• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

News
Holly Bennet fought for her innocence for over a year. CBS News

Disabled Colorado grandma took out a second mortgage and took on the state when wrongly accused of possessing cocaine: The costs of flawed drug tests

When Holly Bennet awoke after emergency surgery, a Boulder, Colorado police officer was standing at her bedside.

The disabled grandmother had been in a car accident and was recovering from septic shock. But as CBS News reports, she had a bigger shock coming (1).

Advertisement

The officer was there to charge her with possession of cocaine.

“I said, ‘Cocaine? Cocaine? I don’t do cocaine,’” she told the news outlet (1).

Emergency responders had uncovered a prescription drug crushed in her purse during the accident. They turned it over to police at the scene.

Officers immediately ran the substance through a drug test known as a colorimetric field test, which returned a false positive for cocaine.

This is not uncommon. The tests have a false-positive rate of nearly 40% according to a 2024 report by the Quattrone Center at the University of Pennsylvania Law School (2).

Police across the U.S. use colorimetric tests because they’re convenient — they can be done roadside or anywhere in the field — and cheap.

But as the Quattrone Center report reveals, flawed tests come with a high legal, financial and personal cost for an estimated 30,000 innocent Americans wrongfully charged with drug possession every year. Bennet is one of them.

Advertisement

Here’s how her fight of nearly two years ended up at the Colorado State Capitol building and what it could mean for others wrongfully accused of drug possession.

One woman’s long costly, battle against a wrongful charge

As it stands, anyone wrongly accused of drug possession can — at the authorities’ discretion — be arrested or detained. They can fight the charge in court at their own expense or take a plea deal.

It’s one reason why the Quattrone study concluded that the colorimetric test is “one of the largest, if not the largest, known contributing factor to wrongful arrests and convictions in the United States.”

The Boulder District Attorney’s Office recommended Bennet plead guilty to possession. In return, they’d drop criminal charges and she could do some other form of restitution, like community service.

Bennet refused to accept the plea deal. She wanted to clear her name. So she took out a second mortgage on her house to hire lawyer Noah Stout.

They asked the state prosecutor to run a second test on the substance found in her purse, but he initially refused.

For a year and a half, Bennet and Stout continued to fight for a re-test. The battle took a toll on Bennet’s finances and vulnerable health.

Advertisement

Ultimately, she offered to pay out of pocket for a re-test. The prosecutor agreed, and the follow-up lab analysis proved she was right — and innocent — all along.

Stout praised his client’s courage, but told CBS News he’s concerned about thousands of innocent Americans “who don’t have the resources, the tenacity of Holly who might just be pressured into taking a plea bargain.”

Colorado Rep. Jennifer Bacon agrees.

“When you’re standing in front of law enforcement, then they shake something and they’re like, ‘You have it,’ people don’t know how they can fight that,” she told CBS.

“And so they’re just taking deals.”

Now, based on Bennet’s case, Bacon and fellow Colorado state lawmakers have introduced a bill that would require law enforcement to issue a ticket for suspected drug possession based on a presumptive test — pending a lab test — rather than booking a suspect into detention (3).

Advertisement

Bennet testified in support of the proposed bill at the Colorado State Capitol. It could be another battle. A similar bill introduced by California Sen. Scott Wiener failed in that state (4)

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Understanding the financial impact of a wrongful charge

A wrongful arrest can be traumatic. Not only can it lead to immediate incarceration, it can cost thousands of dollars — from bail costs to legal fees — even if charges are eventually dropped.

For vulnerable individuals, including older adults and people on fixed incomes, the consequences can be devastating.

Bennet had to take out a second mortgage to pay her legal bills, a risky move as the interest payments would be higher.

But the long-term costs of taking a plea deal when innocent are even higher:

  • Reputational damage. You might lose your job or even lose child custody (5).
  • Long-term financial damage. You may struggle to get a job, a lease or access credit, for car loans or mortgages.

If you’re wrongly accused of drug possession, you have the right to a criminal defense attorney (preferably one that specializes in wrongful arrests), and you have the right to challenge the presumptive test in court.

Taking a plea deal while innocent can avoid prolonged stress and financial strain, but it means you’ll have a permanent criminal record for a crime you didn’t commit.

Article sources

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our editorial ethics and guidelines.

CBS News (1); Quattrone Center (2); Colorado General Assembly (3); CalMatters (4); Forensic Resources (5)

You May Also Like

Share this:
Vawn Himmelsbach Contributor

Vawn Himmelsbach is a veteran journalist who has been covering tech, business, finance and travel for the past three decades. Her work has been featured in publications such as The Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, National Post, Metro News, Canadian Geographic, Zoomer, CAA Magazine, Travelweek, Explore Magazine, Flare and Consumer Reports, to name a few.

more from Vawn Himmelsbach

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.