SPY +1.94%
BND -0.66%
QQQ +3.16%
DIA +1.68%
VNQ +0.84%
GLD -0.42%
BTC -1.78%
AAPL +1.32%
GOOGL +1.97%
NVDA -8.07%
MSFT +2.13%
META +5.26%
AMZN +4.85%
TSLA +4.95%
UBER +2.15%
GS +5.08%
BAC +2.62%
JPM +2.42%
BRK.A +1.16%
COST +0.60%
XOM -1.40%
BABA -4.98%
WMT -0.35%
SPCX +6.71%
DIS +0.93%
F -0.96%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
RV parked on the street in Seattle Joe A. Kunzler/Shutterstock

Seattle mayor vetoes $10M plan requiring permits for people living in RVs — wants to focus on ‘outreach’ instead. Residents are fuming

Seattle doesn’t let anyone park a vehicle on the same block of a city street for more than 72 hours. And if you own an RV without a permit, the city council passed a bill last month that says you can’t stay for more than two hours, starting from April 30, 2027.

Seattle City Councilmember Dan Strauss wrote that permit bill, and it passed 6-3 on Oct. 20. On Nov. 2, Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson called him to say she’d veto it.

Advertisement

“Before we passed this legislation, Mayor Katie Wilson promised me not to veto it and to work together to implement,” Strauss said in a statement.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Wilson signed the other four RV bills but vetoed the permit program. Her office estimated that the program would cost over $10 million by the end of 2027, and she wants the city to focus on outreach instead.

How the permit program would have worked

Without a permit, an RV couldn’t park on a city street between midnight and 6 a.m. If you do park an RV past those limits, without a permit, the city could tow your RV without warning.

To get a permit, you’d have to be counted in a one-time city census of RV residents. And even if you had a permit, you’d still have to follow rules. You’d have to park overnight in an industrial area, follow the same 72-hour parking limit as everyone else and sign up for a shelter or housing waitlist.

In her veto letter, Wilson wrote that a one-time count of every RV resident would be costly and could shut out anyone it missed. She also warned that towing RVs with people still inside could lead to injuries and leave the city legally liable.

Seattle’s been to court over this before. In 2016, the city towed the truck Steven Long was living in after a $44 ticket for parking longer than 72 hours. The initial impound bill came to $946.61.

Long fought it, and in 2021 the Washington Supreme Court sided with him. The court ruled that a vehicle someone lives in is protected under the state’s homestead law, like a house. It also said a person’s ability to pay matters when deciding whether a bill like Long’s is an excessive fine.

Must Read

What Wilson’s executive order does instead

The order directs the Human Services Department (HSD) to help open Glassyard Commons, a safe lot in West Seattle with room for up to 72 RVs plus 20 tiny homes.

Advertisement

The order also has the city keep a list of people living in vehicles, by name, so it can point them to the safe lot and other help on the way to housing. Wilson said the fear of losing their RV keeps many people from saying yes to shelter. One of the bills she did sign lets the city store their RVs while they try out housing.

And nobody’s sure how many RVs are out there. Strauss says the number is 145, and could even be higher. When reporters asked for a count, HSD Deputy Director Chris Klaeysen said the department is still “looking at ironing out those details.”

Who’s angry about the veto, and why

Even Wilson admits people are upset. “I share the frustrations of residents and of members of the Seattle City Council around this important issue,” she said.

Councilmember Rob Saka is one of them. He says his district has more RV problems than any other part of the city. He voted for the permit program, but now he says he’ll give Wilson’s group time. “Our residents deserve results, not just another process,” he said.

That matters because overturning a veto takes six votes, and Strauss only has five without Saka. The council has until Dec. 2 to vote on the veto. Strauss still wants that vote, and he calls Wilson’s order a copy of his own bill.

Advertisement

Homeless advocates cheered the veto. “People will lose their homes and belongings,” Seattle/King County Coalition on Homelessness Executive Director Alison Eisinger said about the bill.

A man who has lived in his RV in Columbia City since 2019 told Real Change he didn’t know what would happen to him under the ban.

What happens next

If six councilmembers don’t vote to override the veto by Dec. 2, the permit program is gone.

Whatever happens, the city is still spending money on RVs. Wilson’s office says it held back $5 million in RV outreach money from this year’s budget until the council finished debating. Next year, she wants $3.5 million for another safe lot.

For people living in RVs, there’s still the 72-hour rule. And if your RV does get towed, the 2021 ruling means what you can afford matters if you fight the impound bill.

You May Also Like

Share this:

Godwin Oluponmile is a content specialist, SEO strategist and copywriter with seven years of expertise in finance, Web 3.0, B2B SaaS and technology. His work has been featured in publications such as Entrepreneur, HackerNoon, Blocktelegraph and Benzinga.

more from Godwin Oluponmile

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.