As much as U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese Paramount Leader Xi Jinping work to ease historical tensions, our two nations remain locked in a perpetual neck-and-neck power struggle in a number of arenas, AI being chief among them.
But, to some, it seems like China may be playing dirty when it comes to achieving global tech domination.
The White House asserts it has evidence that entities from the Asian superpower have been embarking on “industrial-level” initiatives to copy American chatbot models through a technique called distillation, which, used maliciously, enables them to reproduce our sector’s innovation for a fraction of the cost (and the work).
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
While the federal government has underscored such intellectual property risks before, the magnitude of the alleged conspiracy — and how it plans to address it — was really outlined this spring in a memo from the U.S. Office of Science and Technology, which condemned how these unnamed groups were attempting to “expose proprietary information… systematically extract capabilities from American AI [and] exploit American expertise.”
The key next steps listed at the time were to brief domestic tech giants on the details of the situation, establish best practices to identify and mitigate the threat, fortify companies with the resources to better defend against these campaigns, and “explore a range of measures to hold foreign actors accountable for industrial-scale distillation campaigns.”
But, as the months have progressed, it seems that the problem is worsening, if anything.
U.S. companies at a loss for how to stop firms from ripping off their tech
In recent letters to officials, leaders from two U.S. behemoths in the space, OpenAI (creator of ChatGPT) and Anthropic (known for Claude), raised alarm bells about tens of thousands of phony accounts they believed were being employed by at least one Chinese competitor to “illicitly” and “brazenly” steal their programs to mimic their products and “repackage them as their own.”
Like in April’s missive from the White House, the communications emphasized the systemic and industrial nature of these foreign efforts, and how much farther ahead they’ve put China in the AI race.
Industry players believe that the gap between U.S. and Chinese development is now “very slim,” with startups like Alibaba, Z.ai and DeepSeek gaining ground and matching homegrown makers with virtually as capable models that are cheaper to make and, critically, to use.
Much of the world already seems to view China as leading the sector, while it has also gained somewhat of a soft power edge as anti-American rhetoric festers on U.S. soil. Another interesting factor is an apparently growing trend among Chinese tech professionals who trained, whether through education or work, in America: returning home afterward to use their skills there.
Must Read
- The ultra-rich use these 5 real estate strategies to build wealth while they sleep — you can start with just $100
- Here’s the average income of Americans by age in 2026. Are you keeping up or falling behind?
- Insurance companies profit most from drivers who auto-renew without shopping around. Comparing 100+ quotes takes 2 minutes and costs nothing
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
A complicated rivalry
There are a number of factors that make the allegations in question here somewhat murky — and that make taking action against them difficult.
For one, distillation itself is part and parcel of the AI landscape, with multiple companies amicably using one another’s data to advance their own projects over the years. This is especially acceptable with open source software, but frowned upon when it is used inappropriately or without permission, like to copy and emulate complex, exclusive systems.
Still, there are conflicting views on whether something like copyright law could apply in these cases, and lawyers who have spoken with the New York Times say it would be “very challenging” to address any of this in U.S. court.
Some experts also assert that no one can construct competitive AI solely through distillation.
“This narrative that all of the capabilities of these models are coming from Anthropic is not as true as people say it is,” one lawyer told the Times in June.
Though Anthropic and others do not permit distillation of its proprietary technology, most of its major Chinese peers are open source, which has actually served as an edge, allowing more growth in the country’s tech sector and making some Chinese components foundational in other, potentially even U.S., models.
You May Also Like
- JP Morgan sees gold hitting $6,000/oz before 2027 — and a Gold IRA lets you hold the physical metal while deferring the tax bill. Get your free guide from Priority Gold
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
Becky Robertson is a senior staff reporter at Moneywise and a lifelong writer. Along with more than a decade covering news at outlets like blogTO and Quill & Quire, she's attended writing residencies around the world. With 33 countries visited, she finds travel to be among her greatest inspirations.
