• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
White House calls outlets ‘biased’ and ‘trash that is passed as news.’ Here’s what this means for the average American. Win McNamee/Getty Images

‘Trash that is passed as news’: Donald Trump orders funding halt for ‘biased’ PBS, NPR — and even took a swipe at Sesame Street. How this could hurt communities across the US

A new executive order signed by President Donald Trump calls for an immediate halt to federal funding of NPR and PBS, citing what he calls “biased and partisan news coverage.”

A statement from the White House called the outlets “biased” with “trash that is passed as news.” The order directs the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) to immediately cease funding of the National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting System (PBS).

Advertisement

The statement accused both organizations of receiving “tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer funds each year to spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as ‘news.’”

Three CPB board members were removed from their role via email, with just two board members remaining. And that executive order has set the wheels in motion on litigation filed by NPR and three Colorado radio stations, who are now suing the president for violating First Amendment rights.

Public broadcasting on the chopping block

The Trump administration listed 24 examples of “biased” coverage, including the production of a film supporting reparations, failure to cover the Hunter Biden laptop story and the suggestion that crime fears are rooted in racism.

Even beloved puppets weren’t spared.

“PBS show Sesame Street partnered with CNN for a town hall aimed at presenting children with a one-sided narrative to ‘address racism’ amid the Black Lives Matter riots,” the statement said.

Patricia Harrison, president and CEO of CPB, responded by saying the organization is not under the president’s authority

“Congress directly authorized and funded CPB to be a private nonprofit corporation wholly independent of the federal government,” she said, adding that when it was created, it specifically prohibited any government agency or official from directing or controlling its operations.

Advertisement

For the 2025 fiscal year, the CPB received $535 million in federal funding, with about 70% going to support local radio and TV stations.

NPR says it receives about 1% of its funding directly from the federal government. Its 246 member institutions receive 8% to 10% of their funds from CPB. PBS and its stations receive about 15% of their revenues from CPB.

“The appropriation for public broadcasting, including NPR and PBS, represents less than 0.0001% of the federal budget,” Katherine Maher, president and CEO of NPR, said in a statement.

Maher said that NPR programming is essential to its 246 member organizations, which operate more than 1,300 stations. These stations generate on average 50% of all public radio listening, despite only accounting for roughly 25% of station programming.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

The impact on smaller communities

For many rural or remote communities, free public broadcasting is often the only source of news.

Advertisement

In southwestern Colorado, for example, many communities are considered “news deserts,” meaning they rely heavily on public broadcasting. According to 9News, the local affiliate KSUT in Ignacio would lose about 19% of its budget, or $333,000, while Colorado Public Radio would lose about 7% or $1.5 million.

Shari Lamki, president and general manager of Pioneer PBS in Granite Falls, Washington, told The Journal the funding — which makes up about 29% of the station’s annual budget — is “irreplaceable.”

In addition to local and national news, local stations provide public safety information and emergency alerts.

“I have no doubt that the loss of this critical funding would impact this region and the safety of our citizens,” Lamki said.

Aside from the inevitable job losses, the disappearance of strong local stations could diminish civic pride, education and cultural connection — all key to neighborhood stability and desirability. Rural and remote communities would be hit hardest.

Advertisement

Funding cuts “would devastate the public safety, educational and local service missions of public media,” Kate Riley, president and CEO of America’s Public Television Stations, said in a statement. She added that more than 160 local TV stations — particularly those in rural areas — serve as a “lifeline in hundreds of communities where there is no other source of local media.”

Cutting this content would also mean less access to free, educational programming like Sesame Street — especially for families who can’t afford paid alternatives. That includes more than 50% of American children who don’t attend preschool.

PBS LearningMedia — a free resource developed by PBS and local stations — serve about 1.5 million educators, students and homeschoolers each month.

“These are services that American families rely on every day,” Riley said. “In fact, according to a recent YouGov survey, 82% of voters — including 72% of Trump voters — said they valued PBS for its children’s programming and educational tools.”

According to a Pew Research Center survey, about 24% of U.S. adults say Congress should cut federal funding from NPR and PBS. But 43% say they should continue receiving government support.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Vawn Himmelsbach Contributor

Vawn Himmelsbach is a veteran journalist who covers tech, business, finance and travel. Her work has been featured in publications such as The Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, National Post, CBC News, Yahoo Finance, MSN, CAA Magazine, Travelweek, Explore Magazine and Consumer Reports.

more from Vawn Himmelsbach

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.