• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Nicola Miner CBS News

‘I’m speechless’: San Francisco families feel betrayed after learning $3.8M in donations meant for local playgrounds were allegedly used on expenses like ‘swanky galas’ and staff bonuses

The San Francisco Parks Alliance (SFPA) — a nonprofit foundation established to “create, sustain and advocate for parks” — has abruptly shuttered amid a media and legal firestorm over alleged mismanagement involving at least $3.8 million in donations.

That leaves donors like Nicola Miner — whose Baker Street Foundation donated $3 million to the SFPA several years ago — “speechless.” She gave the SFPA that money to support construction of two neighborhood playgrounds.

Advertisement

“I wanted a park here, that was what our money was for,” Miner told CBS News.

But the parks never materialized. Instead, she learned that the SFPA — an arm’s-length fundraising partner of San Francisco’s Recreation and Parks Department — funneled nearly $2 million of her foundation’s donation to cover general operating expenses.

“The money was not for general operating expenses. And so I just feel a real sense of betrayal,” Minser said. “The fact that they took money away from families, I’m speechless.”

A prominent nonprofit falls from grace

The San Francisco Standard reports that top employees at the SFPA got bonuses despite a “massive deficit”, and the nonprofit spent more on “swanky galas” and fundraising events than it made.

“You would never, in a million years, give a bonus under these circumstances,” Joan Harrington, a nonprofit ethics expert at Santa Clara University, said.

In the wake of the allegations, San Francisco’s mayor froze the organization’s funding in May, and City Attorney David Chiu launched an integrity review into the nonprofit.

Subsequently, The San Francisco Standard reported that the SFPA was abruptly “winding down,” leaving donors and partners empty-handed.

Advertisement

Just days afterward, the San Francisco Government Audit and Oversight Committee subpoenaed the organization’s former CEOs and its board treasurer after they failed to show up at a committee hearing.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Doing your donation due diligence

Some donors may be left wondering how they could be let down by such a prominent and politically connected organization. It’s a reminder that a prominent name is no guarantee of continued success or appropriate management — and the prudent approach to committing funds is to perform thorough due diligence.

To help with this process, the Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society (Stanford PACS) has published “The Stanford PACS Guide to Effective Philanthropy,” with questions that donors should try to answer before making a commitment. For example:

  • Does the nonprofit comply with tax regulations?
  • Are its donations earmarked for a specific purpose (like a playground)?
  • Are the donations restricted or unrestricted?
  • How does the organization track and report restricted donations?

Restricted donations have conditions on how those funds are to be used, while unrestricted donations can be used for anything related to the nonprofit’s mission.

Stanford PACS also publishes the Philanthropist Resource Directory, which can be a helpful resource early in the due diligence journey.

Several third-party websites are also available to help with this process.

Advertisement

For example, GuideStar aggregates information about U.S. nonprofits registered as 501(c)(3) organizations and categorizes them based on the amount of information they self-report.

It also publishes IRS Form 990 tax returns, which are filed by “tax-exempt organizations, nonexempt charitable trusts and section 527 political organizations.”

GiveWell researches and recommends charities working in global health and poverty alleviation “that save or improve lives the most per dollar,” while Charity Navigator rates more than 225,000 nonprofits based on their “cost-effectiveness and overall health of a charity’s programs, including measures of stability, efficiency and sustainability.”

The Stanford PACS guide also suggests looking at which organizations have received grants from respected foundations such as the [Gates Foundation]https://www.gatesfoundation.org ) or Ford Foundation — both of which have searchable grants databases — and talking to people who’ve contributed to the organization or worked with it.

Donors can also consider a Donor Advised Fund (DAF), an account that allows donors to give to charity, receive an immediate tax deduction and recommend grants from the fund over time.

Donating a large amount of money to a charity is a big commitment — and even supposedly reputable organizations can run into trouble. So time spent on due diligence is time well spent.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Vawn Himmelsbach Contributor

Vawn Himmelsbach is a veteran journalist who has been covering tech, business, finance and travel for the past three decades. Her work has been featured in publications such as The Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, National Post, Metro News, Canadian Geographic, Zoomer, CAA Magazine, Travelweek, Explore Magazine, Flare and Consumer Reports, to name a few.

more from Vawn Himmelsbach

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.