SPY +0.10%
BND +0.24%
QQQ -1.14%
DIA +0.35%
VNQ -0.24%
GLD -1.37%
BTC +1.43%
AAPL +0.74%
GOOGL +1.58%
NVDA +0.30%
MSFT +1.04%
META +2.33%
AMZN +0.25%
TSLA -2.13%
UBER -0.23%
GS -0.82%
BAC -5.37%
JPM -1.10%
BRK.A +0.39%
COST +1.30%
XOM +3.94%
BABA +1.15%
WMT +0.09%
SPCX -3.93%
DIS +0.83%
F -0.26%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
A woman works at her desk. Lisa-S / Shutterstock

38-year-old woman accused of stealing $28,000 from six dead customers — and a living one — at a Mississippi credit union

Stealing from the dead is a particular kind of audacity. Doing it from inside a credit union, across seven accounts, while employed as a trusted staff member, is another level entirely.

That’s what Bettendorf, Iowa police allege Amanda Nicole Tincher, a 38-year-old employee at IH Mississippi Valley Credit Union in Bettendorf, did. On July 2, a credit union official noticed multiple suspicious transactions on the account of a recently deceased member. They made a call, and police investigated the next day.

Advertisement

Officers sat down with Tincher, who reportedly said, “It’s pretty clear what was done,” according to 25News.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

What happened

According to court documents, Tincher had made multiple withdrawals from a deceased member’s account, created cashier’s checks in her name, transferred money to her CashApp account and made cash withdrawals — stealing $21,279.51 from that account alone. When police questioned her, she denied taking money from any other accounts.

The credit union later found that Tincher had made similar transactions across six additional accounts. Of the seven accounts targeted, six belonged to deceased members. The total amount stolen was $28,326.28.

In one particularly brazen move, Tincher allegedly transferred money from one living victim’s account into the account of a deceased member — apparently to cover the missing funds when beneficiaries started asking questions.

Tincher was charged on several counts, including first-degree theft, ongoing criminal conduct, first-degree fraudulent practice, second-degree theft and fraudulent practice, four counts each of third-degree theft and fraudulent practice, and lesser misdemeanor theft and fraud charges. She was released on a $25,000 bond in early October and has a preliminary hearing scheduled for October 16.

Must Read

Why deceased accounts are vulnerable

This highlights a specific and possibly underappreciated vulnerability in financial accounts: the period immediately following an account holder’s death, when the account may still be active and accessible to those with system access, but family members or beneficiaries may not yet be monitoring it closely.

Advertisement

The FDIC confirms that a deceased person’s accounts are treated as if the owner were still alive for a six-month grace period — a rule designed to give families time to reorganize or restructure accounts without losing deposit insurance coverage.

During that window, the accounts remain open, and funds remain accessible through normal banking channels — the exact exposure the Tincher case illustrates.

What this means for your accounts

This case is a reminder that insider fraud at financial institutions is a real and recurring risk. If you’re the beneficiary or executor of a deceased person’s accounts, notifying the financial institution promptly and monitoring for unauthorized transactions is critical.

In this case, the credit union identified the fraud internally, but only after Tincher had already moved through seven accounts.

According to the National Credit Union Administration, federally insured credit unions held $1.91 trillion in insured shares and deposits as of the second quarter of 2026. That money is only as safe as the people managing access to it. When trust breaks down — as it allegedly did here — the consequences fall hardest on those who are no longer around to notice.

You May Also Like

Share this:

With a writing and editing career spanning over 15 years, Emma creates and refines content across a broad spectrum of industries, including personal finance, lifestyle, travel, health & wellness, real estate, beauty & fitness and B2B/SaaS/tech.

more from Emma Caplan-Fisher

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.