It’s a bird. It’s a plane. It’s an Amazon Prime Air delivery drone.
While it’s not as catchy as Superman’s slogan, Amazon delivery drones are far more common in American skies, buzzing along with the promise of dropping items “5 pounds or less that fit in a large shoebox” right into your yard for roughly $3 to $5 within an hour of ordering.
Though the tech offers speed and convenience, some who live below drone flight paths say that Prime Air delivers more than just packages. In the Texas suburb of Richardson, for example, residents contend that daily drone noise disrupts their lives, with the New York Times describing it as “sometimes so loud that they sound like flying lawn mowers.”
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
“We hear them zoom, zoom, zoom, back and forth from morning until past dinnertime,” Nikki Anderson, one resident, told the outlet. “We’re thinking, ‘Ugh, is there anything we can do to stop this?’ We can’t live like this.”
The drone noise isn’t just a Richardson problem. Residents in Auburn Hills and Ferndale, Michigan are also speaking out about the alleged racket. And the issue could spread — Amazon plans to expand its drone delivery from areas in seven states today to around 500 locales nationwide, including in New York, Illinois, Georgia and Idaho, by the end of the year.
“What’s happening in Richardson is about to happen all over the country,” another resident, Scott Bratcher, told the Times, “and people are finally going to believe us that having all these drones flying around is actually a big, big problem.”
When convenience comes with a buzz
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) estimates that commercial unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) like Prime Air could total 1.5 million aircraft in U.S. skies by 2030.
That number, in theory, includes delivery drones from other companies as well, such as Alphabet’s Wing, which works with retailers like Walmart and DoorDash, along with any other commercial drones. But it’s Prime Air that’s currently causing noise complaints.
Prime Air drones look like little white rockets with six propellers and, according to the FAA, weigh 78 pounds and can carry a maximum of 5 pounds as they fly up to 73 mph, 400 feet above the ground.
Amazon didn’t respond to Moneywise’s request for comment for this story, but its website notes the drones are 100% electricity-powered, can fly in rain and freezing temperatures, operate within a 7.5-mile radius from delivery centers and boast both obstacle detection and collision avoidance technology — though reports of Amazon drone crashes exist, including one device that hit a Richardson apartment building in February.
It adds that the drones feature a “perceived sound comparable to a residential HVAC unit.” And some residents in various news reports noted that they weren’t bothered by drone noise.
Further, Amazon spokeswoman Lindsay Hamilton told the Times that in 2026, “fewer than 1 percent” of the feedback the company has received was about noise.
But others beg to differ. Some Richardson locals characterized the sound as “like a loud swarm of bees” while, in Auburn Hills, a resident claimed that “there’s always at least 8 to 10 drones going over houses per day,” emitting “a constant buzzing sound.” Some local regulations, like in Richardson, allow for deliveries between 7 a.m. and 8 p.m., with one Richardson resident telling the Times that she counted 52 drones passing overhead, describing that as “a slow day.”
And a Richardson homeowners association president said his community might seek reduced property taxes as a result of the noise — actions that may seem extreme until you consider that a 2025 study of U.S. homes near aviation corridors found that “a one-decibel increase in annual day-night average sound level reduces house prices by 0.6% to 1.0%.”
The FAA, meanwhile, told Moneywise that the agency “completed a nationwide environmental review for drone package delivery” in July, concluding that “it would not have a significant environmental impact.” It added that drone operators are responsible “for addressing issues identified through that review, which can include noise, wildlife and historic resources.”
They also said they encourage those operators to address “community concerns, even when the noise does not meet the threshold for a significant impact under federal environmental law.”
Representatives of the cities of Richardson and Auburn Hills didn’t return Moneywise’s request for comment.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
The fight for a quieter sky
Residents pushing back against allegedly noisy delivery drones don’t have much recourse on the municipal level. A Richardson city website notes that “The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) controls national airspace. This means cities cannot restrict drones from flying above a certain altitude or create airspace limitations that would conflict with federal rules.”
It suggests that residents direct complaints to Amazon or federal elected officials, “who can request updates on the FAA’s review of constituent concerns.”
And while reports suggest that Amazon did alter its drone operations, or offer to address concerns, in Richardson and Auburn Hills, many residents still aren’t happy.
Some protested at an Amazon distribution facility while a community group reportedly dubbed the “drone warriors” employed apps to track drone flights in their area and stay on top of local lawmakers to try to change drone operations in their city.
Others, meanwhile, are speaking out at city council meetings, asking their local governments to reject approvals for the building of Amazon drone facilities planned for their communities.
At one such September community meeting in the Massachusetts town of Westborough, resident Jennifer Parent delivered her opposition bluntly.
“Just because we can do it doesn’t mean we should do it,” she said, according to Boston.com. “I think people really need to start standing up to the tech industries.”
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Mike Crisolago is a Sr. Staff Reporter at Moneywise with nearly 20 years of experience working as a journalist, editor, content strategist and podcast host. He specializes in personal finance writing related to the 50-plus demographic and retirement, as well as politics and lifestyle content.
