The city of Dallas is suing a former firefighter, saying in a lawsuit that Ivan Gonzales kept receiving paychecks for 20 months after he left the city’s fire department and even after moving out of the state. In total, the city alleges, the payments came to $127,441.
Gonzales resigned from Dallas Fire-Rescue in June 2023 and submitted his termination paperwork to human resources. The city alleges the paperwork was not processed until last April. During that gap, Gonzales’ supervisor continued to approve biweekly paychecks for a roster of over 250 employees, assuming they had worked the required 40 hours a week, according to The Dallas Morning News (1).
“There were many other Ivans and Gonzales’ on Captain (Corey) Womack’s roster, which prevented him from realizing Mr. Gonzales had not been removed from the roster,” the lawsuit states.
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
City officials declined to tell the Morning News whether this was the only case of former employees being paid in error.
Not just back salary
City officials allege Gonzales updated his banking information in the city’s payroll system after he left and moved to Florida, allowing the payments to continue being deposited into his account. In addition to the back salary, the city is asking the court to add interest starting from the date the lawsuit was filed.
“This money was not intended to be a gift,” city attorneys wrote in the lawsuit. “[These] payments belong to the city in equity and good conscience.”
Generally, employees who receive money after leaving a job are required to pay it back. But since this case appears to involve a clerical error by the fire department, the situation may not be so cut and dry.
In fact, the broader issue of repaying an employer after leaving is not always clear. Some workers who receive signing bonuses, tuition reimbursement or various types of training must repay those benefits if they leave within a set period.
Those are known as “stay or pay” agreements, meant to ensure the employers get a fair return on their investment.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
TRAPS
In some instances, “stay or pay” agreements are criticized as tools to limit employee mobility. Critics call them TRAPS, or Training Repayment Agreement Provisions, which can require workers to pay thousands of dollars if they leave.
“Because TRAPs are often structured to prevent workers from transitioning to competing employers, they substitute for traditional noncompete clauses, which have come under growing scrutiny from federal government agencies and state lawmakers,” wrote Chris Hicks, a senior policy adviser at consumer advocacy group Protect Borrowers, in a blog post (2). “But TRAPs may be even more effective at limiting or blocking workers from leaving their jobs than traditional noncompetes, particularly for low-wage workers who can’t afford to pay their employer a substantial sum to quit.”
Some states, including California (3), have banned or limited certain stay-or-pay provisions.
Texas has not. Even if it had, it likely would not apply to the Gonzales case.
Article Sources
We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our editorial ethics and guidelines.
The Dallas Morning News (1); Protect Borrowers (2); Morgan Lewis (3)
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Chris Morris is a US based veteran journalist with more than 35 years of experience at many of the biggest digital news outlets. In addition to his activities as a writer, reporter and editor, Chris is also a frequent moderator and speaker at major conferences, including CES and South by Southwest.
