• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
A photo of US President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping gettyimages.com / ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS

China allegedly undercutting U.S. AI by copying tech “illicitly, systematically and at industrial scale” — and not much can be done about it

As much as U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese Paramount Leader Xi Jinping work to ease historical tensions, our two nations remain locked in a perpetual neck-and-neck power struggle in a number of arenas, AI being chief among them.

But, to some, it seems like China may be playing dirty when it comes to achieving global tech domination.

Advertisement

The White House asserts it has evidence that entities from the Asian superpower have been embarking on “industrial-level” initiatives to copy American chatbot models through a technique called distillation, which, used maliciously, enables them to reproduce our sector’s innovation for a fraction of the cost (and the work).

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

While the federal government has underscored such intellectual property risks before, the magnitude of the alleged conspiracy — and how it plans to address it — was really outlined this spring in a memo from the U.S. Office of Science and Technology, which condemned how these unnamed groups were attempting to “expose proprietary information… systematically extract capabilities from American AI [and] exploit American expertise.”

The key next steps listed at the time were to brief domestic tech giants on the details of the situation, establish best practices to identify and mitigate the threat, fortify companies with the resources to better defend against these campaigns, and “explore a range of measures to hold foreign actors accountable for industrial-scale distillation campaigns.”

But, as the months have progressed, it seems that the problem is worsening, if anything.

U.S. companies at a loss for how to stop firms from ripping off their tech

In recent letters to officials, leaders from two U.S. behemoths in the space, OpenAI (creator of ChatGPT) and Anthropic (known for Claude), raised alarm bells about tens of thousands of phony accounts they believed were being employed by at least one Chinese competitor to “illicitly” and “brazenly” steal their programs to mimic their products and “repackage them as their own.”

Like in April’s missive from the White House, the communications emphasized the systemic and industrial nature of these foreign efforts, and how much farther ahead they’ve put China in the AI race.

Industry players believe that the gap between U.S. and Chinese development is now “very slim,” with startups like Alibaba, Z.ai and DeepSeek gaining ground and matching homegrown makers with virtually as capable models that are cheaper to make and, critically, to use.

Much of the world already seems to view China as leading the sector, while it has also gained somewhat of a soft power edge as anti-American rhetoric festers on U.S. soil. Another interesting factor is an apparently growing trend among Chinese tech professionals who trained, whether through education or work, in America: returning home afterward to use their skills there.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

A complicated rivalry

There are a number of factors that make the allegations in question here somewhat murky — and that make taking action against them difficult.

Advertisement

For one, distillation itself is part and parcel of the AI landscape, with multiple companies amicably using one another’s data to advance their own projects over the years. This is especially acceptable with open source software, but frowned upon when it is used inappropriately or without permission, like to copy and emulate complex, exclusive systems.

Still, there are conflicting views on whether something like copyright law could apply in these cases, and lawyers who have spoken with the New York Times say it would be “very challenging” to address any of this in U.S. court.

Some experts also assert that no one can construct competitive AI solely through distillation.

“This narrative that all of the capabilities of these models are coming from Anthropic is not as true as people say it is,” one lawyer told the Times in June.

Though Anthropic and others do not permit distillation of its proprietary technology, most of its major Chinese peers are open source, which has actually served as an edge, allowing more growth in the country’s tech sector and making some Chinese components foundational in other, potentially even U.S., models.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Becky Robertson Sr. Staff Reporter

Becky Robertson is a senior staff reporter at Moneywise and a lifelong writer. Along with more than a decade covering news at outlets like blogTO and Quill & Quire, she's attended writing residencies around the world. With 33 countries visited, she finds travel to be among her greatest inspirations.

more from Becky Robertson

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.