SPY -1.70%
BND +1.12%
QQQ -2.81%
DIA -1.20%
VNQ +1.31%
GLD -3.26%
BTC -3.91%
AAPL +1.06%
GOOGL -4.07%
NVDA -4.86%
MSFT -1.51%
META -8.22%
AMZN -5.17%
TSLA -3.68%
UBER -0.77%
GS -2.95%
BAC -0.12%
JPM -1.00%
BRK.A +0.28%
COST +0.43%
XOM +2.91%
BABA -4.50%
WMT +1.85%
SPCX -7.36%
DIS +0.40%
F -2.68%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
A photo of an elderly woman and a caretaker shutterstock.com / PeopleImages

Feds say LA hospices signed up seniors who weren’t dying as part of $1.8 billion fraud bust. Some only found out when Medicare told them

For months, the Trump administration has focused on California as a hotbed of hospice fraud — a crime in which fraudsters enroll older people who aren’t terminally ill into hospice care, then charge Medicare millions.

Dr. Mehmet Oz, Head of the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, alleged that Los Angeles County may account for $3.5 billion in hospice and home healthcare fraud, per KFF News.

Advertisement

This week, the U.S. Department of Justice carried out a bust, charging 15 people in the Los Angeles area with defrauding Medicare out of $1.8 billion. Of that, $138 million involved alleged hospice scams.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Among the accused are a hospice medical director alleged to have signed false certificates of terminal illness for people who weren’t terminally ill.

Another reportedly paid kickbacks to recruit older adults into hospice care they didn’t need, billing Medicare $21 million for their care.

A third is accused of “[enrolling] nonterminal Medicare beneficiaries into hospice care and [submitting] claims for medically unnecessary and often unprovided services, resulting in approximately $9.8 million billed to Medicare.” He was also accused of more than a dozen additional fraudulent hospice entities that collectively billed over $107 million.

While the allegations have yet to be proven in court, hospice fraud is an ongoing concern in California. State Attorney General Bob Bonta described it as an “epidemic” in the Los Angeles area.

Darren Lian, Special Agent in Charge of IRS Criminal Investigation’s Los Angeles Field Office, noted that it’s about more than ripping off Medicare.

“Healthcare fraud is not a victimless crime,” he said.

Just ask 71-year-old Southern California resident Linda Henry.

Hospice fraud leaves victims medically vulnerable

Henry learned she was a victim of hospice fraud in 2024 when she contacted Medicare to find out why it denied her coverage for an allergy test.

Advertisement

As AP News reports, a Medicare rep told her she’d been enrolled in hospice care for heart failure. It was the first she’d heard of either the hospice care or her supposed heart failure. She had never even had hospice care, but Medicare was billed for it.

Her doctor confirmed she was in good health, but it took eight months for Medicare to acknowledge she’d been the victim of hospice fraud. She told AP News that she believes her Medicare number was stolen.

Unfortunately, it was more than a bureaucratic headache. It made her medically vulnerable. That’s because Medicare will only cover services related to hospice care for those who are enrolled in it, as they are presumably near the end of life.

“I delayed physical appointments and my colonoscopy and all this stuff because I knew that we were going to fight about this and it wasn’t going to get paid,” she told AP News.

Must Read

Pros and cons of the government crackdown

Critics suggest that the Trump administration is focused on healthcare fraud crackdowns in Democratic states like California, Minnesota and New York.

“The Trump Administration is attempting to take the issue of fraud — a very real, and national issue — and weaponize it against Democratic states,” California’s attorney general said in February.

Advertisement

But when it comes to hospice fraud, the federal government is not only cracking down on hospices in Democratic states like California and Arizona but Republican states Georgia, Nevada, Ohio and Texas. All are considered an “elevated fraud risk.”

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services will be holding a moratorium on licensing new hospices, revoking licences for hundreds of hospices, carrying out hospice visits across the country and examining Medicare claims more thoroughly.

Unfortunately, legitimate hospices have been swept up in the federal fraud crackdown. The Washington Post found that 43 legitimate hospices in the U.S. had their licenses suspended.

Lauren Hunt, an expert on hospice care, is concerned about the impact on patients who are terminally ill and need hospice care. She teaches at the Institute for Health Policy Studies at the University of California-San Francisco.

“The fraud situation has done a lot of damage to the reputation of hospices overall and undone a lot of the progress that had been made in destigmatizing hospice,” she told KFF News.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Laura Boast Senior Reporter

Laura Boast is a Senior Reporter with Moneywise.com and a lifelong content creator who has reached international audiences at Discovery, CBC, Blue Ant Media, Bond Brand Loyalty and more.

more from Laura Boast

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.