• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Trump Mandel NGAN/AFP/Getty Images

Trump walks back 20% Strait of Hormuz toll that could have raised US gas prices 35 cents per gallon and violated maritime law, experts say

President Trump walked back his plan for the U.S. to “become guardians” of the Strait of Hormuz on Tuesday — a strategy that he previously said would have imposed a 20% toll on all cargo shipped for “providing safety and security to this very volatile section of the world.”

“I have decided to replace the 20% United States reimbursement fee with trade and investment deals that the various Gulf states will be making into the United States,” Trump wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday. “Those investments will be massive but, at the same time, extraordinarily good for them, and their future.”

Advertisement

Trump didn’t elaborate on how much money such investments would include. He also claimed that the “Strait of Hormuz is open to all ship traffic except for Iran — and that is because of their lying, violent, malicious leadership.”

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

The U.S. military announced a naval blockade against Iran beginning July 14 at 4 p.m. ET, while

The BBC reports that the ongoing hostilities in Iran and strikes from the U.S. have resulted in a reduced number of ships passing through the Strait.

The conflict in Iran shot the price of crude oil up to more than $86 as of Tuesday morning, its highest price in a month.

Trump’s walkback of his 20% toll, meanwhile, marks a reversal on a strategy that Harold York, nonresident fellow in energy and global oil in the Center for Energy Studies at the Baker Institute, told Moneywise would have represented “an unprecedented structural levy on global energy trade.”

How a 20% toll impacts the price at the pumps

American drivers may have just dodged a major price hike at the pumps with President Trump’s retreat from his 20% toll idea.

The exact impact of such a toll, York noted, would fluctuate based on the ship and the country paying it, among other factors.

For Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC) carrying up to 2 million barrels of crude oil, he said a 20% toll could have amounted to a toll of anywhere between $26 million to $34 million per carrier — 17 times more than Iran’s reported $2 million tolls on some carriers in the Strait.

Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, a co-director of the Baker Institute’s Middle East Energy Roundtable, agreed, estimating a similar price jump and told Moneywise that “any such increase in the cost of transporting oil through the Strait would certainly feed into prices at the pump.”

Advertisement

York estimated that a $15 per barrel toll increase could have led to a 30 to 35 cent per gallon hike at the pumps “even if little Gulf oil is physically imported into the United States,” since oil is priced in the global market.

He added that every $10 increase in the price of a barrel of crude oil historically leads, roughly, to a 20 to 30 cent gas price increase per gallon in the U.S. — with various external factors impacting the exact cost difference.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Strait talk: a toll would violate international maritime law

In addition to costing American drivers more when they fill up, Trump’s Strait toll would have also been just plain illegal.

Officials in Trump’s own administration have noted the illegality of charging other countries a toll on a waterway and Rockford Weitz, professor of practice in maritime studies at The Fletcher School at Tufts University, agreed.

Advertisement

“Any tolls charged on transits through the Strait of Hormuz would be a clear violation of freedom of navigation and international maritime law,” he told Moneywise, noting that the Strait “is an international waterway under the Law of the Sea so commercial ships have transit passage rights.”

He added that “the U.S. has championed freedom of navigation since our founding,” so Trump’s tolls would signify “a major policy shift.”

York said that multiple countries would likely object to such tolls, while John Calabrese, a Middle East Institute senior fellow, told Moneywise that “if the United States cannot currently guarantee safe passage through Hormuz, on what basis can it sell that guarantee?”

Last week, Trump declared that the ceasefire with Iran was over, reportedly telling Congress that they’d resumed “military action” against the nation.

Iran, meanwhile, mocked the idea of Trump’s 20% toll idea, with the country’s foreign minister quipping “20% is of course too much. We will be fair.”

You May Also Like

Share this:
Mike Crisolago Sr. Staff Reporter

Mike Crisolago is a Sr. Staff Reporter at Moneywise with nearly 20 years of experience working as a journalist, editor, content strategist and podcast host. He specializes in personal finance writing related to the 50-plus demographic and retirement, as well as politics and lifestyle content.

more from Mike Crisolago

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.