Trump’s plan to impose 107% tariffs spooks Italian pasta makers. Will Americans soon see staple brands disappear from shelves?

Some importers are baffled by the focus on pasta. Sal Auriemma, whose family has run Claudio Specialty Foods in Philadelphia’s Italian Market for more than 60 years, told CBS News the sector feels like an unusual target (2).

"Pasta is a pretty small sector to pick on. I mean, there's a lot bigger things to pick on," Auriemma said. "It's a basic food."

Why lawmakers are considering a tariff on pasta

Pasta may be iconic in Italy, but it’s also big business in the U.S. The American pasta market is valued at more than $9 billion and continues to grow (3).

While U.S. companies export about $500 million worth of pasta each year, America is also one of Italy’s most important buyers — accounting for roughly 15% of Italy’s pasta exports, or about $684 million annually, according to data reported by CBS. Which means these proposed tariffs could have a massive impact on the economy and food prices.

So why is the administration targeting pasta?

The potential tariff would affect 13 brands: Agritalia, Aldino, Antiche Tradizioni Di Gragnano, Barilla, Gruppo Milo, La Molisana, Pastificio Artigiano Cav. Giuseppe Cocco, Pastificio Chiavenna, Pastificio Liguori, Pastificio Lucio Garofalo, Pastificio Sgambaro, Pastificio Tamma, Rummo. It stems from what the U.S. Department of Commerce says was a routine antidumping review (4). As CBS reports, the agency launched an investigation in 2024 after complaints from Missouri-based 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, which owns Ronzoni Pasta, and Illinois-based Winland Foods, maker of Prince and Mueller’s Pasta.

Both companies claim that Italian pasta makers were selling products in the U.S. below fair market value and undercutting domestic brands, a practice known as "dumping." Dumping occurs when a foreign producer sells goods in the U.S. below their "normal value," either the price charged at home or the cost of production plus a reasonable profit (5).

Commerce officials say the two largest Italian exporters, La Molisana and Garofalo, failed to provide accurate or complete information during the review, prompting the department to apply the proposed 92% duty estimate to them and 11 other companies.

Italian officials insist the claims are unfounded. EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic called the combined 107% levy "unacceptable," arguing there is no evidence Italy is dumping pasta in the U.S. (2). Several pasta makers also told CBS that prices for Italian brands in American stores are already higher than domestic pasta, contradicting any claim that they’re unfairly cheap.

How the potential pasta tariff could impact consumers and investors

If the tariff moves forward, with the decision set for Jan. 2, consumers should brace for more than just pricier pasta dinners.

Italian brands that remain in the U.S. could see retail prices jump anywhere from 50% to 100%, depending on how much of the 107% duty they choose to absorb. If producers pull out entirely, shortages could push demand toward domestic brands, driving up prices across the board.

Restaurants would also feel the pressure — Italian restaurants, caterers and meal-prep services rely heavily on imported pasta for quality and consistency. Higher wholesale costs will likely cause menu price increases at a time when food inflation is already straining budgets. Grocery chains and specialty importers will likely raise prices or have to redesign supply chains to keep shelves stocked.