SPY -1.41%
BND +0.80%
QQQ -3.61%
DIA -0.17%
VNQ +0.12%
GLD -0.28%
BTC -2.30%
AAPL +1.53%
GOOGL -2.55%
NVDA -4.15%
MSFT -1.77%
META -1.75%
AMZN -3.86%
TSLA -4.50%
UBER -3.75%
GS -1.38%
BAC -5.13%
JPM +1.26%
BRK.A +1.57%
COST +3.20%
XOM +3.95%
BABA -1.35%
WMT +5.57%
SPCX -9.92%
DIS +0.46%
F +0.75%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
couple KSAT/ksat.com

Her fiancé died months before the wedding. Now she's out $16,000 and the venue is suing her

Weddings are the start of a couple’s life together, and couples often spend big bucks to make their day special. Unfortunately, they often don’t think about what will happen if tragedy strikes before they reach the altar.

As one family is finding out the hard way, this situation could lead to tremendous financial loss and a legal battle the family definitely doesn’t need during a difficult time. That family is the Hernandez family and, as KSAT.com reported, Lucy Hernandez, the mother of a deceased groom, is speaking out about a conflict that has ended up in court with thousands on the line.

The death of a groom leads to a legal battle

According to KSAT.com, Lucy’s son Diego was planning to get married, so he and his future bride put down a $15,909.28 deposit on a wedding venue. Sadly, Diego passed away before the wedding could take place, and the venue has refused to return the deposit.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

“I’m very surprised,” Lucy Hernandez told KSAT.com. “I honestly felt that it wasn’t going to go past a phone call.” However, the initial call to the venue requesting a refund didn’t go as planned. The venue agreed only to transfer the booking to a future date or apply the balance toward a different event. Neither was useful, given Diego’s untimely death.

“Where are their morals? Where are their moral principles?” Hernandez asked KSAT.com. “We don’t have a fight in us. We don’t. We’re emotionally drained. This is just weighing heavily.” The family is fighting, though, and they filed a lawsuit that describes the venue’s decision to keep the money as an “unjust and ghoulish windfall built on a young man’s death.”

Advertisement

The venue owners disagree, though, and they’ve filed a countersuit claiming not only that they don’t have to return the funds, but also that the fiancée breached her contract by not paying the remaining balance.

The venue says she owes because the contract states that any funds paid will be forfeited if the booking is canceled. And it wants damages for the alleged breach.

Must Read

Lawyers say a death doesn’t mean a contract isn’t enforceable

The outcome of this dispute is unknown, and the conflict will likely be resolved either through a civil court decision or an out-of-court settlement.

However, several lawyers weighed in on the laws that would generally apply in these circumstances.

“A groom’s death does not automatically cancel the venue contract, but the venue is not automatically entitled to keep the entire deposit or collect the remaining balance either,” Casey Glasser, a California attorney and the founder of Foundwell Legal, told Moneywise. “The answer depends on the contract, applicable state law and whether the death provides a legal basis to excuse performance.”

Advertisement

Glasser explained that the couple could potentially argue “frustration of purpose,” since “the venue was booked for their wedding, and the groom’s death defeats that central purpose.” However, she said that “whether it succeeds depends in part on whether the contract allocated the risk of that event to the couple.”

Barry E. Janay, owner of The Law Office of Barry E. Janay, P.C., also stressed the importance of reviewing the contract, telling Moneywise, “You would have to look closely at the cancellation policy and any liquidated damages provision.”

As Janay explained, “The venue has a legitimate interest in making sure that the space can be occupied for the highest value, and therefore they wouldn’t likely allow a last-minute cancellation with a full refund under almost any circumstances, even including the death of a spouse.”

However, Janay says there’s a catch: The venue must try to mitigate its damages or minimize its losses. If it can rebook, for example, the venue may be able to collect money from the grieving fiancée only if the new booking brings in less money than the wedding would have. The venue can only recover for actual financial harm.

Unfortunately, if cutting its losses isn’t possible and the surviving bride signed the contract making her responsible for the full balance even after a cancellation, she likely has to pay up. The best way to prevent that would have been to address the issue in advance.

Advertisement

“This is why couples should ask the hard ‘what if’ questions before signing,” said Lorraine Galvis, an attorney & founder of Galvis and Co. “Rather than relying only on general force majeure language, I’d recommend addressing the death of either party explicitly in the cancellation or termination section. The agreement can state whether that event permits termination, what notice is required and whether a full or partial refund is available.”

Glasser agreed, telling Moneywise, “Before signing, couples can request language expressly addressing death, serious illness or injury affecting either person getting married or specified immediate family members.”

As Glasser said, “This can appear in a force majeure clause or a separate cancellation provision. It should specify when cancellation or postponement is permitted, whether payments are refunded, which documented, nonrecoverable expenses the venue may deduct and whether the remaining balance is waived.”

Such an agreement could have saved the grieving family in the KSAT.com story a lot of trouble. Unfortunately, it’s far too late now, as the family is forced to fight in court to try to get what they believe should be theirs.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Christy Bieber Contributing Writer

Christy Bieber is a US based personal finance and legal writer who has 15 years of experience. She has written for many publications including Forbes, Kilplinger, CNN, WSJ, Credit Karma, Insurify and more.

more from Christy Bieber

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.