• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
A short stone wall that reads "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement." Imagesgalore123/Getty Images

A hastily funded ICE facility in Texas, the largest in the US, wasted millions and put detainees at risk, report finds

The nation’s largest ICE facility is facing fresh scrutiny this week after a new report outlined “millions of dollars in waste” and failure to meet “applicable detention standards” since its opening last August.

The report, released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) on Tuesday, delves into operations at Camp East Montana, situated on the Fort Bliss military base in El Paso, Texas.

Advertisement

“Any time federal agencies spend large amounts of money quickly — whether after natural disasters, the COVID-19 pandemic, or our current spending on immigration enforcement — we are attuned to the risk of waste or other problems,” Heather MacLeod, the GAO’s Director of Homeland Security and Justice, told Moneywise. “Unfortunately, we’ve also had similar findings at other DHS detention facilities in the past.”

The GAO report also identified “performance and oversight challenges” that posed “serious risks” to the safety of detainees and staff — including “gaps in medical services,” “unsanitary conditions” and multiple deaths at the facility.

Following its release, Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, one of the lawmakers who requested the GAO report, said that, “Excessive use of force, lacking medical and mental health care, and wasted taxpayer dollars are emblematic of this mass deportation scheme.”

Uncovering waste at Camp East Montana

According to the GAO report, the Army took over the search for a contractor to run Camp East Montana after ICE failed to find one.

The questionable spending began with the awarding of a $1.3 billion contract to Acquisition Logistics, which “did not have prior experience providing detention services.” The company was reportedly run out of a Virginia home.

From there, the GAO documented “millions of dollars in waste” as a result of the Army’s failure “to adjust pricing for meals and operational costs if the facility was not operating at full capacity.”

That included $11.5 million for “the full cost for guards, medical services, transportation, meals, and other services” from August 1 to August 15, despite detainees only arriving on August 16.

Advertisement

As well, the Army paid “an additional $423,000 for meals it did not need when the facility was operating below its designated capacity” between August 16 and September 30.

ICE then took over the contract to run Camp East Montana but remained bound to the Army’s original agreement and, thus, paid $7.1 million for meals for 5,000 detainees even though, at times, only 1,600 were housed at the facility.

The report also found ICE broke its own policy by failing to inspect the facility before it opened and noted it lacked perimeter security cameras, areas for attorney and family visitation and outdoor recreation space.

The GAO found “gaps in medical services” too, including failures to properly care for people with chronic conditions and “inadequate tuberculosis screening” that led to an outbreak.

Advertisement

A guard also lost their firearm while at the facility, and it was never found.

The GAO report comes after a February Congressional letter to DHS flagged “food that is rotten or frozen,” dorms housing 72 people being cleaned once every eight days instead of daily, and “flooding and sewage backups … leading to stagnant water.”

Previous reports described the conditions at Camp East Montana as “1,000% worse than a prison” — including one suicide among other attempts, along with the death of detainee Geraldo Lunas Campos, which was later ruled “a homicide caused by asphyxia.”

ICE appointed Amentum Services, Inc. as the facility’s new contractor in March.

When asked by Moneywise about the GAO report, DHS noted the new contractor and added that the change allows for “more on-site staff and a precise quality assurance surveillance plan.” They also claimed “ICE will have even more oversight of the contractors at this facility.”

Advertisement

Neither Acquisition Logistics nor Amentum Services responded to Moneywise’s request for comment. The Army replied, saying it had “nothing to add” beyond the Department of Defense response in the report, which includes an agreement to “improve processes as required” while maintaining that the report contains some “factual inaccuracies.”

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Billions of taxpayer dollars are flowing toward ICE

The GAO report includes recommendations for cost-saving measures and facility inspections going forward, but notes that neither ICE or the Army “identified plans to assess those lessons to inform future efforts.”

MacLeod said DHS told the GAO that it plans to address the cost-savings recommendation by year-end but has not provided timelines for the other suggestions. She added that her office “didn’t assign a specific due date for the recommendations” but that the GAO follows up every six months when it makes them.

In the meantime, ICE is spending $38.3 billion to renovate 16 existing buildings to serve as detention centers.

As well, a Republican-supported bill that passed the House on Tuesday designates another $38 billion for ICE, adding to the $75 billion in additional funding that ICE received from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last year.

To that end, MacLeod noted that, “We’re also continuing other work evaluating ICE’s expansion of its detention capacity and associated costs.”

You May Also Like

Share this:
Mike Crisolago Sr. Staff Reporter

Mike Crisolago is a Sr. Staff Reporter at Moneywise with nearly 20 years of experience working as a journalist, editor, content strategist and podcast host. He specializes in personal finance writing related to the 50-plus demographic and retirement, as well as politics and lifestyle content.

more from Mike Crisolago

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.