• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Real Estate News
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani smiles at a podium while gesturing offstage. NurPhoto/Getty Images

Zohran Mamdani is calling out billionaires by name — flagging Citadel CEO Ken Griffin and his $238 million mega penthouse he rarely visits

When Zohran Mamdani ran for New York City mayor, he promised (1) to tax the rich. On Tax Day 2026, he made good on it, and he's not being subtle about who he's coming for.

The mayor, along with Governor Kathy Hochul, jointly announced (2) New York State's first-ever pied-à-terre tax: an annual surcharge on luxury second homes valued above $5 million, owned by people whose primary residence is outside New York City.

Advertisement

The measure is projected to generate $500 million in annual revenue, NBC New York reports (3), and could affect as many as 13,000 properties across the five boroughs.

'If you can afford a $5 million second home … you can afford to contribute'

To drive the point home, Mamdani named names. In the official announcement, his office flagged (2) Citadel CEO Ken Griffin's $238 million, 24,000-square-foot penthouse at 220 Central Park South — at the time of closing in 2019, CNN Business reported (4), the most expensive home ever sold in the U.S. — as an example of exactly the kind of property the tax is designed to hit.

Griffin (5), who relocated Citadel's headquarters from Chicago to Miami in 2022 and has assembled a sprawling property portfolio across Saint-Tropez, London, Hawaii, the Hamptons and beyond, reportedly (6) picked up the Midtown property as, in the words of the Wall Street Journal, "a place to stay when he's in town."

That framing is central to Mamdani's argument. "When I ran for mayor, I said I was going to tax the rich. Well, today, we're taxing the rich," Mamdani said in his video announcement (7). "This pied-à-terre tax is specifically designed for the richest of the rich — those who store their wealth in New York City real estate, but who don't actually live here."

Hochul echoed (8) the sentiment at a press conference: "They're part of our skyline, but those people are not part of our city," she said of vacant luxury units. "If you can afford a $5 million second home that sits empty most of the year, you can afford to contribute like every other New Yorker," she added (2).

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

What the tax means and why it matters now

The pied-à-terre concept isn't new to Albany. Similar proposals (9) surfaced in 2014 and again in 2019, but were ultimately blocked or traded off (10) by the real estate industry.

This time, the political dynamics are different. The measure arrived as a late surprise in ongoing state budget negotiations, giving opponents little runway to mount a campaign against it, according to (10) The Real Deal.

The backdrop is a city under genuine financial pressure. Mamdani inherited (11) a $5.3 billion budget gap on day one, and with the city budget due May 1 (12), the revenue clock is ticking. The pied-à-terre tax represents a politically elegant solution: it raises meaningful money without touching income taxes or property levies on ordinary New Yorkers.

For everyday residents, it's a significant move. New York City's housing affordability crisis (13) has been years in the making. The mayor's office framed (2) the tax as a direct response to the practice of using Manhattan real estate as "a vehicle for wealth storage" — trophy assets that sit largely empty while working and middle-class New Yorkers get squeezed out of the market.

The pushback

Not everyone is cheering. Real Estate Board of New York president, Jim Whelan, warned (9) the tax would "eliminate thousands of construction jobs, lower property values and raise costs for New Yorkers," instead of boosting expected revenue.

Advertisement

Compass broker and local trade group president, Jason Haber, noted (9) the political convenience for Albany politicians, who get to vote for a tax that effectively none of their constituents will pay.

Gary Malin, COO of Corcoran Group, predicted (3) the economic impact to be "net neutral, if not negative" once market effects are factored in.

And Serhant broker Ravi Kantha warned the math doesn't work in the city's favor, telling The Real Deal (9): "They're going to sell those assets. And they're not going to sell for what would be market price before this tax is implemented," putting downward pressure on the luxury end of the market rather than producing the revenue Mamdani's counting on.

"There's a breaking point for every place in the world where you make it so difficult and so expensive to live there that even the wealthiest people say, 'I want nothing to do with this,'" he added.

Whether that argument gains traction in Albany remains to be seen. But for now, Mamdani has his win, and Ken Griffin's penthouse has become its unofficial mascot.

Article Sources

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our ethics and guidelines.

Business Insider (1); NYC.gov (2),(12),(13); NBC New York (3); CNN (4); Robb Report (5); StreetEasy (6); YouTube (7); New York State Governor's Office (8); The Real Deal (9),(10); CBS News (11)

You May Also Like

Share this:

With a writing and editing career spanning over 13 years, Emma creates and refines content across a broad spectrum of industries, including personal finance, lifestyle, travel, health & wellness, real estate, beauty & fitness and B2B/SaaS/tech. Her versatility comes through contributions to high-profile clients like Moneywise, Healthline, Narcity and Bob Vila, producing content that informs and engages, along with helping book authors tell their stories.

more from Emma Caplan-Fisher

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.