• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

News
OOzempic and Wegovy are both injectable prescription weight-loss medications. Michael Siluk/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Ozempic’s maker wants the US government to ban cheaper versions of the high-priced $969 injection weight-loss drug – claims the formula is ‘too complex’ to copy safely

Novo Nordisk is urging the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to block ‘copycat’ versions of its popular weight-loss and diabetes drugs, arguing that the complexities of manufacturing these treatments make them too risky to replicate safely.

The drugs Ozempic and Wegovy are injections created to help manage blood sugar in people with Type 2 diabetes. Recently they have gained popularity as an off-label treatment for weight loss.

Advertisement

However, with demand for these drugs surging, affordability has become a major issue. According to recent KFF survey data, nearly 1 in 8 U.S. adults have used a GLP-1 drug like Ozempic, with over 15 million Americans currently holding prescriptions. Yet, more than half of those users report that the cost is difficult to manage.

Novo Nordisk is facing some heat from Senator Bernie Sanders, who publicly challenged the company in a letter, accusing it of charging U.S. patients up to 15 times more for Ozempic and Wegovy in other countries.

“For example, your company charges $969 in the United States for one month of Ozempic but just $155 in Canada and just $59 in Germany,” Sanders wrote.

While Novo Nordisk pushes for a ban on copycat versions, it raises the question of whether this move could hinder efforts to make the drug more accessible to Americans.

What is Novo Nordisk really asking for

Novo Nordisk is asking the FDA to crack down on unapproved, cheaper versions of weight loss drugs. But in the U.S. health care system, compounding pharmacies have long filled supply gaps for essential medications, including cancer treatments like cisplatin.

Often operating as nonprofits, these pharmacies provide more affordable alternatives when branded drugs are unavailable or too expensive. Compounded medications differ mainly in that they lack FDA approval and don’t undergo the same rigorous testing required for branded drugs.

“These drugs are inherently complex to compound safely, and the risks they pose to patient safety far outweigh any benefits,” Novo Nordisk wrote in a statement.

Advertisement

For some patients, however, compounded versions are the only affordable option. With high drug prices and insurance plans often not covering weight-loss treatments, many turn to compounded alternatives.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Prioritizing health or protecting profits?

As Novo Nordisk intensifies its efforts to halt the compounding, questions arise about the true motivation behind its push. While the company says patient safety is its primary concern, critics argue the move may be more about protecting profits.

For Jennie Smith, a seamstress in Ohio, Wegovy’s $1,000 monthly price tag made it inaccessible. After researching, she found a compounded version through an online pharmacy, paying just $300 a month instead. While the key ingredient remains the same, this compounded version was produced by a pharmacy, not a pharmaceutical giant like Novo Nordisk.

Scott Brunner, CEO of the Alliance of Pharmacy Compounding, questioned why it took Novo Nordisk two and a half years to raise concerns about compounded versions.

“Novo Nordisk is so deeply concerned about patient safety that it’s taken them a whopping two-and-a-half years while their drug has been in shortage to conclude that the semaglutide API is so demonstrably difficult for compounding pharmacies to prepare that FDA now needs to place it off-limits for compounding?” Brunner wrote in a statement.

With the FDA’s upcoming decision, the accessibility of affordable alternatives hangs in the balance, potentially reshaping the future of weight-loss treatments and patient options.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Victoria Vesovski Staff Reporter

Victoria Vesovski is a Toronto-based Staff Reporter at Moneywise, where she covers the intersection of personal finance, lifestyle and trending news. She holds an Honours Bachelor of Arts from the University of Toronto, a postgraduate certificate in Publishing from Toronto Metropolitan University and a Master’s degree in American Journalism from New York University’s Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute. Her work has been featured in publications including Apple News, Yahoo Finance, MSN Money, Her Campus Media and The Click.

more from Victoria Vesovski

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.