In financial management circles, suggesting retirement savers de-emphasize maxing out 401(k) contributions may be considered heresy.
After all, maxing out a 401(k) puts real cash on the retirement planning table.
In 2026, long-term savers can steer up to $24,500 pre-tax to a 401(k) plan. Additionally, 50-year-olds and up can add $8,000 in pre-tax or Roth catch-up contributions to gain more financial traction for retirement.
Thanks for subscribing!
Retire on your terms — we'll show you how.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
Maxing out on a 401(k) plan can add significantly to a retirement account. According to data compiled by USA Today, a 40-year-old 401(k) plan participant who’s never contributed to a plan, and puts the maximum $24,500 into a 401(k) in 2026, leaves it untouched and gains an annual 10% return, can expect that amount to grow to about $265,000 by age 65.
But is it always the best retirement saving strategy? Here’s how some Americans are now choosing to save more strategically.
401(k) maxing has its limits
Yet data show that the percentage of U.S. workers who max out their 401(k) plan is declining. In 2025, 51% of workers earning $150,000 or more annually maxed out their 401(k), according to Vanguard. In 2018, that figure was 60% for the same cohort.
Why the downside shift in the retirement plan maxing realm? Money management experts say several factors are at play, but they all point to one issue: retirement savers want to earn more cash and pay less in taxes, and they think they can get the job done without maxing out a 401(k).
“When we first started on the 401(k) plan, it was, ‘Let’s get people going. Let’s get people accumulating,” Craig Copeland, director of wealth benefits research at the Employee Benefit Research Institute, told Bloomberg. “Now we have these successful people doing it. We need to be more sophisticated than just max it out.”
Part of the problem, if you can call it that, is that many Americans in their 40’s and 50’s have outperformed in their 401(k) savings so much, they’re looking elsewhere, especially for tax reasons.
“A traditional 401(k) saves you taxes now,” Gerry Keene, a financial advisor at LPL Financial, told Moneywise. “The money grows tax-deferred and is withdrawn at future tax rates. One way to think about this is that you get tax savings on the seeds and pay taxes on the harvest.”
But consider a 45-year-old retirement saver with a $200,000 salary and $500,000 in the 401(k) who plans to retire at 60.
“Retiring at 60 means this person’s 401(k) is accessible without penalty, so early access isn’t a problem,” George Varimezov, CPA and Founder at Varstan Bookkeeping Services, told Moneywise. “The real issue is tax diversification. With $500,000 already pre-tax, they’re likely heading toward large required withdrawals later.”
Currently, tax rates are historically low, and even the higher brackets are low by historical norms. But Keene notes it’s reasonable to assume tax rates will go up in the future — “making the differential between tax savings on the seeds and taxes on the harvest much higher.”
“Once you have reduced your bracket to whatever your goal is, it makes sense to reallocate future funds to a different type of investment as opposed to doubling down on the tax savings,” he added.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Take a graduated approach
For higher-earning investors who want to bypass maxing out their 401(k) and minimize retirement tax impact, money managers recommend spreading portfolio cash across several tax-advantaged investment vehicles through a stepladder approach.
First, you should always contribute enough to get your full employer match. “That’s an immediate return no other account can beat,” said Varimezov.
Varimezov recommends starting with a health savings account (HSA). An HSA is a solid tax-management vehicle, as it’s the only account that’s tax-deductible going in, grows tax-free, and comes out tax-free for medical costs. The 2026 limits are $4,400 for individual coverage and $8,750 for family, plus $1,000 at age 55.
“To use it as a retirement account, invest the balance instead of leaving it in cash, pay current medical bills out of pocket, and keep the receipts,” Varimezov advised. “You can reimburse yourself tax-free years later.”
However, there are several limitations with HSA accounts. You must be on a high-deductible health plan and on-medical withdrawals before 65 carry a 20% penalty plus income tax. But after 65, any non-medical withdrawals will be taxed like a traditional IRA.
From there, you’d move to maxing out a Roth IRA, which Varimezov notes beats out a traditional IRA in this scenario.
“A Roth wins when you expect your rate in retirement to be the same or higher,” Varimezov said. “That’s typical of early-career professionals, people with large pre-tax balances that will create big required withdrawals later, and anyone who wants to leave tax-free money to heirs.”
In 2026, direct Roth IRA contributions phase out between $153,000 and $168,000 and $242,000 to $252,000 for married people filing jointly. “Here, higher earners use the backdoor Roth,” Varimezov notes. “Just watch the pro-rata rule (an IRS regulation that prevents taxpayers from selectively converting only after-tax (non-deductible) money from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA). If you already have pre-tax IRA money, it can make part of the conversion taxable.”
Finally, a brokerage account offers high earners looking to retire at 60 or so with real advantages: no contribution limits, no early-withdrawal penalties, long-term gains taxed at 0%, 15%, or 20% instead of ordinary rates, and heirs receive a stepped-up cost basis.
For someone planning to retire before 59½, a brokerage account makes sense as a bridge to cover the years before retirement accounts are accessible. But Varimezov adds he’d recommend most others max out their tax-advantaged accounts before going this route.
Don’t make this mistake when deploying an alternate strategy
High earners get hurt by swinging to the other extreme and abandoning the 401(k) for a Roth IRA entirely. The most “sophisticated” strategy now is going to be one that will give you the most flexibility when you need it later on.
“If you’re in a top bracket today and expect a lower one in retirement, the traditional deduction is worth real money right now,” David Kassir, managing director of private wealth management at Manna Wealth Management, told Moneywise.
“For most high earners, the answer is not either or. It’s owning money in different tax buckets, so that in retirement you choose which dollar to spend, and what tax to pay, year by year.”
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Brian O'Connell is a US based former Wall Street bond trader and author of two best-selling books: "The 401k Millionaire" and "CNBC's Creating Wealth". His work is featured on national finance and business platforms like TheStreet.com, CBS News, CNN, The Wall Street Journal and Forbes
