• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Retirement
Selfie of retired adults of various ages, smiling on a beach. Envato/oneinchpunchphotos

Here’s what happens in America when you retire at 50 vs 55 vs 60 vs 67. The timing radically impacts how much income you can produce

Most retirement planning revolves around hitting a so-called “magic number.” If you believe you need $1 million to retire, you’re focused on maximizing contributions, minimizing taxes and working as hard as possible until you get to that number.

But if you reach your goal early — say, by age 50 — should you retire immediately? Experienced financial planners will likely point out that the size of your portfolio and retirement savings is only part of the equation. Timing matters too, and retiring early can have consequences you might not have considered.

Advertisement

Consider a simple baseline: Christie, a 50-year-old with $1 million invested, earning 7% annually, who can still save $12,000 a year if she keeps working. What changes is not just how long the money lasts, but how much income it can safely generate.

Here’s a closer look at how her journey evolves at different ages.

50 (very early retirement)

With a million-dollar portfolio, Christie could potentially retire. However, this is the most fragile option.

According to the Social Security Administration’s actuarial tables, Christie could have 29 more years of life expectancy at this age. (1) That means her seven-figure portfolio needs to last three decades through market volatility and inflation.

Early retirement also carries tax consequences. Christie faces a 10% IRS penalty, in addition to ordinary income tax, on any withdrawals from retirement accounts before the age of 59.5. (2)

The only workaround is the Rule of 72(t) (3), which allows Christie to take Substantially Equal Periodic Payments (SEPP) payments. This enables penalty-free withdrawals using one of three IRS-approved formulas: Required Minimum Distribution (RMD), Fixed Amortization or Fixed Annuitization.

This trade-off is rigidity and limited withdrawals. Once Christie chooses a SRPP formula, she must follow the withdrawal schedule exactly until age 59.5. Any deviation, even minor, could trigger retroactive penalties on all prior withdrawals.

Advertisement

For added flexibility and income, Christie may need to consider part-time work or side gigs.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

55 (early retirement)

Retiring in your mid-50s is still relatively early, but it comes with one clear advantage: the Rule of 55.

This rule allows penalty-free withdrawals from an employer's 401(k) or 403(b) plan if you leave your job in or after the year you turn 55, avoiding the usual 10% early-withdrawal penalty — though ordinary income taxes still apply. (4)

This rule does not apply to IRAs and applies only to retirement plans of the employer you leave.

Simply put, by delaying her retirement just five years, Christie unlocks the ability to access her retirement funds without relying on SEPPs. She also adds five more years of contributions and compound growth to her portfolio.

Starting with $1 million at age 50, Christie’s $1,000 monthly contributions and 7% annual growth result in a portfolio worth about $1.47 million by age 55.

60 (conventional retirement)

Most Americans retire in their early 60s. In 2024, the average retirement was 64.6 for men and 62.6 for women, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. (5)

Advertisement

This may be partly because the IRS eliminates the 10% early- withdrawal penalty at age 59.5, and most workers become eligible to claim Social Security starting at age 62. (6,7).

By retiring at age 60, Christie opens a useful window for tax planning. She can withdraw funds from retirement accounts without penalty, and because she’s not yet collecting Social Security, her taxable income may be low enough to make partial Roth conversions attractive.

Over time, this strategy can reduce pre-tax balances and lower the risk of large required minimum distributions (RMDs) beginning at age 73. (8)

Again, delaying retirement by another five years, and assuming continued $1,000 monthly contributions and 7% annual growth, allows Christie’s portfolio to expand from $1.47 million to roughly $2.1 million.

Read More: Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

67 (late retirement)

Age 67 is the full retirement age (FRA) for most people born in 1960 or later. In other words, Christie can receive 100% of her Social Security benefit if she claims at this age.

Advertisement

Waiting another seven years also allows her portfolio to expand to $3.5 million, assuming continued $1,000 monthly contribution and 7% annual returns.

The trade-off is a shorter retirement window, and potentially fewer healthy years to enjoy it. By age 67, Christie may have less time to fully enjoy her accumulated wealth.

Retiring at this age also leaves limited opportunity to convert large pre-tax balances into Roth accounts, increasing exposure to RMDs.

This may explain why only about 16% of U.S. retirees claim Social Security at full retirement age, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center. (9)

The bottom line is that timing is a crucial — but often overlooked — factor in retirement planning.

Article sources

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our editorial ethics and guidelines.](https://moneywise.com/editorial-ethics-and-guidelines).*)

Social Security Administration (SSA) (1; IRS (2); Fidelity (3); IRS (4); Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (5); IRS (6); Social Security Administration (SSA) (7); IRS (8); Bipartisan Policy Center (9).

You May Also Like

Share this:
Vishesh Raisinghani Freelance Writer

Vishesh Raisinghani is a financial journalist covering personal finance, investing and the global economy. He's also the founder of Sharpe Ascension Inc., a content marketing agency focused on investment firms. His work has appeared in Moneywise, Yahoo Finance!, Motley Fool, Seeking Alpha, Mergers & Acquisitions Magazine and Piggybank.

more from Vishesh Raisinghani

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.