• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Real Estate News
A concerned man look at his phone. Maya Lab/Shutterstock

Prediction markets now allow people to 'bet' on home prices, letting users profit without owning property. Why this may not pay off for most Americans

Wagering on specific outcomes is already popular in sports, politics and pop culture. Now, it’s moving into real estate.

Platforms offered by the likes of Polymarket and Kalshi now allow users to “bet” on where median home prices in the U.S., or in certain cities, will rise or fall without having to buy or sell a house (1).

Advertisement

Supporters say these prediction market platforms offer exposure to the housing market without the hurdles of down payments, mortgage approval or long-term ownership. But there’s also plenty of controversy, with critics arguing that they aren’t regulated properly and will likely leave average investors worse off financially.

How prediction markets work

Prediction market platforms are online marketplaces where people buy and sell contracts tied to whether a clearly defined outcome will occur by a specific date (2). In real estate markets, they allow users to wager on whether the median U.S. home price, or prices in select metropolitan areas, will end a given month within a specified range.

Participants aren’t buying a home or a portfolio of properties. Instead, they’re purchasing a contract that pays out only if a specific event — such as, for example, the national home price index rising above $420,000 by March 1, 2026 — plays out as they predicted. Users can take either side of the bet, answering “yes” or “no.” If the prediction is correct, the contract pays out; if it isn’t, the participant loses their stake and receives nothing.

These contracts are relatively inexpensive, typically trading between $0 and $1, plus any fees charged by the platform. And participants can buy or sell them before the event concludes, with prices shifting as the market reassesses the likelihood of the outcome.

Participants can also purchase multiple contracts for the same outcome, which allows them to increase their position size on that outcome. However, most platforms have position limits that prevent a single participant from purchasing too many of the same contract and controlling the entire market, helping to ensure fair trading on the platform.

Contract prices reflect the market’s collective assessment of probability. For instance, if a contract is priced at $0.10, the market is signaling a roughly 10% chance the event will occur. Buying that contract costs $0.10 and pays out $1 if the specified outcome occurs.

Betting on home prices isn’t entirely new. Housing futures and options have existed since 2006, but they never gained widespread traction and often struggled with limited liquidity (3). This newer approach, by contrast, makes speculation on real estate markets far more accessible to everyday users.

The appeal is clear: people can take a view on a topic most Americans already have an opinion on, without the costs or complications of a mortgage, down payment, maintenance, taxes and insurance. Moreover, the upfront costs are relatively low, the products — unlike many traditional financial instruments — are marketed in a way that’s easy to understand, and they can be used as a hedge against rising rents or housing inflation.

Advertisement

These products also align with the preferences of many modern investors; they pose a simple, binary question, you either win or lose, and the outcome is determined over a relatively short time frame.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Why betting on home prices can be risky

The ability to bet on home prices hasn’t been welcomed by everyone. Critics liken prediction markets to sports gambling, saying they resemble a “casino” while masking the real risks (4).

Unlike homeownership, betting on housing prices does not build equity, provide shelter or offer tax advantages. And while these contracts may appear simple, the mechanics can be deceptively complex.

Getting paid depends on short-term price movements and precise timing, which even professional investors struggle to predict. Even if home prices move in the expected direction, traders can still lose money if they fail to hit a specific target by a specific date.

There are also concerns about liquidity, limited regulation and whether some participants have an unfair advantage. The markets are often thin enough that a single bet can significantly move prices, and average investors don’t have access to the kind of proprietary data or insider insights that may be available to large institutions, creating an uneven playing field.

This became particularly apparent after a newly created account placed a substantial wager predicting Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s capture shortly before U.S. forces carried out its raid (4). In traditional financial markets, trading on nonpublic information is prohibited. In prediction markets, by contrast, the rules and enforcement mechanisms are far less clear.

While home-price betting may appeal to some investors and renters seeking exposure to housing market trends or protection against inflation, experts caution that it is unlikely to replace the long-term wealth, stability and tax advantages associated with owning a home. For most people, critics say, these products make the cost-of-living crisis and challenge of getting on the housing ladder even more difficult.

Article sources

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our editorial ethics and guidelines.

Business Insider (1); Britannica Money (2); University of North Carolina — Greensboro (3); Associated Press (4).

You May Also Like

Share this:
Daniel Liberto Contributor

Daniel Liberto is a financial journalist with over 10 years of experience covering markets, investing, and the economy. He writes for global publications and specializes in making complex financial topics clear and accessible to all readers.

more from Daniel Liberto

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.