Since the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was unleashed on U.S. government agencies with a mandate to eliminate wasteful spending, there have been reports of the team requesting unfettered access to systems that host sensitive data belonging to millions of Americans.
This has led to a stream of lawsuits being filed attempting to block DOGE, the brianchild of Tesla CEO and billionaire Elon Musk, from accessing personal information held by the Internal Revenue Service, Social Security Administration and other federal agencies.
Some of these complaints have resulted in temporary blocks against DOGE from accessing information based on privacy laws. In one case, a judge questioned why the team needed access to large amounts of Social Security data, including health records, and wondered if a more focused approach could accomplish the same job.
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
“This is like hitting a fly with a sledgehammer,” U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander said during a hearing on March 14, according to The Associated Press.
These events have raised questions about the government’s dedication to protecting privacy, and whether or not it has the right to grant DOGE wide-ranging access to the info of Americans.
Executive order
President Donald Trump signed an executive order establishing DOGE on Jan. 20, its stated goal being “modernizing federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity.” The order further states the administrator of DOGE shall work with agency heads to “promote interoperability between agency networks and systems, ensure data integrity and facilitate responsible data collection and synchronization.”
In addition, the executive order outlined DOGE has “full and prompt access to all unclassified agency records, software systems and IT systems.”
This suggests DOGE has the president’s blessing to access unclassified data from federal agencies. It isn’t clear how far-reaching that access has been thus far, and what it might do with any sensitive data.
But many agency leaders and labor groups have pushed back against DOGE’s attempts to access information, freeze federal funding and lay off thousands of workers. This has put a magnifying glass on the actual legality of its actions.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
What does the law say?
Right now, the courts face the challenge of determining whether DOGE’s attempts to access sensitive information is legal. There are some laws that control how the government can collect and store data that could aid judges in their decisions.
One is the Privacy Act of 1974. The main premise of the act is to let American citizens know about the systems that exist and the types of data the government collects about them. It also mandates that federal agencies must establish records for lawful purposes only and to safeguard them.
“It requires federal agencies to take care of your data and not willfully or negligently provide it to others, [and] to make sure their systems are secure,” Gary Mason, an attorney, told CNN. Another attorney, Cornish Hitchcock, explained to the news outlet data sharing between agencies must meet certain conditions and go through procedures.
Basically, the Privacy Act of 1974 is meant to help you instill trust in government systems from the way it handles your sensitive information.
Another law, the Tax Reform Act of 1976, features Section 6103, places limits on the IRS and its ability to disclose your tax return information. But there are some exceptions. For example, the IRS may share data with law enforcement for investigation and prosecution of non-tax criminal laws, and also with the SSA for matters regarding Social Security and Medicare tax liability.
If DOGE is allowed full access to Americans’ sensitive data, privacy advocates are concerned about what the administration might be willing to do with the information. How things will play out is not yet known.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Sarah Li-Cain, AFC is a finance and small business writer with over a decade of experience.
