread the word that her brand goes well beyond fashion.
In other words, status signaling requires an audience to pick up on the signal. Without that recognition, influencers like Kardashian could see their brand deals dry up. And that’s a problem research shows even billionaires can’t solve with cash.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Laura Boast is a Senior Reporter with Moneywise.com and a lifelong content creator who has reached international audiences at Discovery, CBC, Blue Ant Media, Bond Brand Loyalty and more.
